diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-merge-base.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/git-merge-base.txt | 106 |
1 files changed, 94 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt b/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt index ce5b369985..808426faac 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt @@ -8,7 +8,12 @@ git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS -------- +[verse] 'git merge-base' [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... +'git merge-base' [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... +'git merge-base' --is-ancestor <commit> <commit> +'git merge-base' --independent <commit>... +'git merge-base' --fork-point <ref> [<commit>] DESCRIPTION ----------- @@ -20,17 +25,47 @@ that does not have any better common ancestor is a 'best common ancestor', i.e. a 'merge base'. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. -Among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by -the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a -(possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining -commits on the command line. As the most common special case, specifying only -two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between -the given two commits. +OPERATION MODES +--------------- + +As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the +command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. + +More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, +one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; +the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge +across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the 'merge base' is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from linkgit:git-show-branch[1] when used with the `--merge-base` option. +--octopus:: + Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, + in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior + of 'git show-branch --merge-base'. + +--independent:: + Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of + the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, + among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached + from any other. This mimics the behavior of 'git show-branch + --independent'. + +--is-ancestor:: + Check if the first <commit> is an ancestor of the second <commit>, + and exit with status 0 if true, or with status 1 if not. + Errors are signaled by a non-zero status that is not 1. + +--fork-point:: + Find the point at which a branch (or any history that leads + to <commit>) forked from another branch (or any reference) + <ref>. This does not just look for the common ancestor of + the two commits, but also takes into account the reflog of + <ref> to see if the history leading to <commit> forked from + an earlier incarnation of the branch <ref> (see discussion + on this mode below). + OPTIONS ------- -a:: @@ -75,6 +110,9 @@ and the result of `git merge-base A M` is '1'. Commit '2' is also a common ancestor between 'A' and 'M', but '1' is a better common ancestor, because '2' is an ancestor of '1'. Hence, '2' is not a merge base. +The result of `git merge-base --octopus A B C` is '2', because '2' is +the best common ancestor of all commits. + When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one 'best' common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: @@ -88,13 +126,57 @@ both '1' and '2' are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are 'best' merge bases). When the `--all` option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. -Author ------- -Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> +A common idiom to check "fast-forward-ness" between two commits A +and B is (or at least used to be) to compute the merge base between +A and B, and check if it is the same as A, in which case, A is an +ancestor of B. You will see this idiom used often in older scripts. + + A=$(git rev-parse --verify A) + if test "$A" = "$(git merge-base A B)" + then + ... A is an ancestor of B ... + fi + +In modern git, you can say this in a more direct way: + + if git merge-base --is-ancestor A B + then + ... A is an ancestor of B ... + fi + +instead. -Documentation --------------- -Documentation by David Greaves, Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>. +Discussion on fork-point mode +----------------------------- + +After working on the `topic` branch created with `git checkout -b +topic origin/master`, the history of remote-tracking branch +`origin/master` may have been rewound and rebuilt, leading to a +history of this shape: + + o---B1 + / + ---o---o---B2--o---o---o---B (origin/master) + \ + B3 + \ + Derived (topic) + +where `origin/master` used to point at commits B3, B2, B1 and now it +points at B, and your `topic` branch was started on top of it back +when `origin/master` was at B3. This mode uses the reflog of +`origin/master` to find B3 as the fork point, so that the `topic` +can be rebased on top of the updated `origin/master` by: + + $ fork_point=$(git merge-base --fork-point origin/master topic) + $ git rebase --onto origin/master $fork_point topic + + +See also +-------- +linkgit:git-rev-list[1], +linkgit:git-show-branch[1], +linkgit:git-merge[1] GIT --- |