summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt10
-rw-r--r--merge-recursive.c1079
-rw-r--r--merge-recursive.h1
-rw-r--r--string-list.c9
-rw-r--r--string-list.h1
-rwxr-xr-xt/t3030-merge-recursive.sh7
-rwxr-xr-xt/t6020-merge-df.sh26
-rwxr-xr-xt/t6022-merge-rename.sh291
-rwxr-xr-xt/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh598
-rwxr-xr-xt/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh578
10 files changed, 2170 insertions, 430 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt
index 3f575bdcff..ce24eb96f5 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ member (you need this if you add things later) and you should set the
. Can sort an unsorted list using `sort_string_list`.
+. Can remove individual items of an unsorted list using
+ `unsorted_string_list_delete_item`.
+
. Finally it should free the list using `string_list_clear`.
Example:
@@ -112,6 +115,13 @@ write `string_list_insert(...)->util = ...;`.
The above two functions need to look through all items, as opposed to their
counterpart for sorted lists, which performs a binary search.
+`unsorted_string_list_delete_item`::
+
+ Remove an item from a string_list. The `string` pointer of the items
+ will be freed in case the `strdup_strings` member of the string_list
+ is set. The third parameter controls if the `util` pointer of the
+ items should be freed or not.
+
Data structures
---------------
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index 0804eb44e7..6bbc4512a9 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -66,10 +66,12 @@ static int sha_eq(const unsigned char *a, const unsigned char *b)
enum rename_type {
RENAME_NORMAL = 0,
RENAME_DELETE,
- RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_TWO
+ RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_ONE,
+ RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_TWO,
+ RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE
};
-struct rename_df_conflict_info {
+struct rename_conflict_info {
enum rename_type rename_type;
struct diff_filepair *pair1;
struct diff_filepair *pair2;
@@ -77,6 +79,8 @@ struct rename_df_conflict_info {
const char *branch2;
struct stage_data *dst_entry1;
struct stage_data *dst_entry2;
+ struct diff_filespec ren1_other;
+ struct diff_filespec ren2_other;
};
/*
@@ -88,34 +92,54 @@ struct stage_data {
unsigned mode;
unsigned char sha[20];
} stages[4];
- struct rename_df_conflict_info *rename_df_conflict_info;
+ struct rename_conflict_info *rename_conflict_info;
unsigned processed:1;
};
-static inline void setup_rename_df_conflict_info(enum rename_type rename_type,
- struct diff_filepair *pair1,
- struct diff_filepair *pair2,
- const char *branch1,
- const char *branch2,
- struct stage_data *dst_entry1,
- struct stage_data *dst_entry2)
+static inline void setup_rename_conflict_info(enum rename_type rename_type,
+ struct diff_filepair *pair1,
+ struct diff_filepair *pair2,
+ const char *branch1,
+ const char *branch2,
+ struct stage_data *dst_entry1,
+ struct stage_data *dst_entry2,
+ struct merge_options *o,
+ struct stage_data *src_entry1,
+ struct stage_data *src_entry2)
{
- struct rename_df_conflict_info *ci = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct rename_df_conflict_info));
+ struct rename_conflict_info *ci = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct rename_conflict_info));
ci->rename_type = rename_type;
ci->pair1 = pair1;
ci->branch1 = branch1;
ci->branch2 = branch2;
ci->dst_entry1 = dst_entry1;
- dst_entry1->rename_df_conflict_info = ci;
+ dst_entry1->rename_conflict_info = ci;
dst_entry1->processed = 0;
assert(!pair2 == !dst_entry2);
if (dst_entry2) {
ci->dst_entry2 = dst_entry2;
ci->pair2 = pair2;
- dst_entry2->rename_df_conflict_info = ci;
- dst_entry2->processed = 0;
+ dst_entry2->rename_conflict_info = ci;
+ }
+
+ if (rename_type == RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE) {
+ /*
+ * For each rename, there could have been
+ * modifications on the side of history where that
+ * file was not renamed.
