diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt | 216 |
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 104 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt b/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt index 7ba5e589d7..c27d086f68 100644 --- a/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt +++ b/Documentation/gitcore-tutorial.txt @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git * DESCRIPTION ----------- -This tutorial explains how to use the "core" git programs to set up and +This tutorial explains how to use the "core" git commands to set up and work with a git repository. If you just need to use git as a revision control system you may prefer @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ interfaces on top of it called "porcelain". You may not want to use the plumbing directly very often, but it can be good to know what the plumbing does for when the porcelain isn't flushing. +Back when this document was originally written, many porcelain +commands were shell scripts. For simplicity, it still uses them as +examples to illustrate how plumbing is fit together to form the +porcelain commands. The source tree includes some of these scripts in +contrib/examples/ for reference. Although these are not implemented as +shell scripts anymore, the description of what the plumbing layer +commands do is still valid. + [NOTE] Deeper technical details are often marked as Notes, which you can skip on your first reading. @@ -44,7 +52,7 @@ to import into git. For our first example, we're going to start a totally new repository from scratch, with no pre-existing files, and we'll call it 'git-tutorial'. To start up, create a subdirectory for it, change into that -subdirectory, and initialize the git infrastructure with 'git-init': +subdirectory, and initialize the git infrastructure with 'git init': ------------------------------------------------ $ mkdir git-tutorial @@ -102,7 +110,7 @@ An 'object' is identified by its 160-bit SHA1 hash, aka 'object name', and a reference to an object is always the 40-byte hex representation of that SHA1 name. The files in the `refs` subdirectory are expected to contain these hex references -(usually with a final `\'\n\'` at the end), and you should thus +(usually with a final `\n` at the end), and you should thus expect to see a number of 41-byte files containing these references in these `refs` subdirectories when you actually start populating your tree. @@ -139,7 +147,7 @@ but to actually check in your hard work, you will have to go through two steps: - commit that index file as an object. The first step is trivial: when you want to tell git about any changes -to your working tree, you use the 'git-update-index' program. That +to your working tree, you use the 'git update-index' program. That program normally just takes a list of filenames you want to update, but to avoid trivial mistakes, it refuses to add new entries to the index (or remove existing ones) unless you explicitly tell it that you're @@ -173,19 +181,19 @@ and see two files: which correspond with the objects with names of `557db...` and `f24c7...` respectively. -If you want to, you can use 'git-cat-file' to look at those objects, but +If you want to, you can use 'git cat-file' to look at those objects, but you'll have to use the object name, not the filename of the object: ---------------- $ git cat-file -t 557db03de997c86a4a028e1ebd3a1ceb225be238 ---------------- -where the `-t` tells 'git-cat-file' to tell you what the "type" of the +where the `-t` tells 'git cat-file' to tell you what the "type" of the object is. git will tell you that you have a "blob" object (i.e., just a regular file), and you can see the contents with ---------------- -$ git cat-file "blob" 557db03 +$ git cat-file blob 557db03 ---------------- which will print out "Hello World". The object `557db03` is nothing @@ -205,7 +213,7 @@ hexadecimal digits in most places. Anyway, as we mentioned previously, you normally never actually take a look at the objects themselves, and typing long 40-character hex names is not something you'd normally want to do. The above digression -was just to show that 'git-update-index' did something magical, and +was just to show that 'git update-index' did something magical, and actually saved away the contents of your files into the git object database. @@ -228,7 +236,7 @@ $ echo "It's a new day for git" >>hello and you can now, since you told git about the previous state of `hello`, ask git what has changed in the tree compared to your old index, using the -'git-diff-files' command: +'git diff-files' command: ------------ $ git diff-files @@ -239,7 +247,7 @@ version of a 'diff', but that internal version really just tells you that it has noticed that "hello" has been modified, and that the old object contents it had have been replaced with something else. -To make it readable, we can tell 'git-diff-files' to