diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-rebase.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 577 |
1 files changed, 519 insertions, 58 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index 3277ca1432..4624cfd288 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt @@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ git-rebase - Reapply commits on top of another base tip SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] - [<upstream> [<branch>]] -'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [options] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] +'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [<options>] [--exec <cmd>] + [--onto <newbase> | --keep-base] [<upstream> [<branch>]] +'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [<options>] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>] --root [<branch>] -'git rebase' --continue | --skip | --abort | --quit | --edit-todo | --show-current-patch +'git rebase' (--continue | --skip | --abort | --quit | --edit-todo | --show-current-patch) DESCRIPTION ----------- If <branch> is specified, 'git rebase' will perform an automatic -`git checkout <branch>` before doing anything else. Otherwise +`git switch <branch>` before doing anything else. Otherwise it remains on the current branch. If <upstream> is not specified, the upstream configured in @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Alternatively, you can undo the 'git rebase' with CONFIGURATION ------------- -include::rebase-config.txt[] +include::config/rebase.txt[] OPTIONS ------- @@ -217,6 +217,24 @@ As a special case, you may use "A\...B" as a shortcut for the merge base of A and B if there is exactly one merge base. You can leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD. +--keep-base:: + Set the starting point at which to create the new commits to the + merge base of <upstream> <branch>. Running + 'git rebase --keep-base <upstream> <branch>' is equivalent to + running 'git rebase --onto <upstream>... <upstream>'. ++ +This option is useful in the case where one is developing a feature on +top of an upstream branch. While the feature is being worked on, the +upstream branch may advance and it may not be the best idea to keep +rebasing on top of the upstream but to keep the base commit as-is. ++ +Although both this option and --fork-point find the merge base between +<upstream> and <branch>, this option uses the merge base as the _starting +point_ on which new commits will be created, whereas --fork-point uses +the merge base to determine the _set of commits_ which will be rebased. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + <upstream>:: Upstream branch to compare against. May be any valid commit, not just an existing branch name. Defaults to the configured @@ -238,16 +256,81 @@ leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD. --quit:: Abort the rebase operation but HEAD is not reset back to the original branch. The index and working tree are also left - unchanged as a result. + unchanged as a result. If a temporary stash entry was created + using --autostash, it will be saved to the stash list. + +--apply: + Use applying strategies to rebase (calling `git-am` + internally). This option may become a no-op in the future + once the merge backend handles everything the apply one does. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + +--empty={drop,keep,ask}:: + How to handle commits that are not empty to start and are not + clean cherry-picks of any upstream commit, but which become + empty after rebasing (because they contain a subset of already + upstream changes). With drop (the default), commits that + become empty are dropped. With keep, such commits are kept. + With ask (implied by --interactive), the rebase will halt when + an empty commit is applied allowing you to choose whether to + drop it, edit files more, or just commit the empty changes. + Other options, like --exec, will use the default of drop unless + -i/--interactive is explicitly specified. ++ +Note that commits which start empty are kept (unless --no-keep-empty +is specified), and commits which are clean cherry-picks (as determined +by `git log --cherry-mark ...`) are detected and dropped as a +preliminary step (unless --reapply-cherry-picks is passed). ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. +--no-keep-empty:: --keep-empty:: - Keep the commits that do not change anything from its - parents in the result. + Do not keep commits that start empty before the rebase + (i.e. that do not change anything from its parent) in the + result. The default is to keep commits which start empty, + since creating such commits requires passing the --allow-empty + override flag to `git commit`, signifying that a user is very + intentionally creating such a commit and thus wants to keep + it. ++ +Usage of this flag will probably be rare, since you can get rid of +commits that start empty by just firing up an interactive rebase and +removing the lines corresponding to the commits you don't want. This +flag exists as a convenient shortcut, such as for cases where external +tools generate many empty commits and you want them all removed. ++ +For commits which do not start empty but become empty after rebasing, +see the --empty flag. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + +--reapply-cherry-picks:: +--no-reapply-cherry-picks:: + Reapply all clean cherry-picks of any upstream commit instead + of preemptively dropping them. (If these commits then become + empty after rebasing, because they contain a subset of already + upstream changes, the behavior towards them is controlled by + the `--empty` flag.) ++ +By default (or if `--no-reapply-cherry-picks` is given), these commits +will be automatically dropped. Because this necessitates reading all +upstream commits, this can be expensive in repos with a large number +of upstream commits that need to be read. ++ +`--reapply-cherry-picks` allows rebase to forgo reading all upstream +commits, potentially improving performance. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --allow-empty-message:: - By default, rebasing commits with an empty message will fail. - This option overrides that behavior, allowing commits with empty - messages to be rebased. + No-op. Rebasing commits with an empty message used to fail + and this option would override that behavior, allowing commits + with empty messages to be rebased. Now commits with an empty + message do not cause rebasing to halt. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --skip:: Restart the rebasing process by skipping the current patch. @@ -264,13 +347,15 @@ leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD. --merge:: Use merging strategies to rebase. When the recursive (default) merge strategy is used, this allows rebase to be aware of renames on the - upstream side. + upstream side. This is the default. + Note that a rebase merge works by replaying each commit from the working branch on top of the <upstream> branch. Because of this, when a merge conflict happens, the side reported as 'ours' is the so-far rebased series, starting with <upstream>, and 'theirs' is the working branch. In other words, the sides are swapped. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -s <strategy>:: --strategy=<strategy>:: @@ -280,8 +365,10 @@ other words, the sides are swapped. + Because 'git rebase' replays each commit from the working branch on top of the <upstream> branch using the given strategy, using -the 'ours' strategy simply discards all patches from the <branch>, +the 'ours' strategy simply empties all patches from the <branch>, which makes little sense. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -X <strategy-option>:: --strategy-option=<strategy-option>:: @@ -289,12 +376,22 @@ which makes little sense. This implies `--merge` and, if no strategy has been specified, `-s recursive`. Note the reversal of 'ours' and 'theirs' as noted above for the `-m` option. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + +--rerere-autoupdate:: +--no-rerere-autoupdate:: + Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the + result of auto-conflict resolution if possible. -S[<keyid>]:: --gpg-sign[=<keyid>]:: +--no-gpg-sign:: GPG-sign commits. The `keyid` argument is optional and defaults to the committer identity; if specified, it must be - stuck to the option without a space. + stuck to the option without a space. `--no-gpg-sign` is useful to + countermand both `commit.gpgSign` configuration variable, and + earlier `--gpg-sign`. -q:: --quiet:: @@ -323,18 +420,22 @@ which makes little sense. Ensure at least <n> lines of surrounding context match before and after each change. When fewer lines of surrounding context exist they all must match. By default no context is - ever ignored. + ever ignored. Implies --apply. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --f:: +--no-ff:: --force-rebase:: - Force a rebase even if the current branch is up to date and - the command without `--force` would return without doing anything. +-f:: + Individually replay all rebased commits instead of fast-forwarding + over the unchanged ones. This ensures that the entire history of + the rebased branch is composed of new commits. + -You may find this (or --no-ff with an interactive rebase) helpful after -reverting a topic branch merge, as this option recreates the topic branch with -fresh commits so it can be remerged successfully without needing to "revert -the reversion" (see the -link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.html[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for details). +You may find this helpful after reverting a topic branch merge, as this option +recreates the topic branch with fresh commits so it can be remerged +successfully without needing to "revert the reversion" (see the +link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.html[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for +details). --fork-point:: --no-fork-point:: @@ -348,25 +449,36 @@ When --fork-point is active, 'fork_point' will be used instead of <branch>` command (see linkgit:git-merge-base[1]). If 'fork_point' ends up being empty, the <upstream> will be used as a fallback. + -If either <upstream> or --root is given on the command line, then the -default is `--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. +If <upstream> is given on the command line, then the default is +`--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. ++ +If your branch was based on <upstream> but <upstream> was rewound and +your branch contains commits which were dropped, this option can be used +with `--keep-base` in order to drop those commits from your branch. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --ignore-whitespace:: --whitespace=<option>:: - These flag are passed to the 'git apply' program + These flags are passed to the 'git apply' program (see linkgit:git-apply[1]) that applies the patch. - Incompatible with the --interactive option. + Implies --apply. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --committer-date-is-author-date:: --ignore-date:: These flags are passed to 'git am' to easily change the dates of the rebased commits (see linkgit:git-am[1]). - Incompatible with the --interactive option. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --signoff:: - This flag is passed to 'git am' to sign off all the rebased - commits (see linkgit:git-am[1]). Incompatible with the - --interactive option. + Add a Signed-off-by: trailer to all the rebased commits. Note + that if `--interactive` is given then only commits marked to be + picked, edited or reworded will have the trailer added. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -i:: --interactive:: @@ -377,22 +489,55 @@ default is `--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. The commit list format can be changed by setting the configuration option rebase.instructionFormat. A customized instruction format will automatically have the long commit hash prepended to the format. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. + +-r:: +--rebase-merges[=(rebase-cousins|no-rebase-cousins)]:: + By default, a rebase will simply drop merge commits from the todo + list, and put the rebased commits into a single, linear branch. + With `--rebase-merges`, the rebase will instead try to preserve + the branching structure within the commits that are to be rebased, + by recreating the merge commits. Any resolved merge conflicts or + manual amendments in these merge commits will have to be + resolved/re-applied manually. ++ +By default, or when `no-rebase-cousins` was specified, commits which do not +have `<upstream>` as direct ancestor will keep their original branch point, +i.e. commits that would be excluded by linkgit:git-log[1]'s +`--ancestry-path` option will keep their original ancestry by default. If +the `rebase-cousins` mode is turned on, such commits are instead rebased +onto `<upstream>` (or `<onto>`, if specified). ++ +The `--rebase-merges` mode is similar in spirit to the deprecated +`--preserve-merges` but works with interactive rebases, +where commits can be reordered, inserted and dropped at will. ++ +It is currently only possible to recreate the merge commits using the +`recursive` merge strategy; Different merge strategies can be used only via +explicit `exec git merge -s <strategy> [...]` commands. ++ +See also REBASING MERGES and INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -p:: --preserve-merges:: - Recreate merge commits instead of flattening the history by replaying - commits a merge commit introduces. Merge conflict resolutions or manual - amendments to merge commits are not preserved. + [DEPRECATED: use `--rebase-merges` instead] Recreate merge commits + instead of flattening the history by replaying commits a merge commit + introduces. Merge conflict resolutions or manual amendments to merge + commits are not preserved. + This uses the `--interactive` machinery internally, but combining it with the `--interactive` option explicitly is generally not a good idea unless you know what you are doing (see BUGS below). ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -x <cmd>:: --exec <cmd>:: Append "exec <cmd>" after each line creating a commit in the final history. <cmd> will be interpreted as one or more shell - commands. + commands. Any command that fails will interrupt the rebase, + with exit code 1. + You may execute several commands by either using one instance of `--exec` with several commands: @@ -409,6 +554,8 @@ squash/fixup series. + This uses the `--interactive` machinery internally, but it can be run without an explicit `--interactive`. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --root:: Rebase all commits reachable from <branch>, instead of @@ -419,6 +566,8 @@ without an explicit `--interactive`. When used together with both --onto and --preserve-merges, 'all' root commits will be rewritten to have <newbase> as parent instead. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --autosquash:: --no-autosquash:: @@ -433,11 +582,11 @@ without an explicit `--interactive`. too. The recommended way to create fixup/squash commits is by using the `--fixup`/`--squash` options of linkgit:git-commit[1]. + -This option is only valid when the `--interactive` option is used. -+ If the `--autosquash` option is enabled by default using the configuration variable `rebase.autoSquash`, this option can be used to override and disable this setting. ++ +See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --autostash:: --no-autostash:: @@ -447,17 +596,188 @@ used to override and disable this setting. with care: the final stash application after a successful rebase might result in non-trivial conflicts. ---no-ff:: - With --interactive, cherry-pick all rebased commits instead of - fast-forwarding over the unchanged ones. This ensures that the - entire history of the rebased branch is composed of new commits. -+ -Without --interactive, this is a synonym for --force-rebase. -+ -You may find this helpful after reverting a topic branch merge, as this option -recreates the topic branch with fresh commits so it can be remerged -successfully without needing to "revert the reversion" (see the -link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.html[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for details). +--reschedule-failed-exec:: +--no-reschedule-failed-exec:: + Automatically reschedule `exec` commands that failed. This only makes + sense in interactive mode (or when an `--exec` option was provided). + +INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS +-------------------- + +The following options: + + * --apply + * --committer-date-is-author-date + * --ignore-date + * --ignore-whitespace + * --whitespace + * -C + +are incompatible with the following options: + + * --merge + * --strategy + * --strategy-option + * --allow-empty-message + * --[no-]autosquash + * --rebase-merges + * --preserve-merges + * --interactive + * --exec + * --no-keep-empty + * --empty= + * --reapply-cherry-picks + * --edit-todo + * --root when used in combination with --onto + +In addition, the following pairs of options are incompatible: + + * --preserve-merges and --interactive + * --preserve-merges and --signoff + * --preserve-merges and --rebase-merges + * --preserve-merges and --empty= + * --keep-base and --onto + * --keep-base and --root + * --fork-point and --root + +BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCES +----------------------- + +git rebase has two primary backends: apply and merge. (The apply +backend used to be known as the 'am' backend, but the name led to +confusion as it looks like a verb instead of a noun. Also, the merge +backend used to be known as the interactive backend, but it is now +used for non-interactive cases as well. Both were renamed based on +lower-level functionality that underpinned each.) There are some +subtle differences in how these two backends behave: + +Empty commits +~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +The apply backend unfortunately drops intentionally empty commits, i.e. +commits that started empty, though these are rare in practice. It +also drops commits that become empty and has no option for controlling +this behavior. + +The merge backend keeps intentionally empty commits by default (though +with -i they are marked as empty in the todo list editor, or they can +be dropped automatically with --no-keep-empty). + +Similar to the apply backend, by default the merge backend drops +commits that become empty unless -i/--interactive is specified (in +which case it stops and asks the user what to do). The merge backend +also has an --empty={drop,keep,ask} option for changing the behavior +of handling commits that become empty. + +Directory rename detection +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Due to the lack of accurate tree information (arising from +constructing fake ancestors with the limited information available in +patches), directory rename detection is disabled in the apply backend. +Disabled directory rename detection means that if one side of history +renames a directory and the other adds new files to the old directory, +then the new files will be left behind in the old directory without +any warning at the time of rebasing that you may want to move these +files into the new directory. + +Directory rename detection works with the merge backend to provide you +warnings in such cases. + +Context +~~~~~~~ + +The apply backend works by creating a sequence of patches (by calling +`format-patch` internally), and then applying the patches in sequence +(calling `am` internally). Patches are composed of multiple hunks, +each with line numbers, a context region, and the actual changes. The +line numbers have to be taken with some fuzz, since the other side +will likely have inserted or deleted lines earlier in the file. The +context region is meant to help find how to adjust the line numbers in +order to apply the changes to the right lines. However, if multiple +areas of the code have the same surrounding lines of context, the +wrong one can be picked. There are real-world cases where this has +caused commits to be reapplied incorrectly with no conflicts reported. +Setting diff.context to a larger value may prevent such types of +problems, but increases the chance of spurious conflicts (since it +will require more lines of matching context to apply). + +The merge backend works with a full copy of each relevant file, +insulating it from these types of problems. + +Labelling of conflicts markers +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +When there are content conflicts, the merge machinery tries to +annotate each side's conflict markers with the commits where the +content came from. Since the apply backend drops the original +information about the rebased commits and their parents (and instead +generates new fake commits based off limited information in the +generated patches), those commits cannot be identified; instead it has +to fall back to a commit summary. Also, when merge.conflictStyle is +set to diff3, the apply backend will use "constructed merge base" to +label the content from the merge base, and thus provide no information +about the merge base commit whatsoever. + +The merge backend works with the full commits on both sides of history +and thus has no such limitations. + +Hooks +~~~~~ + +The apply backend has not traditionally called the post-commit hook, +while the merge backend has. Both have called the post-checkout hook, +though the merge backend has squelched its output. Further, both +backends only call the post-checkout hook