diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-rebase.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 136 |
1 files changed, 107 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index db1b71d248..be23ad2359 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ SYNOPSIS DESCRIPTION ----------- -If <branch> is specified, 'git-rebase' will perform an automatic +If <branch> is specified, 'git rebase' will perform an automatic `git checkout <branch>` before doing anything else. Otherwise it remains on the current branch. @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ This is useful if F and G were flawed in some way, or should not be part of topicA. Note that the argument to --onto and the <upstream> parameter can be any valid commit-ish. -In case of conflict, 'git-rebase' will stop at the first problematic commit -and leave conflict markers in the tree. You can use 'git-diff' to locate +In case of conflict, 'git rebase' will stop at the first problematic commit +and leave conflict markers in the tree. You can use 'git diff' to locate the markers (<<<<<<) and make edits to resolve the conflict. For each file you edit, you need to tell git that the conflict has been resolved, typically this would be done with @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ desired resolution, you can continue the rebasing process with git rebase --continue -Alternatively, you can undo the 'git-rebase' with +Alternatively, you can undo the 'git rebase' with git rebase --abort @@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ OPTIONS --onto option is not specified, the starting point is <upstream>. May be any valid commit, and not just an existing branch name. ++ +As a special case, you may use "A...B" as a shortcut for the +merge base of A and B if there is exactly one merge base. You can +leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD. <upstream>:: Upstream branch to compare against. May be any valid commit, @@ -228,13 +232,23 @@ OPTIONS Use merging strategies to rebase. When the recursive (default) merge strategy is used, this allows rebase to be aware of renames on the upstream side. ++ +Note that a rebase merge works by replaying each commit from the working +branch on top of the <upstream> branch. Because of this, when a merge +conflict happens, the side reported as 'ours' is the so-far rebased +series, starting with <upstream>, and 'theirs' is the working branch. In +other words, the sides are swapped. -s <strategy>:: --strategy=<strategy>:: Use the given merge strategy. - If there is no `-s` option, a built-in list of strategies - is used instead ('git-merge-recursive' when merging a single - head, 'git-merge-octopus' otherwise). This implies --merge. + If there is no `-s` option 'git merge-recursive' is used + instead. This implies --merge. ++ +Because 'git rebase' replays each commit from the working branch +on top of the <upstream> branch using the given strategy, using +the 'ours' strategy simply discards all patches from the <branch>, +which makes little sense. -q:: --quiet:: @@ -264,19 +278,28 @@ OPTIONS -f:: --force-rebase:: Force the rebase even if the current branch is a descendant - of the commit you are rebasing onto. Normally the command will + of the commit you are rebasing onto. Normally non-interactive rebase will exit with the message "Current branch is up to date" in such a situation. - + Incompatible with the --interactive option. ++ +You may find this (or --no-ff with an interactive rebase) helpful after +reverting a topic branch merge, as this option recreates the topic branch with +fresh commits so it can be remerged successfully without needing to "revert +the reversion" (see the +link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for details). + +--ignore-whitespace:: --whitespace=<option>:: - This flag is passed to the 'git-apply' program + These flag are passed to the 'git apply' program (see linkgit:git-apply[1]) that applies the patch. Incompatible with the --interactive option. --committer-date-is-author-date:: --ignore-date:: - These flags are passed to 'git-am' to easily change the dates + These flags are passed to 'git am' to easily change the dates of the rebased commits (see linkgit:git-am[1]). + Incompatible with the --interactive option. -i:: --interactive:: @@ -287,6 +310,11 @@ OPTIONS -p:: --preserve-merges:: Instead of ignoring merges, try to recreate them. ++ +This uses the `--interactive` machinery internally, but combining it +with the `--interactive` option explicitly is generally not a good +idea unless you know what you are doing (see BUGS below). + --root:: Rebase all commits reachable from <branch>, instead of @@ -297,12 +325,34 @@ OPTIONS root commits will be rewritten to have <newbase> as parent instead. +--autosquash:: + When the commit log message begins with "squash! ..." (or + "fixup! ..."), and there is a commit whose title begins with + the same ..., automatically modify the todo list of rebase -i + so that the commit marked for squashing comes right after the + commit to be modified, and change the action of the moved + commit from `pick` to `squash` (or `fixup`). ++ +This option is only valid when the '--interactive' option is used. + +--no-ff:: + With --interactive, cherry-pick all rebased commits instead of + fast-forwarding over the unchanged ones. This ensures that the + entire history of the rebased branch is composed of new commits. ++ +Without --interactive, this is a synonym for --force-rebase. ++ +You may find this helpful after reverting a topic branch merge, as this option +recreates the topic branch with fresh commits so it can be remerged +successfully without needing to "revert the reversion" (see the +link:howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt[revert-a-faulty-merge How-To] for