diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-rebase.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 384 |
1 files changed, 327 insertions, 57 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index 924827dc2e..1fbc6ebcde 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt @@ -3,16 +3,16 @@ git-rebase(1) NAME ---- -git-rebase - Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head +git-rebase - Reapply commits on top of another base tip SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] +'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [<options>] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] [<upstream> [<branch>]] -'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] +'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [<options>] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] --root [<branch>] -'git rebase' --continue | --skip | --abort | --edit-todo +'git rebase' --continue | --skip | --abort | --quit | --edit-todo | --show-current-patch DESCRIPTION ----------- @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ remain the checked-out branch. If the upstream branch already contains a change you have made (e.g., because you mailed a patch which was applied upstream), then that commit will be skipped. For example, running `git rebase master` on the -following history (in which A' and A introduce the same set of changes, +following history (in which `A'` and `A` introduce the same set of changes, but have different committer information): ------------ @@ -203,15 +203,7 @@ Alternatively, you can undo the 'git rebase' with CONFIGURATION ------------- -rebase.stat:: - Whether to show a diffstat of what changed upstream since the last - rebase. False by default. - -rebase.autosquash:: - If set to true enable '--autosquash' option by default. - -rebase.autostash:: - If set to true enable '--autostash' option by default. +include::rebase-config.txt[] OPTIONS ------- @@ -243,9 +235,23 @@ leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD. will be reset to where it was when the rebase operation was started. +--quit:: + Abort the rebase operation but HEAD is not reset back to the + original branch. The index and working tree are also left + unchanged as a result. + --keep-empty:: Keep the commits that do not change anything from its parents in the result. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + +--allow-empty-message:: + By default, rebasing commits with an empty message will fail. + This option overrides that behavior, allowing commits with empty + messages to be rebased. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --skip:: Restart the rebasing process by skipping the current patch. @@ -253,6 +259,11 @@ leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD. --edit-todo:: Edit the todo list during an interactive rebase. +--show-current-patch:: + Show the current patch in an interactive rebase or when rebase + is stopped because of conflicts. This is the equivalent of + `git show REBASE_HEAD`. + -m:: --merge:: Use merging strategies to rebase. When the recursive (default) merge @@ -264,6 +275,8 @@ branch on top of the <upstream> branch. Because of this, when a merge conflict happens, the side reported as 'ours' is the so-far rebased series, starting with <upstream>, and 'theirs' is the working branch. In other words, the sides are swapped. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -s <strategy>:: --strategy=<strategy>:: @@ -273,8 +286,10 @@ other words, the sides are swapped. + Because 'git rebase' replays each commit from the working branch on top of the <upstream> branch using the given strategy, using -the 'ours' strategy simply discards all patches from the <branch>, +the 'ours' strategy simply empties all patches from the <branch>, which makes little sense. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -X <strategy-option>:: --strategy-option=<strategy-option>:: @@ -282,10 +297,14 @@ which makes little sense. This implies `--merge` and, if no strategy has been specified, `-s recursive`. Note the reversal of 'ours' and 'theirs' as noted above for the `-m` option. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -S[<keyid>]:: --gpg-sign[=<keyid>]:: - GPG-sign commits. + GPG-sign commits. The `keyid` argument is optional and + defaults to the committer identity; if specified, it must be + stuck to the option without a space. -q:: --quiet:: @@ -315,17 +334,21 @@ which makes little sense. and after each change. When fewer lines of surrounding context exist they all must match. By default no context is ever ignored. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --f:: +--no-ff:: --force-rebase:: - Force a rebase even if the current branch is up-to-date and - the command without `--force` would return without doing anything. +-f:: + Individually replay all rebased commits instead of fast-forwarding + over the unchanged ones. This ensures that the entire history of + the rebased branch is composed of new commits. + -You may find this (or --no-ff with an interactive rebase) helpful after -reverting a topic branch merge, as this option recreates the topic branch with -fresh commits so it can be remerged successfully without needing to "revert -the reversion" (see the -link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.html[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for details). +You may find this helpful after reverting a topic branch merge, as this option +recreates the topic branch with fresh commits so it can be remerged +successfully without needing to "revert the reversion" (see the +link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.html[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for +details). --fork-point:: --no-fork-point:: @@ -346,27 +369,73 @@ default is `--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. --whitespace=<option>:: These flag are passed to the 'git apply' program (see linkgit:git-apply[1]) that applies the patch. - Incompatible with the --interactive option. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --committer-date-is-author-date:: --ignore-date:: These flags are passed to 'git am' to easily change the dates of the rebased commits (see linkgit:git-am[1]). - Incompatible with the --interactive option. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + +--signoff:: + Add a Signed-off-by: trailer to all the rebased commits. Note + that if `--interactive` is given then only commits marked to be + picked, edited or reworded will have the trailer added. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -i:: --interactive:: Make a list of the commits which are about to be rebased. Let the user edit that list before rebasing. This mode can also be used to split commits (see SPLITTING COMMITS below). ++ +The commit list format can be changed by setting the configuration option +rebase.instructionFormat. A customized instruction format will automatically +have the long commit hash prepended to the format. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + +-r:: +--rebase-merges[=(rebase-cousins|no-rebase-cousins)]:: + By default, a rebase will simply drop merge commits from the todo + list, and put the rebased commits into a single, linear branch. + With `--rebase-merges`, the rebase will instead try to preserve + the branching structure within the commits that are to be rebased, + by recreating the merge commits. Any resolved merge conflicts or + manual amendments in these merge commits will have to be + resolved/re-applied manually. ++ +By default, or when `no-rebase-cousins` was specified, commits which do not +have `<upstream>` as direct ancestor will keep their original branch point, +i.e. commits that would be excluded by gitlink:git-log[1]'s +`--ancestry-path` option will keep their original ancestry by default. If +the `rebase-cousins` mode is turned on, such commits are instead rebased +onto `<upstream>` (or `<onto>`, if specified). ++ +The `--rebase-merges` mode is similar in spirit to `--preserve-merges`, but +in contrast to that option works well in interactive rebases: commits can be +reordered, inserted and dropped at will. ++ +It is currently only possible to recreate the merge commits using the +`recursive` merge strategy; Different merge strategies can be used only via +explicit `exec git merge -s <strategy> [...]` commands. ++ +See also REBASING MERGES and INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -p:: --preserve-merges:: - Instead of ignoring merges, try to recreate them. + Recreate merge commits instead of flattening the history by replaying + commits a merge commit introduces. Merge conflict resolutions or manual + amendments to merge commits are not preserved. + This uses the `--interactive` machinery internally, but combining it with the `--interactive` option explicitly is generally not a good idea unless you know what you are doing (see BUGS below). ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -x <cmd>:: --exec <cmd>:: @@ -374,9 +443,6 @@ idea unless you know what you are doing (see BUGS below). final history. <cmd> will be interpreted as one or more shell commands. + -This option can only be used with the `--interactive` option -(see INTERACTIVE MODE below). -+ You may execute several commands by either using one instance of `--exec` with several commands: + @@ -389,6 +455,11 @@ or by giving more than one `--exec`: If `--autosquash` is used, "exec" lines will not be appended for the intermediate commits, and will only appear at the end of each squash/fixup series. ++ +This uses the `--interactive` machinery internally, but it can be run +without an explicit `--interactive`. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --root:: Rebase all commits reachable from <branch>, instead of @@ -399,42 +470,103 @@ squash/fixup series. When used together with both --onto and --preserve-merges, 'all' root commits will be rewritten to have <newbase> as parent instead. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --autosquash:: --no-autosquash:: When the commit log message begins with "squash! ..." (or - "fixup! ..."), and there is a commit whose title begins with - the same ..., automatically modify the todo list of rebase -i - so that the commit marked for squashing comes right after the - commit to be modified, and change the action of the moved - commit from `pick` to `squash` (or `fixup`). Ignores subsequent - "fixup! " or "squash! " after the first, in case you referred to an - earlier fixup/squash with `git commit --fixup/--squash`. -+ -This option is only valid when the '--interactive' option is used. -+ -If the '--autosquash' option is enabled by default using the -configuration variable `rebase.autosquash`, this option can be + "fixup! ..."), and there is already a commit in the todo list that + matches the same `...