diff options
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh | 111 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh | 466 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh | 135 |
3 files changed, 393 insertions, 319 deletions
diff --git a/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh index c5b57f40c3..b047cf1c1c 100755 --- a/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh +++ b/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ test_description="recursive merge corner cases w/ renames but not criss-crosses" . ./test-lib.sh -test_expect_success 'setup rename/delete + untracked file' ' +test_setup_rename_delete_untracked () { test_create_repo rename-delete-untracked && ( cd rename-delete-untracked && @@ -29,9 +29,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/delete + untracked file' ' git commit -m track-people-instead-of-objects && echo "Myyy PRECIOUSSS" >ring ) -' +} test_expect_success "Does git preserve Gollum's precious artifact?" ' + test_setup_rename_delete_untracked && ( cd rename-delete-untracked && @@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ test_expect_success "Does git preserve Gollum's precious artifact?" ' # # We should be able to merge B & C cleanly -test_expect_success 'setup rename/modify/add-source conflict' ' +test_setup_rename_modify_add_source () { test_create_repo rename-modify-add-source && ( cd rename-modify-add-source && @@ -70,9 +71,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/modify/add-source conflict' ' git add a && git commit -m C ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'rename/modify/add-source conflict resolvable' ' + test_setup_rename_modify_add_source && ( cd rename-modify-add-source && @@ -88,7 +90,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'rename/modify/add-source conflict resolvable' ' ) ' -test_expect_success 'setup resolvable conflict missed if rename missed' ' +test_setup_break_detection_1 () { test_create_repo break-detection-1 && ( cd break-detection-1 && @@ -110,9 +112,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup resolvable conflict missed if rename missed' ' git add a && git commit -m C ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'conflict caused if rename not detected' ' + test_setup_break_detection_1 && ( cd break-detection-1 && @@ -135,7 +138,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'conflict caused if rename not detected' ' ) ' -test_expect_success 'setup conflict resolved wrong if rename missed' ' +test_setup_break_detection_2 () { test_create_repo break-detection-2 && ( cd break-detection-2 && @@ -160,9 +163,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup conflict resolved wrong if rename missed' ' git add a && git commit -m E ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'missed conflict if rename not detected' ' + test_setup_break_detection_2 && ( cd break-detection-2 && @@ -182,7 +186,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'missed conflict if rename not detected' ' # Commit B: rename a->b # Commit C: rename a->b, add unrelated a -test_expect_success 'setup undetected rename/add-source causes data loss' ' +test_setup_break_detection_3 () { test_create_repo break-detection-3 && ( cd break-detection-3 && @@ -202,9 +206,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup undetected rename/add-source causes data loss' ' git add a && git commit -m C ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'detect rename/add-source and preserve all data' ' + test_setup_break_detection_3 && ( cd break-detection-3 && @@ -231,6 +236,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'detect rename/add-source and preserve all data' ' ' test_expect_failure 'detect rename/add-source and preserve all data, merge other way' ' + test_setup_break_detection_3 && ( cd break-detection-3 && @@ -256,10 +262,10 @@ test_expect_failure 'detect rename/add-source and preserve all data, merge other ) ' -test_expect_success 'setup content merge + rename/directory conflict' ' - test_create_repo rename-directory-1 && +test_setup_rename_directory () { + test_create_repo rename-directory-$1 && ( - cd rename-directory-1 && + cd rename-directory-$1 && printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n" >file && git add file && @@ -290,11 +296,12 @@ test_expect_success 'setup content merge + rename/directory conflict' ' test_tick && git commit -m left ) -' +} test_expect_success 'rename/directory conflict + clean content merge' ' + test_setup_rename_directory 1a && ( - cd rename-directory-1 && + cd rename-directory-1a && git checkout left-clean^0 && @@ -320,8 +327,9 @@ test_expect_success 'rename/directory conflict + clean content merge' ' ' test_expect_success 'rename/directory conflict + content merge conflict' ' + test_setup_rename_directory 1b && ( - cd rename-directory-1 && + cd rename-directory-1b && git reset --hard && git clean -fdqx && @@ -358,7 +366,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rename/directory conflict + content merge conflict' ' ) ' -test_expect_success 'setup content merge + rename/directory conflict w/ disappearing dir' ' +test_setup_rename_directory_2 () { test_create_repo rename-directory-2 && ( cd rename-directory-2 && @@ -385,9 +393,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup content merge + rename/directory conflict w/ disappea test_tick && git commit -m left ) -' +} test_expect_success 'disappearing dir in rename/directory conflict