+ */
+ int ostage1 = o->branch1 == branch1 ? 3 : 2;
+ int ostage2 = ostage1 ^ 1;
+
+ ci->ren1_other.path = pair1->one->path;
+ hashcpy(ci->ren1_other.sha1, src_entry1->stages[ostage1].sha);
+ ci->ren1_other.mode = src_entry1->stages[ostage1].mode;
+
+ ci->ren2_other.path = pair2->one->path;
+ hashcpy(ci->ren2_other.sha1, src_entry2->stages[ostage2].sha);
+ ci->ren2_other.mode = src_entry2->stages[ostage2].mode;
}
}
@@ -230,7 +254,7 @@ struct tree *write_tree_from_memory(struct merge_options *o)
for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
if (ce_stage(ce))
- fprintf(stderr, "BUG: %d %.*s", ce_stage(ce),
+ fprintf(stderr, "BUG: %d %.*s\n", ce_stage(ce),
(int)ce_namelen(ce), ce->name);
}
die("Bug in merge-recursive.c");
@@ -333,44 +357,90 @@ static struct string_list *get_unmerged(void)
return unmerged;
}
-static void make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts(struct merge_options *o,
- struct string_list *entries)
+static int string_list_df_name_compare(const void *a, const void *b)
{
- /* If there are D/F conflicts, and the paths currently exist
- * in the working copy as a file, we want to remove them to
- * make room for the corresponding directory. Such paths will
- * later be processed in process_df_entry() at the end. If
- * the corresponding directory ends up being removed by the
- * merge, then the file will be reinstated at that time;
- * otherwise, if the file is not supposed to be removed by the
- * merge, the contents of the file will be placed in another
- * unique filename.
+ const struct string_list_item *one = a;
+ const struct string_list_item *two = b;
+ int onelen = strlen(one->string);
+ int twolen = strlen(two->string);
+ /*
+ * Here we only care that entries for D/F conflicts are
+ * adjacent, in particular with the file of the D/F conflict
+ * appearing before files below the corresponding directory.
+ * The order of the rest of the list is irrelevant for us.
*
- * NOTE: This function relies on the fact that entries for a
- * D/F conflict will appear adjacent in the index, with the
- * entries for the file appearing before entries for paths
- * below the corresponding directory.
+ * To achieve this, we sort with df_name_compare and provide
+ * the mode S_IFDIR so that D/F conflicts will sort correctly.
+ * We use the mode S_IFDIR for everything else for simplicity,
+ * since in other cases any changes in their order due to
+ * sorting cause no problems for us.
+ */
+ int cmp = df_name_compare(one->string, onelen, S_IFDIR,
+ two->string, twolen, S_IFDIR);
+ /*
+ * Now that 'foo' and 'foo/bar' compare equal, we have to make sure
+ * that 'foo' comes before 'foo/bar'.
*/
+ if (cmp)
+ return cmp;
+ return onelen - twolen;
+}
+
+static void record_df_conflict_files(struct merge_options *o,
+ struct string_list *entries)
+{
+ /* If there is a D/F conflict and the file for such a conflict
+ * currently exist in the working copy, we want to allow it to be
+ * removed to make room for the corresponding directory if needed.
+ * The files underneath the directories of such D/F conflicts will
+ * be processed before the corresponding file involved in the D/F
+ * conflict. If the D/F directory ends up being removed by the
+ * merge, then we won't have to touch the D/F file. If the D/F
+ * directory needs to be written to the working copy, then the D/F
+ * file will simply be removed (in make_room_for_path()) to make
+ * room for the necessary paths. Note that if both the directory
+ * and the file need to be present, then the D/F file will be
+ * reinstated with a new unique name at the time it is processed.
+ */
+ struct string_list df_sorted_entries;
const char *last_file = NULL;
int last_len = 0;
int i;
+ /*
+ * If we're merging merge-bases, we don't want to bother with
+ * any working directory changes.
+ */
+ if (o->call_depth)
+ return;
+
+ /* Ensure D/F conflicts are adjacent in the entries list. */
+ memset(&df_sorted_entries, 0, sizeof(struct string_list));
for (i = 0; i < entries->nr; i++) {
- const char *path = entries->items[i].string;
+ struct string_list_item *next = &entries->items[i];
+ string_list_append(&df_sorted_entries, next->string)->util =
+ next->util;
+ }
+ qsort(df_sorted_entries.items, entries->nr, sizeof(*entries->items),
+ string_list_df_name_compare);
+
+ string_list_clear(&o->df_conflict_file_set, 1);
+ for (i = 0; i < df_sorted_entries.nr; i++) {
+ const char *path = df_sorted_entries.items[i].string;
int len = strlen(path);
- struct stage_data *e = entries->items[i].util;
+ struct stage_data *e = df_sorted_entries.items[i].util;
/*
* Check if last_file & path correspond to a D/F conflict;
* i.e. whether path is last_file+'/'+<something>.