output the +To make it readable, we can tell 'git diff-files' to output the differences as a patch, using the `-p` flag: ------------ @@ -255,7 +263,7 @@ index 557db03..263414f 100644 i.e. the diff of the change we caused by adding another line to `hello`. -In other words, 'git-diff-files' always shows us the difference between +In other words, 'git diff-files' always shows us the difference between what is recorded in the index, and what is currently in the working tree. That's very useful. @@ -283,7 +291,7 @@ that in two phases: creating a 'tree' object, and committing that 'tree' object as a 'commit' object together with an explanation of what the tree was all about, along with information of how we came to that state. -Creating a tree object is trivial, and is done with 'git-write-tree'. +Creating a tree object is trivial, and is done with 'git write-tree'. There are no options or other input: `git write-tree` will take the current index state, and write an object that describes that whole index. In other words, we're now tying together all the different @@ -302,28 +310,28 @@ and this will just output the name of the resulting tree, in this case ---------------- which is another incomprehensible object name. Again, if you want to, -you can use `git cat-file -t 8988d\...` to see that this time the object +you can use `git cat-file -t 8988d...` to see that this time the object is not a "blob" object, but a "tree" object (you can also use `git cat-file` to actually output the raw object contents, but you'll see mainly a binary mess, so that's less interesting). -However -- normally you'd never use 'git-write-tree' on its own, because +However -- normally you'd never use 'git write-tree' on its own, because normally you always commit a tree into a commit object using the -'git-commit-tree' command. In fact, it's easier to not actually use -'git-write-tree' on its own at all, but to just pass its result in as an -argument to 'git-commit-tree'. +'git commit-tree' command. In fact, it's easier to not actually use +'git write-tree' on its own at all, but to just pass its result in as an +argument to 'git commit-tree'. -'git-commit-tree' normally takes several arguments -- it wants to know +'git commit-tree' normally takes several arguments -- it wants to know what the 'parent' of a commit was, but since this is the first commit ever in this new repository, and it has no parents, we only need to pass in -the object name of the tree. However, 'git-commit-tree' also wants to get a +the object name of the tree. However, 'git commit-tree' also wants to get a commit message on its standard input, and it will write out the resulting object name for the commit to its standard output. And this is where we create the `.git/refs/heads/master` file which is pointed at by `HEAD`. This file is supposed to contain the reference to the top-of-tree of the master branch, and since -that's exactly what 'git-commit-tree' spits out, we can do this +that's exactly what 'git commit-tree' spits out, we can do this all with a sequence of simple shell commands: ------------------------------------------------ @@ -345,11 +353,11 @@ instead, and it would have done the above magic scripting for you. Making a change --------------- -Remember how we did the 'git-update-index' on file `hello` and then we +Remember how we did the 'git update-index' on file `hello` and then we changed `hello` afterward, and could compare the new state of `hello` with the state we saved in the index file? -Further, remember how I said that 'git-write-tree' writes the contents +Further, remember how I said that 'git write-tree' writes the contents of the *index* file to the tree, and thus what we just committed was in fact the *original* contents of the file `hello`, not the new ones. We did that on purpose, to show the difference between the index state, and the @@ -360,12 +368,12 @@ As before, if we do `git diff-files -p` in our git-tutorial project, we'll still see the same difference we saw last time: the index file hasn't changed by the act of committing anything. However, now that we have committed something, we can also learn to use a new command: -'git-diff-index'. +'git diff-index'. -Unlike 'git-diff-files', which showed the difference between the index -file and the working tree, 'git-diff-index' shows the differences +Unlike 'git diff-files', which showed the difference between the index +file and the working tree, 'git diff-index' shows the differences between a committed *tree* and either the index file or the working -tree. In other words, 'git-diff-index' wants a tree to be diffed +tree. In other words, 'git diff-index' wants a tree to be diffed against, and before we did the commit, we couldn't do that, because we didn't have anything to diff against. @@ -375,7 +383,7 @@ But now we can do $ git diff-index -p HEAD ---------------- -(where `-p` has the same meaning as it did in 