handled' ' + test_setup_rename_directory_2 && ( cd rename-directory-2 && @@ -416,10 +425,10 @@ test_expect_success 'disappearing dir in rename/directory conflict handled' ' # Commit A: rename a->b, modifying b too # Commit B: modify a, add different b -test_expect_success 'setup rename-with-content-merge vs. add' ' - test_create_repo rename-with-content-merge-and-add && +test_setup_rename_with_content_merge_and_add () { + test_create_repo rename-with-content-merge-and-add-$1 && ( - cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add && + cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add-$1 && test_seq 1 5 >a && git add a && @@ -438,11 +447,12 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename-with-content-merge vs. add' ' git add a b && git commit -m B ) -' +} test_expect_success 'handle rename-with-content-merge vs. add' ' + test_setup_rename_with_content_merge_and_add AB && ( - cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add && + cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add-AB && git checkout A^0 && @@ -483,8 +493,9 @@ test_expect_success 'handle rename-with-content-merge vs. add' ' ' test_expect_success 'handle rename-with-content-merge vs. add, merge other way' ' + test_setup_rename_with_content_merge_and_add BA && ( - cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add && + cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add-BA && git reset --hard && git clean -fdx && @@ -539,7 +550,7 @@ test_expect_success 'handle rename-with-content-merge vs. add, merge other way' # * The working copy should have two files, both of form c~<unique>; does it? # * Nothing else should be present. Is anything? -test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename (2to1) + modify/modify' ' +test_setup_rename_rename_2to1 () { test_create_repo rename-rename-2to1 && ( cd rename-rename-2to1 && @@ -562,9 +573,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename (2to1) + modify/modify' ' git add a && git commit -m C ) -' +} test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' ' + test_setup_rename_rename_2to1 && ( cd rename-rename-2to1 && @@ -610,7 +622,7 @@ test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' ' # Commit A: new file: a # Commit B: rename a->b # Commit C: rename a->c -test_expect_success 'setup simple rename/rename (1to2) conflict' ' +test_setup_rename_rename_1to2 () { test_create_repo rename-rename-1to2 && ( cd rename-rename-1to2 && @@ -631,9 +643,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup simple rename/rename (1to2) conflict' ' test_tick && git commit -m C ) -' +} test_expect_success 'merge has correct working tree contents' ' + test_setup_rename_rename_1to2 && ( cd rename-rename-1to2 && @@ -667,7 +680,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge has correct working tree contents' ' # # Merging of B & C should NOT be clean; there's a rename/rename conflict -test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-source conflict' ' +test_setup_rename_rename_1to2_add_source_1 () { test_create_repo rename-rename-1to2-add-source-1 && ( cd rename-rename-1to2-add-source-1 && @@ -687,9 +700,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-source conflict' ' git add a && git commit -m C ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'detect conflict with rename/rename(1to2)/add-source merge' ' + test_setup_rename_rename_1to2_add_source_1 && ( cd rename-rename-1to2-add-source-1 && @@ -714,7 +728,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'detect conflict with rename/rename(1to2)/add-source merge' ) ' -test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-source resolvable conflict' ' +test_setup_rename_rename_1to2_add_source_2 () { test_create_repo rename-rename-1to2-add-source-2 && ( cd rename-rename-1to2-add-source-2 && @@ -737,9 +751,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-source resolvable conflict' ' test_tick && git commit -m two ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'rename/rename/add-source still tracks new a file' ' + test_setup_rename_rename_1to2_add_source_2 && ( cd rename-rename-1to2-add-source-2 && @@ -759,7 +774,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'rename/rename/add-source still tracks new a file' ' ) ' -test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest conflict' ' +test_setup_rename_rename_1to2_add_dest () { test_create_repo rename-rename-1to2-add-dest && ( cd rename-rename-1to2-add-dest && @@ -784,9 +799,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest conflict' ' test_tick && git commit -m two ) -' +} test_expect_success 'rename/rename/add-dest merge still knows about conflicting file versions' ' + test_setup_rename_rename_1to2_add_dest && ( cd rename-rename-1to2-add-dest && @@ -838,7 +854,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rename/rename/add-dest merge still knows about conflicting # Commit B: rename foo->bar # Expected: CONFLICT (rename/add/delete), two-way merged bar -test_expect_success 'rad-setup: rename/add/delete conflict' ' +test_setup_rad () { test_create_repo rad && ( cd rad && @@ -860,9 +876,10 @@ test_expect_success 'rad-setup: rename/add/delete conflict' ' git mv foo bar && git commit -m "rename foo to bar" ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'rad-check: rename/add/delete conflict' ' + test_setup_rad && ( cd rad && @@ -904,7 +921,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'rad-check: rename/add/delete conflict' ' # Commit B: rename bar->baz, rm