- * If so, remove last_file to make room for path and friends.
+ * If so, record that it's okay to remove last_file to make
+ * room for path and friends if needed.
*/
if (last_file &&
len > last_len &&
memcmp(path, last_file, last_len) == 0 &&
path[last_len] == '/') {
- output(o, 3, "Removing %s to make room for subdirectory; may re-add later.", last_file);
- unlink(last_file);
+ string_list_insert(&o->df_conflict_file_set, last_file);
}
/*
@@ -386,6 +456,7 @@ static void make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts(struct merge_options *o,
last_file = NULL;
}
}
+ string_list_clear(&df_sorted_entries, 0);
}
struct rename {
@@ -461,10 +532,21 @@ static struct string_list *get_renames(struct merge_options *o,
return renames;
}
-static int update_stages_options(const char *path, struct diff_filespec *o,
- struct diff_filespec *a, struct diff_filespec *b,
- int clear, int options)
+static int update_stages(const char *path, const struct diff_filespec *o,
+ const struct diff_filespec *a,
+ const struct diff_filespec *b)
{
+
+ /*
+ * NOTE: It is usually a bad idea to call update_stages on a path
+ * before calling update_file on that same path, since it can
+ * sometimes lead to spurious "refusing to lose untracked file..."
+ * messages from update_file (via make_room_for path via
+ * would_lose_untracked). Instead, reverse the order of the calls
+ * (executing update_file first and then update_stages).
+ */
+ int clear = 1;
+ int options = ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD | ADD_CACHE_SKIP_DFCHECK;
if (clear)
if (remove_file_from_cache(path))
return -1;
@@ -480,23 +562,11 @@ static int update_stages_options(const char *path, struct diff_filespec *o,
return 0;
}
-static int update_stages(const char *path, struct diff_filespec *o,
- struct diff_filespec *a, struct diff_filespec *b,
- int clear)
+static void update_entry(struct stage_data *entry,
+ struct diff_filespec *o,
+ struct diff_filespec *a,
+ struct diff_filespec *b)
{
- int options = ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD | ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_REPLACE;
- return update_stages_options(path, o, a, b, clear, options);
-}
-
-static int update_stages_and_entry(const char *path,
- struct stage_data *entry,
- struct diff_filespec *o,
- struct diff_filespec *a,
- struct diff_filespec *b,
- int clear)
-{
- int options;
-
entry->processed = 0;
entry->stages[1].mode = o->mode;
entry->stages[2].mode = a->mode;
@@ -504,8 +574,6 @@ static int update_stages_and_entry(const char *path,
hashcpy(entry->stages[1].sha, o->sha1);
hashcpy(entry->stages[2].sha, a->sha1);
hashcpy(entry->stages[3].sha, b->sha1);
- options = ADD_CACHE_OK_TO_ADD | ADD_CACHE_SKIP_DFCHECK;
- return update_stages_options(path, o, a, b, clear, options);
}
static int remove_file(struct merge_options *o, int clean,
@@ -563,7 +631,31 @@ static void flush_buffer(int fd, const char *buf, unsigned long size)
}
}
-static int would_lose_untracked(const char *path)
+static int dir_in_way(const char *path, int check_working_copy)
+{
+ int pos, pathlen = strlen(path);
+ char *dirpath = xmalloc(pathlen + 2);
+ struct stat st;
+
+ strcpy(dirpath, path);
+ dirpath[pathlen] = '/';
+ dirpath[pathlen+1] = '\0';
+
+ pos = cache_name_pos(dirpath, pathlen+1);
+
+ if (pos < 0)
+ pos = -1 - pos;
+ if (pos < active_nr &&
+ !strncmp(dirpath, active_cache[pos]->name, pathlen+1)) {
+ free(dirpath);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ free(dirpath);
+ return check_working_copy && !lstat(path, &st) && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode);
+}
+
+static int was_tracked(const char *path)
{
int pos = cache_name_pos(path, strlen(path));
@@ -580,18 +672,42 @@ static int would_lose_untracked(const char *path)
switch (ce_stage(active_cache[pos])) {
case 0:
case 2:
- return 0;
+ return 1;
}
pos++;
}
- return file_exists(path);
+ return 0;
}
-static int make_room_for_path(const char *path)
+static int would_lose_untracked(const char *path)
{
- int status;
