summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-bisect.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/git-bisect.txt136
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ac4b4965a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+git-bisect(1)
+=============
+
+NAME
+----
+git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+--------
+'git bisect' <subcommand> <options>
+
+DESCRIPTION
+-----------
+The command takes various subcommands, and different options
+depending on the subcommand:
+
+ git bisect start [<paths>...]
+ git bisect bad <rev>
+ git bisect good <rev>
+ git bisect reset [<branch>]
+ git bisect visualize
+ git bisect replay <logfile>
+ git bisect log
+
+This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive
+the binary search process to find which change introduced a bug,
+given an old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit
+object name.
+
+The way you use it is:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ git bisect start
+$ git bisect bad # Current version is bad
+$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
+ # tested that was good
+------------------------------------------------
+
+When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will
+bisect the revision tree and say something like:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this
+------------------------------------------------
+
+and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and boot
+it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just do
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ git bisect good # this one is good
+------------------------------------------------
+
+which will now say
+
+------------------------------------------------
+Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
+------------------------------------------------
+
+and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending on
+whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect bad",
+and ask for the next bisection.
+
+Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first bad
+kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
+
+Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ git bisect reset
+------------------------------------------------
+
+to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the bisection
+branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, actually: it will
+reset the bisection state, and before it does that it checks that you're
+not using some old bisection branch).
+
+During the bisection process, you can say
+
+------------
+$ git bisect visualize
+------------
+
+to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`.
+
+The good/bad input is logged, and `git bisect
+log` shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its
+output somewhere and save it in a file, and run
+
+------------
+$ git bisect replay that-file
+------------
+
+if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a
+revision.
+
+If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect
+suggested to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change
+the commit introduces is known not to work in your environment
+and you know it does not have anything to do with the bug you
+are chasing), you may want to find a near-by commit and try that
+instead. It goes something like this:
+
+------------
+$ git bisect good/bad # previous round was good/bad.
+Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
+$ git bisect visualize # oops, that is uninteresting.
+$ git reset --hard HEAD~3 # try 3 revs before what
+ # was suggested
+------------
+
+Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that,
+tell bisect what the result was as usual.
+
+You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what
+part of the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking
+down, by giving paths parameters when you say `bisect start`,
+like this:
+
+------------
+$ git bisect start arch/i386 include/asm-i386
+------------
+
+
+Author
+------
+Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
+
+Documentation
+-------------
+Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
+
+GIT
+---
+Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
+