foo # Expected: CONFLICT (rename/rename/delete/delete), two-way merged baz -test_expect_success 'rrdd-setup: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' ' +test_setup_rrdd () { test_create_repo rrdd && ( cd rrdd && @@ -927,9 +944,10 @@ test_expect_success 'rrdd-setup: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' ' git rm foo && git commit -m "Rename bar, remove foo" ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'rrdd-check: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' ' + test_setup_rrdd && ( cd rrdd && @@ -973,7 +991,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'rrdd-check: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' ' # Expected: six CONFLICT(rename/rename) messages, each path in two of the # multi-way merged contents found in two, four, six -test_expect_success 'mod6-setup: chains of rename/rename(1to2) and rename/rename(2to1)' ' +test_setup_mod6 () { test_create_repo mod6 && ( cd mod6 && @@ -1009,9 +1027,10 @@ test_expect_success 'mod6-setup: chains of rename/rename(1to2) and rename/rename test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} test_expect_failure 'mod6-check: chains of rename/rename(1to2) and rename/rename(2to1)' ' + test_setup_mod6 && ( cd mod6 && @@ -1108,7 +1127,8 @@ test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames() { # files. Is it present? # 4) There should not be any three~* files in the working # tree - test_expect_success "setup simple $sideL/$sideR conflict" ' + test_setup_collision_conflict () { + #test_expect_success "setup simple $sideL/$sideR conflict" ' test_create_repo simple_${sideL}_${sideR} && ( cd simple_${sideL}_${sideR} && @@ -1185,9 +1205,11 @@ test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames() { fi && test_tick && git commit -m R ) - ' + #' + } test_expect_success "check simple $sideL/$sideR conflict" ' + test_setup_collision_conflict && ( cd simple_${sideL}_${sideR} && @@ -1254,7 +1276,7 @@ test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames add add # # So, we have four different conflicting files that all end up at path # 'three'. -test_expect_success 'setup nested conflicts from rename/rename(2to1)' ' +test_setup_nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename () { test_create_repo nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename && ( cd nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename && @@ -1305,9 +1327,10 @@ test_expect_success 'setup nested conflicts from rename/rename(2to1)' ' git add one three && test_tick && git commit -m german ) -' +} test_expect_success 'check nested conflicts from rename/rename(2to1)' ' + test_setup_nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename && ( cd nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename && diff --git a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh index 32cdd1f493..bd2f97ba95 100755 --- a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh +++ b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ test_description="recursive merge with directory renames" # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e/f} # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e/f} -test_expect_success '1a-setup: Simple directory rename detection' ' +test_setup_1a () { test_create_repo 1a && ( cd 1a && @@ -67,9 +67,10 @@ test_expect_success '1a-setup: Simple directory rename detection' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '1a-check: Simple directory rename detection' ' +test_expect_success '1a: Simple directory rename detection' ' + test_setup_1a && ( cd 1a && @@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ test_expect_success '1a-check: Simple directory rename detection' ' # Commit B: y/{b,c,d} # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e} -test_expect_success '1b-setup: Merge a directory with another' ' +test_setup_1b () { test_create_repo 1b && ( cd 1b && @@ -134,9 +135,10 @@ test_expect_success '1b-setup: Merge a directory with another' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '1b-check: Merge a directory with another' ' +test_expect_success '1b: Merge a directory with another' ' + test_setup_1b && ( cd 1b && @@ -165,7 +167,7 @@ test_expect_success '1b-check: Merge a directory with another' ' # Commit B: z/{b,c,d} # Expected: y/{b,c,d} (because x/d -> z/d -> y/d) -test_expect_success '1c-setup: Transitive renaming' ' +test_setup_1c () { test_create_repo 1c && ( cd 1c && @@ -193,9 +195,10 @@ test_expect_success '1c-setup: Transitive renaming' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '1c-check: Transitive renaming' ' +test_expect_success '1c: Transitive renaming' ' + test_setup_1c && ( cd 1c && @@ -227,7 +230,7 @@ test_expect_success '1c-check: Transitive renaming' ' # Note: y/m & z/n should definitely move into x. By the same token, both # y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 should too...giving us a conflict. -test_expect_success '1d-setup: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' ' +test_setup_1d () { test_create_repo 1d && ( cd 1d && @@ -262,9 +265,10 @@ test_expect_success '1d-setup: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) con test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '1d-check: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' ' +test_expect_success '1d: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' ' + test_setup_1d && ( cd 1d && @@ -313,7 +317,7 @@ test_expect_success '1d-check: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) con # Commit B: z/{oldb,oldc,d} # Expected: y/{newb,newc,d} -test_expect_success '1e-setup: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' ' +test_setup_1e () { test_create_repo 1e && ( cd 1e && @@ -342,9 +346,10 @@ test_expect_success '1e-setup: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed t test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '1e-check: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' ' +test_expect_success '1e: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' ' + test_setup_1e && ( cd 1e && @@ -371,7 +376,7 @@ test_expect_success '1e-check: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed t # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f} # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f,g} -test_expect_success '1f-setup: Split a directory into two other directories' ' +test_setup_1f () { test_create_repo 1f && ( cd 1f && @@ -408,9 +413,10 @@ test_expect_success '1f-setup: Split a directory into two other directories' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '1f-check: Split a directory into two other directories' ' +test_expect_success '1f: Split a directory into two other directories' ' + test_setup_1f && ( cd 1f && @@ -459,7 +465,7 @@ test_expect_success '1f-check: Split a directory into two other directories' ' # Commit A: y/b, w/c # Commit B: z/{b,c,d} # Expected: y/b, w/c, z/d, with warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict -test_expect_success '2a-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' +test_setup_2a () { test_create_repo 2a && ( cd 2a && @@ -489,9 +495,10 @@ test_expect_success '2a-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '2a-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' +test_expect_success '2a: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' + test_setup_2a && ( cd 2a && @@ -520,7 +527,7 @@ test_expect_success '2a-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal # Commit A: y/b, w/c # Commit B: z/{b,c}, x/d # Expected: y/b, w/c, x/d; No warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict -test_expect_success '2b-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' +test_setup_2b () { test_create_repo 2b && ( cd 2b && @@ -551,9 +558,10 @@ test_expect_success '2b-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '2b-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' +test_expect_success '2b: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' + test_setup_2b && ( cd 2b && @@ -601,7 +609,7 @@ test_expect_success '2b-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal # Commit A: z/{b,c,d} (no change) # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/d # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d -test_expect_success '3a-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' ' +test_setup_3a () { test_create_repo 3a && ( cd 3a && @@ -632,9 +640,10 @@ test_expect_success '3a-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on ot test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '3a-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' ' +test_expect_success '3a: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' ' + test_setup_3a && ( cd 3a && @@ -664,7 +673,7 @@ test_expect_success '3a-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on ot # get it involved in directory rename detection. If it were, we might # end up with CONFLICT:(z/d -> y/d vs. x/d vs. w/d), i.e. a # rename/rename/rename(1to3) conflict, which is just weird. -test_expect_success '3b-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' ' +test_setup_3b () { test_create_repo 3b && ( cd 3b && @@ -697,9 +706,10 @@ test_expect_success '3b-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on cu test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '3b-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' ' +test_expect_success '3b: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' ' + test_setup_3b && ( cd 3b && @@ -786,7 +796,7 @@ test_expect_success '3b-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on cu # Expected: y/{b,c,d}, z/{e,f} # NOTE: Even though most files from z moved to y, we don't want f to follow. -test_expect_success '4a-setup: Directory split, with original directory still present' ' +test_setup_4a () { test_create_repo 4a && ( cd 4a && @@ -818,9 +828,10 @@ test_expect_success '4a-setup: Directory split, with original directory still pr test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '4a-check: Directory split, with original directory still present' ' +test_expect_success '4a: Directory split, with original directory still present' ' + test_setup_4a && ( cd 4a && @@ -874,7 +885,7 @@ test_expect_success '4a-check: Directory split, with original directory still pr # of history, giving us no way to represent this conflict in the # index. -test_expect_success '5a-setup: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' ' +test_setup_5a () { test_create_repo 5a && ( cd 5a && @@ -907,9 +918,10 @@ test_expect_success '5a-setup: Merge directories, other side adds files to origi test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '5a-check: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' ' +test_expect_success '5a: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' ' + test_setup_5a && ( cd 5a && @@ -948,7 +960,7 @@ test_expect_success '5a-check: Merge directories, other side adds files to origi # cause us to bail on directory