+ return !was_tracked(path) && file_exists(path);
+}
+
+static int make_room_for_path(struct merge_options *o, const char *path)
+{
+ int status, i;
const char *msg = "failed to create path '%s'%s";
+ /* Unlink any D/F conflict files that are in the way */
+ for (i = 0; i < o->df_conflict_file_set.nr; i++) {
+ const char *df_path = o->df_conflict_file_set.items[i].string;
+ size_t pathlen = strlen(path);
+ size_t df_pathlen = strlen(df_path);
+ if (df_pathlen < pathlen &&
+ path[df_pathlen] == '/' &&
+ strncmp(path, df_path, df_pathlen) == 0) {
+ output(o, 3,
+ "Removing %s to make room for subdirectory\n",
+ df_path);
+ unlink(df_path);
+ unsorted_string_list_delete_item(&o->df_conflict_file_set,
+ i, 0);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Make sure leading directories are created */
status = safe_create_leading_directories_const(path);
if (status) {
if (status == -3) {
@@ -659,7 +775,7 @@ static void update_file_flags(struct merge_options *o,
}
}
- if (make_room_for_path(path) < 0) {
+ if (make_room_for_path(o, path) < 0) {
update_wd = 0;
free(buf);
goto update_index;
@@ -712,9 +828,9 @@ struct merge_file_info {
static int merge_3way(struct merge_options *o,
mmbuffer_t *result_buf,
- struct diff_filespec *one,
- struct diff_filespec *a,
- struct diff_filespec *b,
+ const struct diff_filespec *one,
+ const struct diff_filespec *a,
+ const struct diff_filespec *b,
const char *branch1,
const char *branch2)
{
@@ -771,12 +887,12 @@ static int merge_3way(struct merge_options *o,
return merge_status;
}
-static struct merge_file_info merge_file(struct merge_options *o,
- struct diff_filespec *one,
- struct diff_filespec *a,
- struct diff_filespec *b,
- const char *branch1,
- const char *branch2)
+static struct merge_file_info merge_file_1(struct merge_options *o,
+ const struct diff_filespec *one,
+ const struct diff_filespec *a,
+ const struct diff_filespec *b,
+ const char *branch1,
+ const char *branch2)
{
struct merge_file_info result;
result.merge = 0;
@@ -845,94 +961,303 @@ static struct merge_file_info merge_file(struct merge_options *o,
return result;
}
+static struct merge_file_info
+merge_file_special_markers(struct merge_options *o,
+ const struct diff_filespec *one,
+ const struct diff_filespec *a,
+ const struct diff_filespec *b,
+ const char *branch1,
+ const char *filename1,
+ const char *branch2,
+ const char *filename2)
+{
+ char *side1 = NULL;
+ char *side2 = NULL;
+ struct merge_file_info mfi;
+
+ if (filename1) {
+ side1 = xmalloc(strlen(branch1) + strlen(filename1) + 2);
+ sprintf(side1, "%s:%s", branch1, filename1);
+ }
+ if (filename2) {
+ side2 = xmalloc(strlen(branch2) + strlen(filename2) + 2);
+ sprintf(side2, "%s:%s", branch2, filename2);
+ }
+
+ mfi = merge_file_1(o, one, a, b,
+ side1 ? side1 : branch1, side2 ? side2 : branch2);
+ free(side1);
+ free(side2);
+ return mfi;
+}
+
+static struct merge_file_info merge_file(struct merge_options *o,
+ const char *path,
+ const unsigned char *o_sha, int o_mode,
+ const unsigned char *a_sha, int a_mode,
+ const unsigned char *b_sha, int b_mode,
+ const char *branch1,
+ const char *branch2)
+{
+ struct diff_filespec one, a, b;
+
+ one.path = a.path = b.path = (char *)path;
+ hashcpy(one.sha1, o_sha);
+ one.mode = o_mode;
+ hashcpy(a.sha1, a_sha);
+ a.mode = a_mode;
+ hashcpy(b.sha1, b_sha);
+ b.mode = b_mode;
+ return merge_file_1(o, &one, &a, &b, branch1, branch2);
+}
+
+static void handle_change_delete(struct merge_options *o,
+ const char *path,
+ const unsigned char *o_sha, int o_mode,
+ const unsigned char *a_sha, int a_mode,
+ const unsigned char *b_sha, int b_mode,
+ const char *change, const char *change_past)
+{
+ char *renamed = NULL;
+ if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth)) {
+ renamed = unique_path(o, path, a_sha ? o->branch1 : o->branch2);
+ }
+
+ if (o->call_depth) {
+ /*
+ * We cannot arbitrarily accept either a_sha or b_sha as
+ * correct; since there is no true "middle point" between
+ * them, simply reuse the base version for virtual merge base.