with the starting point +commit of the rebase, not the intermediate commits nor the final +commit. In each case, the calling of these hooks was by accident of +implementation rather than by design (both backends were originally +implemented as shell scripts and happened to invoke other commands +like 'git checkout' or 'git commit' that would call the hooks). Both +backends should have the same behavior, though it is not entirely +clear which, if any, is correct. We will likely make rebase stop +calling either of these hooks in the future. + +Interruptability +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +The apply backend has safety problems with an ill-timed interrupt; if +the user presses Ctrl-C at the wrong time to try to abort the rebase, +the rebase can enter a state where it cannot be aborted with a +subsequent `git rebase --abort`. The merge backend does not appear to +suffer from the same shortcoming. (See +https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200207132152.GC2868@szeder.dev/ for +details.) + +Commit Rewording +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +When a conflict occurs while rebasing, rebase stops and asks the user +to resolve. Since the user may need to make notable changes while +resolving conflicts, after conflicts are resolved and the user has run +`git rebase --continue`, the rebase should open an editor and ask the +user to update the commit message. The merge backend does this, while +the apply backend blindly applies the original commit message. + +Miscellaneous differences +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +There are a few more behavioral differences that most folks would +probably consider inconsequential but which are mentioned for +completeness: + +* Reflog: The two backends will use different wording when describing + the changes made in the reflog, though both will make use of the + word "rebase". + +* Progress, informational, and error messages: The two backends + provide slightly different progress and informational messages. + Also, the apply backend writes error messages (such as "Your files + would be overwritten...") to stdout, while the merge backend writes + them to stderr. + +* State directories: The two backends keep their state in different + directories under .git/ include::merge-strategies.txt[] @@ -532,6 +852,9 @@ By replacing the command "pick" with the command "edit", you can tell the files and/or the commit message, amend the commit, and continue rebasing. +To interrupt the rebase (just like an "edit" command would do, but without +cherry-picking any commit first), use the "break" command. + If you just want to edit the commit message for a commit, replace the command "pick" with the command "reword". @@ -560,7 +883,8 @@ $ git rebase -i HEAD~5 And move the first patch to the end of the list. -You might want to preserve merges, if you have a history like this: +You might want to recreate merge commits, e.g. if you have a history +like this: ------------------ X @@ -574,7 +898,7 @@ Suppose you want to rebase the side branch starting at "A" to "Q". Make sure that the current HEAD is "B", and call ----------------------------- -$ git rebase -i -p --onto Q O +$ git rebase -i -r --onto Q O ----------------------------- Reordering and editing commits usually creates untested intermediate @@ -716,7 +1040,8 @@ Hard case: The changes are not the same.:: This happens if the 'subsystem' rebase had conflicts, or used `--interactive` to omit, edit, squash, or fixup commits; or if the upstream used one of `commit --amend`, `reset`, or - `filter-branch`. + a full history rewriting command like + https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo[`filter-repo`]. The easy case @@ -727,7 +1052,8 @@ Only works if the changes (patch IDs based on the diff contents) on 'subsystem' did. In that case, the fix is easy because 'git rebase' knows to skip -changes that are already present in the new upstream. So if you say +changes that are already present in the new upstream (unless +`--reapply-cherry-picks` is given). So if you say (assuming you're on 'topic') ------------ $ git rebase subsystem @@ -754,7 +1080,7 @@ NOTE: While an "easy case recovery" sometimes appears to be successful --interactive` will be **resurrected**! The idea is to manually tell 'git rebase' "where the old 'subsystem' -ended and your 'topic' began", that is, what the old merge-base +ended and your 'topic' began", that is, what the old merge base between them was. You will have to find a way to name the last commit of the old 'subsystem', for example: @@ -775,12 +1101,147 @@ The ripple effect of a "hard case" recovery is especially bad: 'everyone' downstream from 'topic' will now have to perform a "hard case" recovery too! +REBASING MERGES +--------------- + +The interactive rebase command was originally designed to handle +individual patch series. As such, it makes sense to exclude merge +commits from the todo list, as the developer may have merged the +then-current `master` while working on the branch, only to rebase +all the commits onto `master` eventually (skipping the merge +commits). + +However, there are legitimate reasons why a developer may want to +recreate merge commits: to keep the branch structure (or "commit +topology") when working on multiple, inter-related branches. + +In the following example, the developer works on a topic branch that +refactors the way buttons