'git-diff-files'), and it +(where `-p` has the same meaning as it did in 'git diff-files'), and it will show us the same difference, but for a totally different reason. Now we're comparing the working tree not against the index file, but against the tree we just wrote. It just so happens that those two @@ -390,7 +398,7 @@ $ git diff HEAD which ends up doing the above for you. -In other words, 'git-diff-index' normally compares a tree against the +In other words, 'git diff-index' normally compares a tree against the working tree, but when given the `\--cached` flag, it is told to instead compare against just the index cache contents, and ignore the current working tree state entirely. Since we just wrote the index @@ -399,7 +407,7 @@ an empty set of differences, and that's exactly what it does. [NOTE] ================ -'git-diff-index' really always uses the index for its +'git diff-index' really always uses the index for its comparisons, and saying that it compares a tree against the working tree is thus not strictly accurate. In particular, the list of files to compare (the "meta-data") *always* comes from the index file, @@ -428,11 +436,11 @@ $ git update-index hello (note how we didn't need the `\--add` flag this time, since git knew about the file already). -Note what happens to the different 'git-diff-\*' versions here. After -we've updated `hello` in the index, `git diff-files -p` now shows no +Note what happens to the different 'git diff-{asterisk}' versions here. +After we've updated `hello` in the index, `git diff-files -p` now shows no differences, but `git diff-index -p HEAD` still *does* show that the current state is different from the state we committed. In fact, now -'git-diff-index' shows the same difference whether we use the `--cached` +'git diff-index' shows the same difference whether we use the `--cached` flag or not, since now the index is coherent with the working tree. Now, since we've updated `hello` in the index, we can commit the new @@ -460,7 +468,7 @@ You've now made your first real git commit. And if you're interested in looking at what `git commit` really does, feel free to investigate: it's a few very simple shell scripts to generate the helpful (?) commit message headers, and a few one-liners that actually do the -commit itself ('git-commit'). +commit itself ('git commit'). Inspecting Changes @@ -468,9 +476,9 @@ Inspecting Changes While creating changes is useful, it's even more useful if you can tell later what changed. The most useful command for this is another of the -'diff' family, namely 'git-diff-tree'. +'diff' family, namely 'git diff-tree'. -'git-diff-tree' can be given two arbitrary trees, and it will tell you the +'git diff-tree' can be given two arbitrary trees, and it will tell you the differences between them. Perhaps even more commonly, though, you can give it just a single commit object, and it will figure out the parent of that commit itself, and show the difference directly. Thus, to get @@ -486,7 +494,7 @@ and it will show what the last commit (in `HEAD`) actually changed. [NOTE] ============ Here is an ASCII art by Jon Loeliger that illustrates how -various diff-\* commands compare things. +various 'diff-{asterisk}' commands compare things. diff-tree +----+ @@ -518,15 +526,15 @@ various diff-\* commands compare things. +-----------+ ============ -More interestingly, you can also give 'git-diff-tree' the `--pretty` flag, +More interestingly, you can also give 'git diff-tree' the `--pretty` flag, which tells it to also show the commit message and author and date of the commit, and you can tell it to show a whole series of diffs. Alternatively, you can tell it to be "silent", and not show the diffs at all, but just show the actual commit message. -In fact, together with the 'git-rev-list' program (which generates a -list of revisions), 'git-diff-tree' ends up being a veritable fount of -changes. A trivial (but very useful) script called 'git-whatchanged' is +In fact, together with the 'git rev-list' program (which generates a +list of revisions), 'git diff-tree' ends up being a veritable fount of +changes. A trivial (but very useful) script called 'git whatchanged' is included with git which does exactly this, and shows a log of recent activities. @@ -553,14 +561,14 @@ When using the above two commands, the initial commit will be shown. If this is a problem because it is huge, you can hide it by setting the log.showroot configuration variable to false. Having this, you can still show it for each command just adding the `\--root` option, -which is a flag for 'git-diff-tree' accepted by both commands. +which is a flag for 'git diff-tree' accepted by both commands. With that, you should now be having some inkling of what git does, and can explore on your own. [NOTE] Most likely, you are not directly using the core -git Plumbing commands, but using Porcelain such as 'git-add', `git-rm' +git Plumbing