`, automatically modify the todo list of rebase + -i so that the commit marked for squashing comes right after the + commit to be modified, and change the action of the moved commit + from `pick` to `squash` (or `fixup`). A commit matches the `...` if + the commit subject matches, or if the `...` refers to the commit's + hash. As a fall-back, partial matches of the commit subject work, + too. The recommended way to create fixup/squash commits is by using + the `--fixup`/`--squash` options of linkgit:git-commit[1]. ++ +If the `--autosquash` option is enabled by default using the +configuration variable `rebase.autoSquash`, this option can be used to override and disable this setting. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. ---[no-]autostash:: - Automatically create a temporary stash before the operation +--autostash:: +--no-autostash:: + Automatically create a temporary stash entry before the operation begins, and apply it after the operation ends. This means that you can run rebase on a dirty worktree. However, use with care: the final stash application after a successful rebase might result in non-trivial conflicts. ---no-ff:: - With --interactive, cherry-pick all rebased commits instead of - fast-forwarding over the unchanged ones. This ensures that the - entire history of the rebased branch is composed of new commits. -+ -Without --interactive, this is a synonym for --force-rebase. -+ -You may find this helpful after reverting a topic branch merge, as this option -recreates the topic branch with fresh commits so it can be remerged -successfully without needing to "revert the reversion" (see the -link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.html[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for details). +INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS +-------------------- + +git-rebase has many flags that are incompatible with each other, +predominantly due to the fact that it has three different underlying +implementations: + + * one based on linkgit:git-am[1] (the default) + * one based on git-merge-recursive (merge backend) + * one based on linkgit:git-cherry-pick[1] (interactive backend) + +Flags only understood by the am backend: + + * --committer-date-is-author-date + * --ignore-date + * --whitespace + * --ignore-whitespace + * -C + +Flags understood by both merge and interactive backends: + + * --merge + * --strategy + * --strategy-option + * --allow-empty-message + +Flags only understood by the interactive backend: + + * --[no-]autosquash + * --rebase-merges + * --preserve-merges + * --interactive + * --exec + * --keep-empty + * --autosquash + * --edit-todo + * --root when used in combination with --onto + +Other incompatible flag pairs: + + * --preserve-merges and --interactive + * --preserve-merges and --signoff + * --preserve-merges and --rebase-merges + * --rebase-merges and --strategy + * --rebase-merges and --strategy-option + +BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCES +----------------------- + + * empty commits: + + am-based rebase will drop any "empty" commits, whether the + commit started empty (had no changes relative to its parent to + start with) or ended empty (all changes were already applied + upstream in other commits). + + merge-based rebase does the same. + + interactive-based rebase will by default drop commits that + started empty and halt if it hits a commit that ended up empty. + The `--keep-empty` option exists for interactive rebases to allow + it to keep commits that started empty. + + * directory rename detection: + + merge-based and interactive-based rebases work fine with + directory rename detection. am-based rebases sometimes do not. include::merge-strategies.txt[] @@ -512,6 +644,9 @@ rebasing. If you just want to edit the commit message for a commit, replace the command "pick" with the command "reword". +To drop a commit, replace the command "pick" with "drop", or just +delete the matching line. + If you want to fold two or more commits into one, replace the command "pick" for the second and subsequent commits with "squash" or "fixup". If the commits had different authors, the folded commit will be @@ -644,7 +779,7 @@ on this 'subsystem'. You might end up with a history like the following: ------------ - o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o master + o---o---o---o---o---o---o---o master \ o---o---o---o---o subsystem \ @@ -749,12 +884,147 @@ The ripple effect of a "hard case" recovery is especially bad: 'everyone' downstream from 'topic' will now have to perform a "hard case" recovery too! +REBASING MERGES +--------------- + +The interactive rebase command was originally designed to handle +individual patch series. As such, it makes sense to exclude merge +commits from the todo list, as the developer may have merged the +then-current `master` while working on the branch, only to rebase +all the commits onto `master` eventually (skipping the merge +commits). + +However, there are legitimate reasons why a developer may want to +recreate merge commits: to keep the branch structure (or "commit +topology") when working on