are defined, and on another topic branch +that uses that refactoring to implement a "Report a bug" button. The +output of `git log --graph --format=%s -5` may look like this: + +------------ +* Merge branch 'report-a-bug' +|\ +| * Add the feedback button +* | Merge branch 'refactor-button' +|\ \ +| |/ +| * Use the Button class for all buttons +| * Extract a generic Button class from the DownloadButton one +------------ + +The developer might want to rebase those commits to a newer `master` +while keeping the branch topology, for example when the first topic +branch is expected to be integrated into `master` much earlier than the +second one, say, to resolve merge conflicts with changes to the +DownloadButton class that made it into `master`. + +This rebase can be performed using the `--rebase-merges` option. +It will generate a todo list looking like this: + +------------ +label onto + +# Branch: refactor-button +reset onto +pick 123456 Extract a generic Button class from the DownloadButton one +pick 654321 Use the Button class for all buttons +label refactor-button + +# Branch: report-a-bug +reset refactor-button # Use the Button class for all buttons +pick abcdef Add the feedback button +label report-a-bug + +reset onto +merge -C a1b2c3 refactor-button # Merge 'refactor-button' +merge -C 6f5e4d report-a-bug # Merge 'report-a-bug' +------------ + +In contrast to a regular interactive rebase, there are `label`, `reset` +and `merge` commands in addition to `pick` ones. + +The `label` command associates a label with the current HEAD when that +command is executed. These labels are created as worktree-local refs +(`refs/rewritten/<label>`) that will be deleted when the rebase +finishes. That way, rebase operations in multiple worktrees linked to +the same repository do not interfere with one another. If the `label` +command fails, it is rescheduled immediately, with a helpful message how +to proceed. + +The `reset` command resets the HEAD, index and worktree to the specified +revision. It is similar to an `exec git reset --hard <label>`, but +refuses to overwrite untracked files. If the `reset` command fails, it is +rescheduled immediately, with a helpful message how to edit the todo list +(this typically happens when a `reset` command was inserted into the todo +list manually and contains a typo). + +The `merge` command will merge the specified revision(s) into whatever +is HEAD at that time. With `-C <original-commit>`, the commit message of +the specified merge commit will be used. When the `-C` is changed to +a lower-case `-c`, the message will be opened in an editor after a +successful merge so that the user can edit the message. + +If a `merge` command fails for any reason other than merge conflicts (i.e. +when the merge operation did not even start), it is rescheduled immediately. + +At this time, the `merge` command will *always* use the `recursive` +merge strategy for regular merges, and `octopus` for octopus merges, +with no way to choose a different one. To work around +this, an `exec` command can be used to call `git merge` explicitly, +using the fact that the labels are worktree-local refs (the ref +`refs/rewritten/onto` would correspond to the label `onto`, for example). + +Note: the first command (`label onto`) labels the revision onto which +the commits are rebased; The name `onto` is just a convention, as a nod +to the `--onto` option. + +It is also possible to introduce completely new merge commits from scratch +by adding a command of the form `merge <merge-head>`. This form will +generate a tentative commit message and always open an editor to let the +user edit it. This can be useful e.g. when a topic branch turns out to +address more than a single concern and wants to be split into two or +even more topic branches. Consider this todo list: + +------------ +pick 192837 Switch from GNU Makefiles to CMake +pick 5a6c7e Document the switch to CMake +pick 918273 Fix detection of OpenSSL in CMake +pick afbecd http: add support for TLS v1.3 +pick fdbaec Fix detection of cURL in CMake on Windows +------------ + +The one commit in this list that is not related to CMake may very well +have been motivated by working on fixing all those bugs introduced by +switching to CMake, but it addresses a different concern. To split this +branch into two topic branches, the todo list could be edited like this: + +------------ +label onto + +pick afbecd http: add support for TLS v1.3 +label tlsv1.3 + +reset onto +pick 192837 Switch from GNU Makefiles to CMake +pick 918273 Fix detection of OpenSSL in CMake +pick fdbaec Fix detection of cURL in CMake on Windows +pick 5a6c7e Document the switch to CMake +label cmake + +reset onto +merge tlsv1.3 +merge cmake +------------ + BUGS ---- -The todo list presented by `--preserve-merges --interactive` does not -represent the topology of the revision graph. Editing commits and -rewording their commit messages should work fine, but attempts to -reorder commits tend to produce counterintuitive results. +The todo list presented by the deprecated `--preserve-merges --interactive` +does not represent the topology of the revision graph (use `--rebase-merges` +instead). Editing commits and rewording their commit messages should work +fine, but attempts to reorder commits tend to produce counterintuitive results. +Use `--rebase-merges` in such scenarios instead. For example, an attempt to rearrange ------------ |