commands, but using Porcelain such as 'git add', `git-rm' and `git-commit'. @@ -595,14 +603,14 @@ pointer to the state you want to tag, but also a small tag name and message, along with optionally a PGP signature that says that yes, you really did that tag. You create these annotated tags with either the `-a` or -`-s` flag to 'git-tag': +`-s` flag to 'git tag': ---------------- $ git tag -s <tagname> ---------------- which will sign the current `HEAD` (but you can also give it another -argument that specifies the thing to tag, i.e., you could have tagged the +argument that specifies the thing to tag, e.g., you could have tagged the current `mybranch` point by using `git tag <tagname> mybranch`). You normally only do signed tags for major releases or things @@ -642,7 +650,7 @@ and it will be gone. There's no external repository, and there's no history outside the project you created. - if you want to move or duplicate a git repository, you can do so. There - is 'git-clone' command, but if all you want to do is just to + is 'git clone' command, but if all you want to do is just to create a copy of your repository (with all the full history that went along with it), you can do so with a regular `cp -a git-tutorial new-git-tutorial`. @@ -666,7 +674,7 @@ When copying a remote repository, you'll want to at a minimum update the index cache when you do this, and especially with other peoples' repositories you often want to make sure that the index cache is in some known state (you don't know *what* they've done and not yet checked in), -so usually you'll precede the 'git-update-index' with a +so usually you'll precede the 'git update-index' with a ---------------- $ git read-tree --reset HEAD @@ -674,7 +682,7 @@ $ git update-index --refresh ---------------- which will force a total index re-build from the tree pointed to by `HEAD`. -It resets the index contents to `HEAD`, and then the 'git-update-index' +It resets the index contents to `HEAD`, and then the 'git update-index' makes sure to match up all index entries with the checked-out files. If the original repository had uncommitted changes in its working tree, `git update-index --refresh` notices them and @@ -689,8 +697,8 @@ $ git reset and in fact a lot of the common git command combinations can be scripted with the `git xyz` interfaces. You can learn things by just looking at what the various git scripts do. For example, `git reset` used to be -the above two lines implemented in 'git-reset', but some things like -'git-status' and 'git-commit' are slightly more complex scripts around +the above two lines implemented in 'git reset', but some things like +'git status' and 'git commit' are slightly more complex scripts around the basic git commands. Many (most?) public remote repositories will not contain any of @@ -729,7 +737,7 @@ where the `-u` flag means that you want the checkout to keep the index up-to-date (so that you don't have to refresh it afterward), and the `-a` flag means "check out all files" (if you have a stale copy or an older version of a checked out tree you may also need to add the `-f` -flag first, to tell 'git-checkout-index' to *force* overwriting of any old +flag first, to tell 'git checkout-index' to *force* overwriting of any old files). Again, this can all be simplified with @@ -776,7 +784,7 @@ to it. ================================================ If you make the decision to start your new branch at some other point in the history than the current `HEAD`, you can do so by -just telling 'git-checkout' what the base of the checkout would be. +just telling 'git checkout' what the base of the checkout would be. In other words, if you have an earlier tag or branch, you'd just do ------------ @@ -819,7 +827,7 @@ $ git branch <branchname> [startingpoint] which will simply _create_ the branch, but will not do anything further. You can then later -- once you decide that you want to actually develop -on that branch -- switch to that branch with a regular 'git-checkout' +on that branch -- switch to that branch with a regular 'git checkout' with the branchname as the argument. @@ -881,7 +889,7 @@ source. Anyway, let's exit 'gitk' (`^Q` or the File menu), and decide that we want to merge the work we did on the `mybranch` branch into the `master` branch (which is currently our `HEAD` too). To do that, there's a nice -script called 'git-merge', which wants to know which branches you want +script called 'git merge', which wants to know which branches you want to resolve and what the merge is all about: ------------ @@ -925,7 +933,7 @@ $ git commit -i hello which will very loudly warn you that you're now committing a merge (which is correct, so never mind), and you can write a small merge -message about your adventures in 'git-merge'-land. +message about your adventures in 'git merge'-land. After you're done, start up `gitk \--all` to see graphically what the history looks like. Notice