diff options
-rw-r--r-- | read-cache.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | split-index.c | 57 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | split-index.h | 1 |
3 files changed, 47 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c index 0d0081a11b..8da84ae2d1 100644 --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -1877,15 +1877,9 @@ int discard_index(struct index_state *istate) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) { - if (istate->cache[i]->index && - istate->split_index && - istate->split_index->base && - istate->cache[i]->index <= istate->split_index->base->cache_nr && - istate->cache[i] == istate->split_index->base->cache[istate->cache[i]->index - 1]) - continue; + unshare_split_index(istate, 1); + for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) free(istate->cache[i]); - } resolve_undo_clear_index(istate); istate->cache_nr = 0; istate->cache_changed = 0; diff --git a/split-index.c b/split-index.c index f519e60f87..49bd197f71 100644 --- a/split-index.c +++ b/split-index.c @@ -73,10 +73,17 @@ void move_cache_to_base_index(struct index_state *istate) int i; /* - * do not delete old si->base, its index entries may be shared - * with istate->cache[]. Accept a bit of leaking here because - * this code is only used by short-lived update-index. + * If "si" is shared with another index_state (e.g. by + * unpack-trees code), we will need to duplicate split_index + * struct. It's not happening now though, luckily. */ + assert(si->refcount <= 1); + + unshare_split_index(istate, 0); + if (si->base) { + discard_index(si->base); + free(si->base); + } si->base = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*si->base)); si->base->version = istate->version; /* zero timestamp disables racy test in ce_write_index() */ @@ -275,11 +282,41 @@ void finish_writing_split_index(struct index_state *istate) istate->cache_nr = si->saved_cache_nr; } +void unshare_split_index(struct index_state *istate, int discard) +{ + struct split_index *si = istate->split_index; + int i; + + if (!si || !si->base) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) { + struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i]; + struct cache_entry *new = NULL; + + if (!ce->index || + ce->index > si->base->cache_nr || + ce != si->base->cache[ce->index - 1]) + continue; + + if (!discard) { + int len = ce_namelen(ce); + new = xcalloc(1, cache_entry_size(len)); + copy_cache_entry(new, ce); + memcpy(new->name, ce->name, len); + new->index = 0; + } + istate->cache[i] = new; + } +} + + void discard_split_index(struct index_state *istate) { struct split_index *si = istate->split_index; if (!si) return; + unshare_split_index(istate, 0); istate->split_index = NULL; si->refcount--; if (si->refcount) @@ -328,14 +365,8 @@ void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate) void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate) { - if (istate->split_index) { - /* - * can't discard_split_index(&the_index); because that - * will destroy split_index->base->cache[], which may - * be shared with the_index.cache[]. So yeah we're - * leaking a bit here. - */ - istate->split_index = NULL; - istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED; - } + if (!istate->split_index) + return; + discard_split_index(istate); + istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED; } diff --git a/split-index.h b/split-index.h index df91c1bda8..65c0f09b2b 100644 --- a/split-index.h +++ b/split-index.h @@ -33,5 +33,6 @@ void finish_writing_split_index(struct index_state *istate); void discard_split_index(struct index_state *istate); void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate); void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate); +void unshare_split_index(struct index_state *istate, int discard); #endif |