+ */
+ remove_file_from_cache(path);
+ update_file(o, 0, o_sha, o_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
+ } else if (!a_sha) {
+ output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in %s "
+ "and %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
+ change, path, o->branch1,
+ change_past, o->branch2, o->branch2, path,
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
+ update_file(o, 0, b_sha, b_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
+ } else {
+ output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (%s/delete): %s deleted in %s "
+ "and %s in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
+ change, path, o->branch2,
+ change_past, o->branch1, o->branch1, path,
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
+ NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
+ if (renamed)
+ update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, renamed);
+ /*
+ * No need to call update_file() on path when !renamed, since
+ * that would needlessly touch path. We could call
+ * update_file_flags() with update_cache=0 and update_wd=0,
+ * but that's a no-op.
+ */
+ }
+ free(renamed);
+}
+
static void conflict_rename_delete(struct merge_options *o,
struct diff_filepair *pair,
const char *rename_branch,
const char *other_branch)
{
- char *dest_name = pair->two->path;
- int df_conflict = 0;
- struct stat st;
+ const struct diff_filespec *orig = pair->one;
+ const struct diff_filespec *dest = pair->two;
+ const unsigned char *a_sha = NULL;
+ const unsigned char *b_sha = NULL;
+ int a_mode = 0;
+ int b_mode = 0;
+
+ if (rename_branch == o->branch1) {
+ a_sha = dest->sha1;
+ a_mode = dest->mode;
+ } else {
+ b_sha = dest->sha1;
+ b_mode = dest->mode;
+ }
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename %s->%s in %s "
- "and deleted in %s",
- pair->one->path, pair->two->path, rename_branch,
- other_branch);
- if (!o->call_depth)
- update_stages(dest_name, NULL,
- rename_branch == o->branch1 ? pair->two : NULL,
- rename_branch == o->branch1 ? NULL : pair->two,
- 1);
- if (lstat(dest_name, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
- dest_name = unique_path(o, dest_name, rename_branch);
- df_conflict = 1;
+ handle_change_delete(o,
+ o->call_depth ? orig->path : dest->path,
+ orig->sha1, orig->mode,
+ a_sha, a_mode,
+ b_sha, b_mode,
+ "rename", "renamed");
+
+ if (o->call_depth) {
+ remove_file_from_cache(dest->path);
+ } else {
+ update_stages(dest->path, NULL,
+ rename_branch == o->branch1 ? dest : NULL,
+ rename_branch == o->branch1 ? NULL : dest);
}
- update_file(o, 0, pair->two->sha1, pair->two->mode, dest_name);
- if (df_conflict)
- free(dest_name);
+
}
-static void conflict_rename_rename_1to2(struct merge_options *o,
- struct diff_filepair *pair1,
- const char *branch1,
- struct diff_filepair *pair2,
- const char *branch2)
+static struct diff_filespec *filespec_from_entry(struct diff_filespec *target,
+ struct stage_data *entry,
+ int stage)
{
- /* One file was renamed in both branches, but to different names. */
- char *del[2];
- int delp = 0;
- const char *ren1_dst = pair1->two->path;
- const char *ren2_dst = pair2->two->path;
- const char *dst_name1 = ren1_dst;
- const char *dst_name2 = ren2_dst;
- struct stat st;
- if (lstat(ren1_dst, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
- dst_name1 = del[delp++] = unique_path(o, ren1_dst, branch1);
- output(o, 1, "%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead",
- ren1_dst, branch2, dst_name1);
+ unsigned char *sha = entry->stages[stage].sha;
+ unsigned mode = entry->stages[stage].mode;
+ if (mode == 0 || is_null_sha1(sha))
+ return NULL;