details). + include::merge-strategies.txt[] NOTES ----- -You should understand the implications of using 'git-rebase' on a +You should understand the implications of using 'git rebase' on a repository that you share. See also RECOVERING FROM UPSTREAM REBASE below. @@ -358,27 +408,33 @@ pick fa1afe1 The oneline of the next commit ... ------------------------------------------- -The oneline descriptions are purely for your pleasure; 'git-rebase' will +The oneline descriptions are purely for your pleasure; 'git rebase' will not look at them but at the commit names ("deadbee" and "fa1afe1" in this example), so do not delete or edit the names. By replacing the command "pick" with the command "edit", you can tell -'git-rebase' to stop after applying that commit, so that you can edit +'git rebase' to stop after applying that commit, so that you can edit the files and/or the commit message, amend the commit, and continue rebasing. +If you just want to edit the commit message for a commit, replace the +command "pick" with the command "reword". + If you want to fold two or more commits into one, replace the command -"pick" with "squash" for the second and subsequent commit. If the -commits had different authors, it will attribute the squashed commit to -the author of the first commit. +"pick" for the second and subsequent commits with "squash" or "fixup". +If the commits had different authors, the folded commit will be +attributed to the author of the first commit. The suggested commit +message for the folded commit is the concatenation of the commit +messages of the first commit and of those with the "squash" command, +but omits the commit messages of commits with the "fixup" command. -In both cases, or when a "pick" does not succeed (because of merge -errors), the loop will stop to let you fix things, and you can continue -the loop with `git rebase --continue`. +'git rebase' will stop when "pick" has been replaced with "edit" or +when a command fails due to merge errors. When you are done editing +and/or resolving conflicts you can continue with `git rebase --continue`. For example, if you want to reorder the last 5 commits, such that what was HEAD~4 becomes the new HEAD. To achieve that, you would call -'git-rebase' like this: +'git rebase' like this: ---------------------- $ git rebase -i HEAD~5 @@ -408,7 +464,7 @@ SPLITTING COMMITS ----------------- In interactive mode, you can mark commits with the action "edit". However, -this does not necessarily mean that 'git-rebase' expects the result of this +this does not necessarily mean that 'git rebase' expects the result of this edit to be exactly one commit. Indeed, you can undo the commit, or you can add other commits. This can be used to split a commit into two: @@ -424,7 +480,7 @@ add other commits. This can be used to split a commit into two: - Now add the changes to the index that you want to have in the first commit. You can use `git add` (possibly interactively) or - 'git-gui' (or both) to do that. + 'git gui' (or both) to do that. - Commit the now-current index with whatever commit message is appropriate now. @@ -435,7 +491,7 @@ add other commits. This can be used to split a commit into two: If you are not absolutely sure that the intermediate revisions are consistent (they compile, pass the testsuite, etc.) you should use -'git-stash' to stash away the not-yet-committed changes +'git stash' to stash away the not-yet-committed changes after each commit, test, and amend the commit if fixes are necessary. @@ -498,8 +554,8 @@ Easy case: The changes are literally the same.:: Hard case: The changes are not the same.:: This happens if the 'subsystem' rebase had conflicts, or used - `\--interactive` to omit, edit, or squash commits; or if the - upstream used one of `commit \--amend`, `reset`, or + `\--interactive` to omit, edit, squash, or fixup commits; or + if the upstream used one of `commit \--amend`, `reset`, or `filter-branch`. @@ -510,7 +566,7 @@ Only works if the changes (patch IDs based on the diff contents) on 'subsystem' are literally the same before and after the rebase 'subsystem' did. -In that case, the fix is easy because 'git-rebase' knows to skip +In that case, the fix is easy because 'git rebase' knows to skip changes that are already present in the new upstream. So if you say (assuming you're on 'topic') ------------ @@ -537,12 +593,12 @@ NOTE: While an "easy case recovery" sometimes appears to be successful example, a commit that was removed via `git rebase \--interactive` will be **resurrected**! -The idea is to manually tell 'git-rebase' "where the old 'subsystem' +The idea is to manually tell 'git rebase' "where the old 'subsystem' ended and your 'topic' began", that is, what the old merge-base between them was. You will have to find a way to name the last commit of the old 'subsystem', for example: -* With the 'subsystem' reflog: after 'git-fetch', the old tip of +* With the 'subsystem' reflog: after 'git fetch', the old tip of 'subsystem' is at `subsystem@\{1}`. Subsequent fetches will increase the number. (See linkgit:git-reflog[1].) @@ -560,6 +616,28 @@ The ripple effect of a "hard case" recovery is especially bad: case" recovery too! +BUGS +---- +The todo list presented by `--preserve-merges --interactive` does not +represent the topology of the revision graph. Editing commits and +rewording their commit messages should work fine, but attempts to +reorder commits tend to produce counterintuitive results. + +For example, an attempt to rearrange +------------ +1 --- 2 --- 3 --- 4 --- 5 +------------ +to +------------ +1 --- 2 --- 4 --- 3 --- 5 +------------ +by moving the "pick 4" line will result in the following history: +------------ + 3 + / +1 --- 2 --- 4 --- 5 +------------ + Authors ------ Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> and |