that `mybranch` still exists, and you can @@ -950,11 +958,11 @@ $ git show-branch --topo-order --more=1 master mybranch The first two lines indicate that it is showing the two branches and the first line of the commit log message from their top-of-the-tree commits, you are currently on `master` branch -(notice the asterisk `\*` character), and the first column for +(notice the asterisk `{asterisk}` character), and the first column for the later output lines is used to show commits contained in the `master` branch, and the second column for the `mybranch` branch. Three commits are shown along with their log messages. -All of them have non blank characters in the first column (`*` +All of them have non blank characters in the first column (`{asterisk}` shows an ordinary commit on the current branch, `-` is a merge commit), which means they are now part of the `master` branch. Only the "Some work" commit has the plus `+` character in the second column, @@ -963,25 +971,25 @@ commits from the master branch. The string inside brackets before the commit log message is a short name you can use to name the commit. In the above example, 'master' and 'mybranch' are branch heads. 'master^' is the first parent of 'master' -branch head. Please see linkgit:git-rev-parse[1] if you want to +branch head. Please see linkgit:gitrevisions[7] if you want to see more complex cases. [NOTE] -Without the '--more=1' option, 'git-show-branch' would not output the +Without the '--more=1' option, 'git show-branch' would not output the '[master^]' commit, as '[mybranch]' commit is a common ancestor of both 'master' and 'mybranch' tips. Please see linkgit:git-show-branch[1] for details. [NOTE] If there were more commits on the 'master' branch after the merge, the -merge commit itself would not be shown by 'git-show-branch' by +merge commit itself would not be shown by 'git show-branch' by default. You would need to provide '--sparse' option to make the merge commit visible in this case. Now, let's pretend you are the one who did all the work in `mybranch`, and the fruit of your hard work has finally been merged to the `master` branch. Let's go back to `mybranch`, and run -'git-merge' to get the "upstream changes" back to your branch. +'git merge' to get the "upstream changes" back to your branch. ------------ $ git checkout mybranch @@ -993,7 +1001,7 @@ would be different) ---------------- Updating from ae3a2da... to a80b4aa.... -Fast forward (no commit created; -m option ignored) +Fast-forward (no commit created; -m option ignored) example | 1 + hello | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) @@ -1003,7 +1011,7 @@ Because your branch did not contain anything more than what had already been merged into the `master` branch, the merge operation did not actually do a merge. Instead, it just updated the top of the tree of your branch to that of the `master` branch. This is -often called 'fast forward' merge. +often called 'fast-forward' merge. You can run `gitk \--all` again to see how the commit ancestry looks like, or run 'show-branch', which tells you this. @@ -1023,12 +1031,12 @@ Merging external work It's usually much more common that you merge with somebody else than merging with your own branches, so it's worth pointing out that git makes that very easy too, and in fact, it's not that different from -doing a 'git-merge'. In fact, a remote merge ends up being nothing +doing a 'git merge'. In fact, a remote merge ends up being nothing more than "fetch the work from a remote repository into a temporary tag" -followed by a 'git-merge'. +followed by a 'git merge'. Fetching from a remote repository is done by, unsurprisingly, -'git-fetch': +'git fetch': ---------------- $ git fetch <remote-repository> @@ -1084,7 +1092,7 @@ Downloader from http and https URL first obtains the topmost commit object name from the remote site by looking at the specified refname under `repo.git/refs/` directory, and then tries to obtain the -commit object by downloading from `repo.git/objects/xx/xxx\...` +commit object by downloading from `repo.git/objects/xx/xxx...` using the object name of that commit object. Then it reads the commit object to find out its parent commits and the associate tree object; it repeats this process until it gets all the @@ -1095,7 +1103,7 @@ The 'commit walkers' are sometimes also called 'dumb transports', because they do not require any git aware smart server like git Native transport does. Any stock HTTP server that does not even support directory index would suffice. But -you must prepare your repository with 'git-update-server-info' +you must prepare your repository with 'git update-server-info' to help dumb transport downloaders. Once you fetch from the remote repository, you `merge` that @@ -1115,7 +1123,7 @@ argument. [NOTE] You could do without using any branches at all, by keeping as many local repositories as you would like to have -branches, and