+ hashcpy(target->sha1, sha);
+ target->mode = mode;
+ return target;
+}
+
+static void handle_file(struct merge_options *o,
+ struct diff_filespec *rename,
+ int stage,
+ struct rename_conflict_info *ci)
+{
+ char *dst_name = rename->path;
+ struct stage_data *dst_entry;
+ const char *cur_branch, *other_branch;
+ struct diff_filespec other;
+ struct diff_filespec *add;
+
+ if (stage == 2) {
+ dst_entry = ci->dst_entry1;
+ cur_branch = ci->branch1;
+ other_branch = ci->branch2;
+ } else {
+ dst_entry = ci->dst_entry2;
+ cur_branch = ci->branch2;
+ other_branch = ci->branch1;
}
- if (lstat(ren2_dst, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
- dst_name2 = del[delp++] = unique_path(o, ren2_dst, branch2);
- output(o, 1, "%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead",
- ren2_dst, branch1, dst_name2);
+
+ add = filespec_from_entry(&other, dst_entry, stage ^ 1);
+ if (add) {
+ char *add_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, other_branch);
+ update_file(o, 0, add->sha1, add->mode, add_name);
+
+ remove_file(o, 0, rename->path, 0);
+ dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch);
+ } else {
+ if (dir_in_way(rename->path, !o->call_depth)) {
+ dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch);
+ output(o, 1, "%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead",
+ rename->path, other_branch, dst_name);
+ }
}
+ update_file(o, 0, rename->sha1, rename->mode, dst_name);
+ if (stage == 2)
+ update_stages(rename->path, NULL, rename, add);
+ else
+ update_stages(rename->path, NULL, add, rename);
+
+ if (dst_name != rename->path)
+ free(dst_name);
+}
+
+static void conflict_rename_rename_1to2(struct merge_options *o,
+ struct rename_conflict_info *ci)
+{
+ /* One file was renamed in both branches, but to different names. */
+ struct diff_filespec *one = ci->pair1->one;
+ struct diff_filespec *a = ci->pair1->two;
+ struct diff_filespec *b = ci->pair2->two;
+
+ output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): "
+ "Rename \"%s\"->\"%s\" in branch \"%s\" "
+ "rename \"%s\"->\"%s\" in \"%s\"%s",
+ one->path, a->path, ci->branch1,
+ one->path, b->path, ci->branch2,
+ o->call_depth ? " (left unresolved)" : "");
if (o->call_depth) {
- remove_file_from_cache(dst_name1);
- remove_file_from_cache(dst_name2);
+ struct merge_file_info mfi;
+ struct diff_filespec other;
+ struct diff_filespec *add;
+ mfi = merge_file(o, one->path,
+ one->sha1, one->mode,
+ a->sha1, a->mode,
+ b->sha1, b->mode,
+ ci->branch1, ci->branch2);
/*
- * Uncomment to leave the conflicting names in the resulting tree
- *
- * update_file(o, 0, pair1->two->sha1, pair1->two->mode, dst_name1);
- * update_file(o, 0, pair2->two->sha1, pair2->two->mode, dst_name2);
+ * FIXME: For rename/add-source conflicts (if we could detect
+ * such), this is wrong. We should instead find a unique
+ * pathname and then either rename the add-source file to that
+ * unique path, or use that unique path instead of src here.
*/
- } else {
- update_stages(ren1_dst, NULL, pair1->two, NULL, 1);
- update_stages(ren2_dst, NULL, NULL, pair2->two, 1);
+ update_file(o, 0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, one->path);
- update_file(o, 0, pair1->two->sha1, pair1->two->mode, dst_name1);
- update_file(o, 0, pair2->two->sha1, pair2->two->mode, dst_name2);
+ /*
+ * Above, we put the merged content at the merge-base's
+ * path. Now we usually need to delete both a->path and
+ * b->path. However, the rename on each side of the merge
+ * could also be involved in a rename/add conflict. In
+ * such cases, we should keep the added file around,
+ * resolving the conflict at that path in its favor.