multiple, inter-related branches. + +In the following example, the developer works on a topic branch that +refactors the way buttons are defined, and on another topic branch +that uses that refactoring to implement a "Report a bug" button. The +output of `git log --graph --format=%s -5` may look like this: + +------------ +* Merge branch 'report-a-bug' +|\ +| * Add the feedback button +* | Merge branch 'refactor-button' +|\ \ +| |/ +| * Use the Button class for all buttons +| * Extract a generic Button class from the DownloadButton one +------------ + +The developer might want to rebase those commits to a newer `master` +while keeping the branch topology, for example when the first topic +branch is expected to be integrated into `master` much earlier than the +second one, say, to resolve merge conflicts with changes to the +DownloadButton class that made it into `master`. + +This rebase can be performed using the `--rebase-merges` option. +It will generate a todo list looking like this: + +------------ +label onto + +# Branch: refactor-button +reset onto +pick 123456 Extract a generic Button class from the DownloadButton one +pick 654321 Use the Button class for all buttons +label refactor-button + +# Branch: report-a-bug +reset refactor-button # Use the Button class for all buttons +pick abcdef Add the feedback button +label report-a-bug + +reset onto +merge -C a1b2c3 refactor-button # Merge 'refactor-button' +merge -C 6f5e4d report-a-bug # Merge 'report-a-bug' +------------ + +In contrast to a regular interactive rebase, there are `label`, `reset` +and `merge` commands in addition to `pick` ones. + +The `label` command associates a label with the current HEAD when that +command is executed. These labels are created as worktree-local refs +(`refs/rewritten/<label>`) that will be deleted when the rebase +finishes. That way, rebase operations in multiple worktrees linked to +the same repository do not interfere with one another. If the `label` +command fails, it is rescheduled immediately, with a helpful message how +to proceed. + +The `reset` command resets the HEAD, index and worktree to the specified +revision. It is isimilar to an `exec git reset --hard <label>`, but +refuses to overwrite untracked files. If the `reset` command fails, it is +rescheduled immediately, with a helpful message how to edit the todo list +(this typically happens when a `reset` command was inserted into the todo +list manually and contains a typo). + +The `merge` command will merge the specified revision(s) into whatever +is HEAD at that time. With `-C <original-commit>`, the commit message of +the specified merge commit will be used. When the `-C` is changed to +a lower-case `-c`, the message will be opened in an editor after a +successful merge so that the user can edit the message. + +If a `merge` command fails for any reason other than merge conflicts (i.e. +when the merge operation did not even start), it is rescheduled immediately. + +At this time, the `merge` command will *always* use the `recursive` +merge strategy for regular merges, and `octopus` for octopus merges, +strategy, with no way to choose a different one. To work around +this, an `exec` command can be used to call `git merge` explicitly, +using the fact that the labels are worktree-local refs (the ref +`refs/rewritten/onto` would correspond to the label `onto`, for example). + +Note: the first command (`label onto`) labels the revision onto which +the commits are rebased; The name `onto` is just a convention, as a nod +to the `--onto` option. + +It is also possible to introduce completely new merge commits from scratch +by adding a command of the form `merge <merge-head>`. This form will +generate a tentative commit message and always open an editor to let the +user edit it. This can be useful e.g. when a topic branch turns out to +address more than a single concern and wants to be split into two or +even more topic branches. Consider this todo list: + +------------ +pick 192837 Switch from GNU Makefiles to CMake +pick 5a6c7e Document the switch to CMake +pick 918273 Fix detection of OpenSSL in CMake +pick afbecd http: add support for TLS v1.3 +pick fdbaec Fix detection of cURL in CMake on Windows +------------ + +The one commit in this list that is not related to CMake may very well +have been motivated by working on fixing all those bugs introduced by +switching to CMake, but it addresses a different concern. To split this +branch into two topic branches, the todo list could be edited like this: + +------------ +label onto + +pick afbecd http: add support for TLS v1.3 +label tlsv1.3 + +reset onto +pick 192837 Switch from GNU Makefiles to CMake +pick 918273 Fix detection of OpenSSL in CMake +pick fdbaec Fix detection of cURL in CMake on Windows +pick 5a6c7e Document the switch to CMake +label cmake + +reset onto +merge tlsv1.3 +merge cmake +------------ + BUGS ---- The todo list presented by `--preserve-merges --interactive` does not represent the topology of the revision graph. Editing commits and rewording their commit messages should work fine, but attempts to -reorder commits tend to produce counterintuitive results. +reorder commits tend to produce counterintuitive results. Use +`--rebase-merges` in such scenarios instead. For example, an attempt to rearrange ------------ |