merging between them with 'git-pull', just like +branches, and merging between them with 'git pull', just like you merge between branches. The advantage of this approach is that it lets you keep a set of files for each `branch` checked out and you may find it easier to switch back and forth if you @@ -1132,7 +1140,7 @@ like this: $ git config remote.linus.url http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/ ------------------------------------------------ -and use the "linus" keyword with 'git-pull' instead of the full URL. +and use the "linus" keyword with 'git pull' instead of the full URL. Examples. @@ -1168,7 +1176,7 @@ $ git show-branch --more=2 master mybranch +* [master^] Some fun. ------------ -Remember, before running 'git-merge', our `master` head was at +Remember, before running 'git merge', our `master` head was at "Some fun." commit, while our `mybranch` head was at "Some work." commit. @@ -1186,16 +1194,16 @@ $ git show-branch * [master] Some fun. ! [mybranch] Some work. -- - + [mybranch] Some work. * [master] Some fun. -*+ [mybranch^] New day. + + [mybranch] Some work. +*+ [master^] Initial commit ------------ Now we are ready to experiment with the merge by hand. `git merge` command, when merging two branches, uses 3-way merge algorithm. First, it finds the common ancestor between them. -The command it uses is 'git-merge-base': +The command it uses is 'git merge-base': ------------ $ mb=$(git merge-base HEAD mybranch) @@ -1204,11 +1212,11 @@ $ mb=$(git merge-base HEAD mybranch) The command writes the commit object name of the common ancestor to the standard output, so we captured its output to a variable, because we will be using it in the next step. By the way, the common -ancestor commit is the "New day." commit in this case. You can +ancestor commit is the "Initial commit" commit in this case. You can tell it by: ------------ -$ git name-rev $mb +$ git name-rev --name-only --tags $mb my-first-tag ------------ @@ -1219,7 +1227,7 @@ this: $ git read-tree -m -u $mb HEAD mybranch ------------ -This is the same 'git-read-tree' command we have already seen, +This is the same 'git read-tree' command we have already seen, but it takes three trees, unlike previous examples. This reads the contents of each tree into different 'stage' in the index file (the first tree goes to stage 1, the second to stage 2, @@ -1237,8 +1245,8 @@ inspect the index file with this command: ------------ $ git ls-files --stage 100644 7f8b141b65fdcee47321e399a2598a235a032422 0 example -100644 263414f423d0e4d70dae8fe53fa34614ff3e2860 1 hello -100644 06fa6a24256dc7e560efa5687fa84b51f0263c3a 2 hello +100644 557db03de997c86a4a028e1ebd3a1ceb225be238 1 hello +100644 ba42a2a96e3027f3333e13ede4ccf4498c3ae942 2 hello 100644 cc44c73eb783565da5831b4d820c962954019b69 3 hello ------------ @@ -1253,15 +1261,15 @@ To look at only non-zero stages, use `\--unmerged` flag: ------------ $ git ls-files --unmerged -100644 263414f423d0e4d70dae8fe53fa34614ff3e2860 1 hello -100644 06fa6a24256dc7e560efa5687fa84b51f0263c3a 2 hello +100644 557db03de997c86a4a028e1ebd3a1ceb225be238 1 hello +100644 ba42a2a96e3027f3333e13ede4ccf4498c3ae942 2 hello 100644 cc44c73eb783565da5831b4d820c962954019b69 3 hello ------------ The next step of merging is to merge these three versions of the file, using 3-way merge. This is done by giving -'git-merge-one-file' command as one of the arguments to -'git-merge-index' command: +'git merge-one-file' command as one of the arguments to +'git merge-index' command: ------------ $ git merge-index git-merge-one-file hello @@ -1270,7 +1278,7 @@ ERROR: Merge conflict in hello fatal: merge program failed ------------ -'git-merge-one-file' script is called with parameters to +'git merge-one-file' script is called with parameters to describe those three versions, and is responsible to leave the merge results in the working tree. It is a fairly straightforward shell script, and @@ -1283,15 +1291,15 @@ the working tree.. This can be seen if you run `ls-files ------------ $ git ls-files --stage 100644 7f8b141b65fdcee47321e399a2598a235a032422 0 example -100644 263414f423d0e4d70dae8fe53fa34614ff3e2860 1 hello -100644 06fa6a24256dc7e560efa5687fa84b51f0263c3a 2 hello +100644 557db03de997c86a4a028e1ebd3a1ceb225be238 1 hello +100644 ba42a2a96e3027f3333e13ede4ccf4498c3ae942 2 hello 100644 cc44c73eb783565da5831b4d820c962954019b69 3 hello ------------ This is the state of the index file and the working file after -'git-merge' returns control back to you, leaving the conflicting +'git merge' returns control back to you, leaving the conflicting merge for you to resolve. Notice that the path `hello` is still -unmerged, and what you see with 'git-diff' at this point is +unmerged, and what you see with 'git diff' at this point is differences since stage 2 (i.e. your version). @@ -1328,8 +1336,8 @@ into it later. Obviously, this repository creation needs to be done only