rename detection for that path, falling # back to git behavior without the directory rename detection. -test_expect_success '5b-setup: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' ' +test_setup_5b () { test_create_repo 5b && ( cd 5b && @@ -981,9 +993,10 @@ test_expect_success '5b-setup: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflic test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '5b-check: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' ' +test_expect_success '5b: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' ' + test_setup_5b && ( cd 5b && @@ -1024,7 +1037,7 @@ test_expect_success '5b-check: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflic # y/d are y/d_2 and y/d_4. We still do the move from z/e to y/e, # though, because it doesn't have anything in the way. -test_expect_success '5c-setup: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' ' +test_setup_5c () { test_create_repo 5c && ( cd 5c && @@ -1061,9 +1074,10 @@ test_expect_success '5c-setup: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/renam test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '5c-check: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' ' +test_expect_success '5c: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' ' + test_setup_5c && ( cd 5c && @@ -1113,7 +1127,7 @@ test_expect_success '5c-check: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/renam # detection for z/d_2, but that doesn't prevent us from applying the # directory rename detection for z/f -> y/f. -test_expect_success '5d-setup: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' ' +test_setup_5d () { test_create_repo 5d && ( cd 5d && @@ -1145,9 +1159,10 @@ test_expect_success '5d-setup: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory ren test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '5d-check: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' ' +test_expect_success '5d: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' ' + test_setup_5d && ( cd 5d && @@ -1205,7 +1220,7 @@ test_expect_success '5d-check: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory ren # them under y/ doesn't accidentally catch z/d and make it look like # it is also involved in a rename/delete conflict. -test_expect_success '6a-setup: Tricky rename/delete' ' +test_setup_6a () { test_create_repo 6a && ( cd 6a && @@ -1235,9 +1250,10 @@ test_expect_success '6a-setup: Tricky rename/delete' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '6a-check: Tricky rename/delete' ' +test_expect_success '6a: Tricky rename/delete' ' + test_setup_6a && ( cd 6a && @@ -1271,7 +1287,7 @@ test_expect_success '6a-check: Tricky rename/delete' ' # but B did that rename and still decided to put the file into z/, # so we probably shouldn't apply directory rename detection for it. -test_expect_success '6b-setup: Same rename done on both sides' ' +test_setup_6b () { test_create_repo 6b && ( cd 6b && @@ -1300,9 +1316,10 @@ test_expect_success '6b-setup: Same rename done on both sides' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '6b-check: Same rename done on both sides' ' +test_expect_success '6b: Same rename done on both sides' ' + test_setup_6b && ( cd 6b && @@ -1334,7 +1351,7 @@ test_expect_success '6b-check: Same rename done on both sides' ' # NOTE: Seems obvious, but just checking that the implementation doesn't # "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}. -test_expect_success '6c-setup: Rename only done on same side' ' +test_setup_6c () { test_create_repo 6c && ( cd 6c && @@ -1362,9 +1379,10 @@ test_expect_success '6c-setup: Rename only done on same side' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '6c-check: Rename only done on same side' ' +test_expect_success '6c: Rename only done on same side' ' + test_setup_6c && ( cd 6c && @@ -1396,7 +1414,7 @@ test_expect_success '6c-check: Rename only done on same side' ' # NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}. -test_expect_success '6d-setup: We do not always want transitive renaming' ' +test_setup_6d () { test_create_repo 6d && ( cd 6d && @@ -1424,9 +1442,10 @@ test_expect_success '6d-setup: We do not always want transitive renaming' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '6d-check: We do not always want transitive renaming' ' +test_expect_success '6d: We do not always want transitive renaming' ' + test_setup_6d && ( cd 6d && @@ -1458,7 +1477,7 @@ test_expect_success '6d-check: We do not always want transitive renaming' ' # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c} + # add/add conflict on y/d_1 vs y/d_2. -test_expect_success '6e-setup: Add/add from one side' ' +test_setup_6e () { test_create_repo 6e && ( cd 6e && @@ -1487,9 +1506,10 @@ test_expect_success '6e-setup: Add/add from one side' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '6e-check: Add/add from one side' ' +test_expect_success '6e: Add/add from one side' ' + test_setup_6e && ( cd 6e && @@ -1552,7 +1572,7 @@ test_expect_success '6e-check: Add/add from one side' ' # Expected: y/d, CONFLICT(rename/rename for both z/b and z/c) # NOTE: There's a rename of z/ here, y/ has more renames, so z/d -> y/d. -test_expect_success '7a-setup: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' ' +test_setup_7a () { test_create_repo 7a && ( cd 7a && @@ -1583,9 +1603,10 @@ test_expect_success '7a-setup: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '7a-check: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' ' +test_expect_success '7a: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' ' + test_setup_7a && ( cd 7a && @@ -1623,7 +1644,7 @@ test_expect_success '7a-check: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1}, w/d_2 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(rename/rename(2to1): x/d_1, w/d_2 -> y_d) -test_expect_success '7b-setup: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' ' +test_setup_7b () { test_create_repo 7b && ( cd 7b && @@ -1655,9 +1676,10 @@ test_expect_success '7b-setup: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive r test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '7b-check: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' ' +test_expect_success '7b: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' ' + test_setup_7b && ( cd 7b && @@ -1702,7 +1724,7 @@ test_expect_success '7b-check: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive r # neither CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. z/d) # nor CONFLiCT x/d -> w/d vs. y/d vs. z/d) -test_expect_success '7c-setup: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' ' +test_setup_7c () { test_create_repo 7c && ( cd 7c && @@ -1732,9 +1754,10 @@ test_expect_success '7c-setup: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '7c-check: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' ' +test_expect_success '7c: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' ' + test_setup_7c && ( cd 7c && @@ -1766,7 +1789,7 @@ test_expect_success '7c-check: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to y/d) # NOTE: z->y so NOT CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to z/d) -test_expect_success '7d-setup: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' ' +test_setup_7d () { test_create_repo 7d && ( cd 7d && @@ -1796,9 +1819,10 @@ test_expect_success '7d-setup: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '7d-check: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' ' +test_expect_success '7d: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' ' + test_setup_7d && ( cd 7d && @@ -1851,7 +1875,7 @@ test_expect_success '7d-check: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how # see testcases 9c and 9d for further discussion of this issue and # how it's resolved. -test_expect_success '7e-setup: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' ' +test_setup_7e () { test_create_repo 7e && ( cd 7e && @@ -1886,9 +1910,10 @@ test_expect_success '7e-setup: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in th test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '7e-check: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' ' +test_expect_success '7e: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' ' + test_setup_7e && ( cd 7e && @@ -1945,7 +1970,7 @@ test_expect_success '7e-check: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in th # simple rule from section 5 prevents me from handling this as optimally as # we potentially could. -test_expect_success '8a-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' ' +test_setup_8a () { test_create_repo 8a && ( cd 8a && @@ -1977,9 +2002,10 @@ test_expect_success '8a-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '8a-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' ' +test_expect_success '8a: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' ' + test_setup_8a && ( cd 8a && @@ -2023,7 +2049,7 @@ test_expect_success '8a-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' ' # making us fall back to pre-directory-rename-detection behavior for both # e_1 and e_2. -test_expect_success '8b-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' ' +test_setup_8b () { test_create_repo 8b && ( cd 8b && @@ -2055,9 +2081,10 @@ test_expect_success '8b-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, w test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '8b-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' ' +test_expect_success '8b: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' ' + test_setup_8b && ( cd 8b && @@ -2096,7 +2123,7 @@ test_expect_success '8b-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, w # rename/rename(1to2) conflicts -- see testcase 9h. See also # notes in 8d. -test_expect_success '8c-setup: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete?' ' +test_setup_8c () { test_create_repo 8c && ( cd 8c && @@ -2127,9 +2154,10 @@ test_expect_success '8c-setup: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete?' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '8c-check: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete' ' +test_expect_success '8c: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete' ' + test_setup_8c && ( cd 8c && @@ -2175,7 +2203,7 @@ test_expect_success '8c-check: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete' ' # during merging are supposed to be about opposite sides doing things # differently. -test_expect_success '8d-setup: rename/delete...or not?' ' +test_setup_8d () { test_create_repo 8d && ( cd 8d && @@ -2204,9 +2232,10 @@ test_expect_success '8d-setup: rename/delete...or not?' ' test_tick && git commit -m "B" ) -' +} -test_expect_success '8d-check: rename/delete...or not?' ' +test_expect_success '8d: rename/delete...or not?' ' + test_setup_8d && ( cd 8d && @@ -2250,7 +2279,7 @@ test_expect_success '8d-check: rename/delete...or not?' ' # about the ramifications of doing that, I didn't know how to rule out # that opening other |