+ */
+ add = filespec_from_entry(&other, ci->dst_entry1, 2 ^ 1);
+ if (add)
+ update_file(o, 0, add->sha1, add->mode, a->path);
+ else
+ remove_file_from_cache(a->path);
+ add = filespec_from_entry(&other, ci->dst_entry2, 3 ^ 1);
+ if (add)
+ update_file(o, 0, add->sha1, add->mode, b->path);
+ else
+ remove_file_from_cache(b->path);
+ } else {
+ handle_file(o, a, 2, ci);
+ handle_file(o, b, 3, ci);
}
- while (delp--)
- free(del[delp]);
}
static void conflict_rename_rename_2to1(struct merge_options *o,
- struct rename *ren1,
- const char *branch1,
- struct rename *ren2,
- const char *branch2)
+ struct rename_conflict_info *ci)
{
- /* Two files were renamed to the same thing. */
- char *new_path1 = unique_path(o, ren1->pair->two->path, branch1);
- char *new_path2 = unique_path(o, ren2->pair->two->path, branch2);
- output(o, 1, "Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead",
- ren1->pair->one->path, new_path1,
- ren2->pair->one->path, new_path2);
- remove_file(o, 0, ren1->pair->two->path, 0);
- update_file(o, 0, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, new_path1);
- update_file(o, 0, ren2->pair->two->sha1, ren2->pair->two->mode, new_path2);
- free(new_path2);
- free(new_path1);
+ /* Two files, a & b, were renamed to the same thing, c. */
+ struct diff_filespec *a = ci->pair1->one;
+ struct diff_filespec *b = ci->pair2->one;
+ struct diff_filespec *c1 = ci->pair1->two;
+ struct diff_filespec *c2 = ci->pair2->two;
+ char *path = c1->path; /* == c2->path */
+ struct merge_file_info mfi_c1;
+ struct merge_file_info mfi_c2;
+
+ output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): "
+ "Rename %s->%s in %s. "
+ "Rename %s->%s in %s",
+ a->path, c1->path, ci->branch1,
+ b->path, c2->path, ci->branch2);
+
+ remove_file(o, 1, a->path, would_lose_untracked(a->path));
+ remove_file(o, 1, b->path, would_lose_untracked(b->path));
+
+ mfi_c1 = merge_file_special_markers(o, a, c1, &ci->ren1_other,
+ o->branch1, c1->path,
+ o->branch2, ci->ren1_other.path);
+ mfi_c2 = merge_file_special_markers(o, b, &ci->ren2_other, c2,
+ o->branch1, ci->ren2_other.path,
+ o->branch2, c2->path);
+
+ if (o->call_depth) {
+ /*
+ * If mfi_c1.clean && mfi_c2.clean, then it might make
+ * sense to do a two-way merge of those results. But, I
+ * think in all cases, it makes sense to have the virtual
+ * merge base just undo the renames; they can be detected
+ * again later for the non-recursive merge.
+ */
+ remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
+ update_file(o, 0, mfi_c1.sha, mfi_c1.mode, a->path);
+ update_file(o, 0, mfi_c2.sha, mfi_c2.mode, b->path);
+ } else {
+ char *new_path1 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch1);
+ char *new_path2 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch2);
+ output(o, 1, "Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead",
+ a->path, new_path1, b->path, new_path2);
+ remove_file(o, 0, path, 0);
+ update_file(o, 0, mfi_c1.sha, mfi_c1.mode, new_path1);
+ update_file(o, 0, mfi_c2.sha, mfi_c2.mode, new_path2);
+ free(new_path2);
+ free(new_path1);
+ }
}
static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
@@ -947,12 +1272,12 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
for (i = 0; i < a_renames->nr; i++) {
sre = a_renames->items[i].util;
string_list_insert(&a_by_dst, sre->pair->two->path)->util
- = sre->dst_entry;
+ = (void *)sre;
}
for (i = 0; i < b_renames->nr; i++) {
sre = b_renames->items[i].util;
string_list_insert(&b_by_dst, sre->pair->two->path)->util
- = sre->dst_entry;
+ = (void *)sre;
}
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < a_renames->nr || j < b_renames->nr;) {
@@ -960,6 +1285,7 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
struct rename *ren1 = NULL, *ren2 = NULL;
const char *branch1, *branch2;
const char *ren1_src, *ren1_dst;
+ struct string_list_item *lookup;
if (i >= a_renames->nr) {
ren2 = b_renames->items[j++].util;
@@ -991,44 +1317,82 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
ren1 = tmp;
}
- ren1->dst_entry->processed = 1;
- ren1->src_entry->processed = 1;
-
if (ren1->processed)
continue;
ren1->processed = 1;
+ ren1->dst_entry->processed = 1;
+ /* BUG: We should only mark src_entry as processed if we
+ * are not dealing with a rename + add-source case.
