summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/howto
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/howto')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.txt4
-rw-r--r--Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt16
2 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.txt b/Documentation/howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.txt
index 25378f68d3..db219f5c07 100644
--- a/Documentation/howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.txt
+++ b/Documentation/howto/rebuild-from-update-hook.txt
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:19:10 -0700
Abstract: In this how-to article, JC talks about how he
uses the post-update hook to automate Git documentation page
- shown at http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/.
+ shown at https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/.
Content-type: text/asciidoc
How to rebuild from update hook
===============================
-The pages under http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/
+The pages under https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/
are built from Documentation/ directory of the git.git project
and needed to be kept up-to-date. The www.kernel.org/ servers
are mirrored and I was told that the origin of the mirror is on
diff --git a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt
index 462255ed5d..19f59cc888 100644
--- a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt
+++ b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The history immediately after the "revert of the merge" would look like
this:
---o---o---o---M---x---x---W
- /
+ /
---A---B
where A and B are on the side development that was not so good, M is the
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ After the developers of the side branch fix their mistakes, the history
may look like this:
---o---o---o---M---x---x---W---x
- /
+ /
---A---B-------------------C---D
where C and D are to fix what was broken in A and B, and you may already
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ In such a situation, you would want to first revert the previous revert,
which would make the history look like this:
---o---o---o---M---x---x---W---x---Y
- /
+ /
---A---B-------------------C---D
where Y is the revert of W. Such a "revert of the revert" can be done
@@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ This history would (ignoring possible conflicts between what W and W..Y
changed) be equivalent to not having W or Y at all in the history:
---o---o---o---M---x---x-------x----
- /
+ /
---A---B-------------------C---D
and merging the side branch again will not have conflict arising from an
earlier revert and revert of the revert.
---o---o---o---M---x---x-------x-------*
- / /
+ / /
---A---B-------------------C---D
Of course the changes made in C and D still can conflict with what was
@@ -111,13 +111,13 @@ faulty A and B, and redone the changes on top of the updated mainline
after the revert, the history would have looked like this:
---o---o---o---M---x---x---W---x---x
- / \
+ / \
---A---B A'--B'--C'
If you reverted the revert in such a case as in the previous example:
---o---o---o---M---x---x---W---x---x---Y---*
- / \ /
+ / \ /
---A---B A'--B'--C'
where Y is the revert of W, A' and B' are rerolled A and B, and there may
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ lot of overlapping changes that result in conflicts. So do not do "revert
of revert" blindly without thinking..
---o---o---o---M---x---x---W---x---x
- / \
+ / \
---A---B A'--B'--C'
In the history with rebased side branch, W (and M) are behind the merge