once. [NOTE] -'git-push' uses a pair of programs, -'git-send-pack' on your local machine, and 'git-receive-pack' +'git push' uses a pair of commands, +'git send-pack' on your local machine, and 'git-receive-pack' on the remote machine. The communication between the two over the network internally uses an SSH connection. @@ -1344,7 +1352,7 @@ $ mkdir my-git.git ------------ Then, make that directory into a git repository by running -'git-init', but this time, since its name is not the usual +'git init', but this time, since its name is not the usual `.git`, we do things slightly differently: ------------ @@ -1407,12 +1415,12 @@ $ git repack will do it for you. If you followed the tutorial examples, you would have accumulated about 17 objects in `.git/objects/??/` -directories by now. 'git-repack' tells you how many objects it +directories by now. 'git repack' tells you how many objects it packed, and stores the packed file in `.git/objects/pack` directory. [NOTE] -You will see two files, `pack-\*.pack` and `pack-\*.idx`, +You will see two files, `pack-{asterisk}.pack` and `pack-{asterisk}.idx`, in `.git/objects/pack` directory. They are closely related to each other, and if you ever copy them by hand to a different repository for whatever reason, you should make sure you copy @@ -1420,7 +1428,7 @@ them together. The former holds all the data from the objects in the pack, and the latter holds the index for random access. -If you are paranoid, running 'git-verify-pack' command would +If you are paranoid, running 'git verify-pack' command would detect if you have a corrupt pack, but do not worry too much. Our programs are always perfect ;-). @@ -1487,17 +1495,17 @@ If other people are pulling from your repository over dumb transport protocols (HTTP), you need to keep this repository 'dumb transport friendly'. After `git init`, `$GIT_DIR/hooks/post-update.sample` copied from the standard templates -would contain a call to 'git-update-server-info' +would contain a call to 'git update-server-info' but you need to manually enable the hook with `mv post-update.sample post-update`. This makes sure -'git-update-server-info' keeps the necessary files up-to-date. +'git update-server-info' keeps the necessary files up-to-date. 3. Push into the public repository from your primary repository. -4. 'git-repack' the public repository. This establishes a big +4. 'git repack' the public repository. This establishes a big pack that contains the initial set of objects as the - baseline, and possibly 'git-prune' if the transport + baseline, and possibly 'git prune' if the transport used for pulling from your repository supports packed repositories. @@ -1511,14 +1519,14 @@ You can repack this private repository whenever you feel like. 6. Push your changes to the public repository, and announce it to the public. -7. Every once in a while, 'git-repack' the public repository. +7. Every once in a while, 'git repack' the public repository. Go back to step 5. and continue working. A recommended work cycle for a "subsystem maintainer" who works on that project and has an own "public repository" goes like this: -1. Prepare your work repository, by 'git-clone' the public +1. Prepare your work repository, by 'git clone' the public repository of the "project lead". The URL used for the initial cloning is stored in the remote.origin.url configuration variable. @@ -1533,7 +1541,7 @@ on that project and has an own "public repository" goes like this: point at the repository you are borrowing from. 4. Push into the public repository from your primary - repository. Run 'git-repack', and possibly 'git-prune' if the + repository. Run 'git repack', and possibly 'git prune' if the transport used for pulling from your repository supports packed repositories. @@ -1550,7 +1558,7 @@ like. "project lead" and possibly your "sub-subsystem maintainers" to pull from it. -7. Every once in a while, 'git-repack' the public repository. +7. Every once in a while, 'git repack' the public repository. Go back to step 5. and continue working. @@ -1558,7 +1566,7 @@ A recommended work cycle for an "individual developer" who does not have a "public" repository is somewhat different. It goes like this: -1. Prepare your work repository, by 'git-clone' the public +1. Prepare your work repository, by 'git clone' the public repository of the "project lead" (or a "subsystem maintainer", if you work on a subsystem). The URL used for the initial cloning is stored in the remote.origin.url @@ -1656,8 +1664,8 @@ $ git reset --hard master~2 ------------ You can make sure `git show-branch` matches the state before -those two 'git-merge' you just did. Then, instead of running -two 'git-merge' commands in a row, you would merge these two +those two 'git merge' you just did. Then, instead of running +two 'git merge' commands in a row, you would merge these two branch heads (this is known as 'making an Octopus'): ------------ |