+ */
+ ren1->src_entry->processed = 1;
ren1_src = ren1->pair->one->path;
ren1_dst = ren1->pair->two->path;
if (ren2) {
+ /* One file renamed on both sides */
const char *ren2_src = ren2->pair->one->path;
const char *ren2_dst = ren2->pair->two->path;
- /* Renamed in 1 and renamed in 2 */
+ enum rename_type rename_type;
if (strcmp(ren1_src, ren2_src) != 0)
- die("ren1.src != ren2.src");
+ die("ren1_src != ren2_src");
ren2->dst_entry->processed = 1;
ren2->processed = 1;
if (strcmp(ren1_dst, ren2_dst) != 0) {
- setup_rename_df_conflict_info(RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_TWO,
- ren1->pair,
- ren2->pair,
- branch1,
- branch2,
- ren1->dst_entry,
- ren2->dst_entry);
+ rename_type = RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_TWO;
+ clean_merge = 0;
} else {
+ rename_type = RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_ONE;
+ /* BUG: We should only remove ren1_src in
+ * the base stage (think of rename +
+ * add-source cases).
+ */
remove_file(o, 1, ren1_src, 1);
- update_stages_and_entry(ren1_dst,
- ren1->dst_entry,
- ren1->pair->one,
- ren1->pair->two,
- ren2->pair->two,
- 1 /* clear */);
+ update_entry(ren1->dst_entry,
+ ren1->pair->one,
+ ren1->pair->two,
+ ren2->pair->two);
}
+ setup_rename_conflict_info(rename_type,
+ ren1->pair,
+ ren2->pair,
+ branch1,
+ branch2,
+ ren1->dst_entry,
+ ren2->dst_entry,
+ o,
+ NULL,
+ NULL);
+ } else if ((lookup = string_list_lookup(renames2Dst, ren1_dst))) {
+ /* Two different files renamed to the same thing */
+ char *ren2_dst;
+ ren2 = lookup->util;
+ ren2_dst = ren2->pair->two->path;
+ if (strcmp(ren1_dst, ren2_dst) != 0)
+ die("ren1_dst != ren2_dst");
+
+ clean_merge = 0;
+ ren2->processed = 1;
+ /*
+ * BUG: We should only mark src_entry as processed
+ * if we are not dealing with a rename + add-source
+ * case.
+ */
+ ren2->src_entry->processed = 1;
+
+ setup_rename_conflict_info(RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE,
+ ren1->pair,
+ ren2->pair,
+ branch1,
+ branch2,
+ ren1->dst_entry,
+ ren2->dst_entry,
+ o,
+ ren1->src_entry,
+ ren2->src_entry);
+
} else {
/* Renamed in 1, maybe changed in 2 */
- struct string_list_item *item;
/* we only use sha1 and mode of these */
struct diff_filespec src_other, dst_other;
int try_merge;
@@ -1042,7 +1406,12 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
int renamed_stage = a_renames == renames1 ? 2 : 3;
int other_stage = a_renames == renames1 ? 3 : 2;
- remove_file(o, 1, ren1_src, o->call_depth || renamed_stage == 2);
+ /* BUG: We should only remove ren1_src in the base
+ * stage and in other_stage (think of rename +
+ * add-source case).
+ */
+ remove_file(o, 1, ren1_src,
+ renamed_stage == 2 || !was_tracked(ren1_src));
hashcpy(src_other.sha1, ren1->src_entry->stages[other_stage].sha);
src_other.mode = ren1->src_entry->stages[other_stage].mode;
@@ -1051,27 +1420,33 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
try_merge = 0;
if (sha_eq(src_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
- if (string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
- ren1->dst_entry->processed = 0;
- setup_rename_df_conflict_info(RENAME_DELETE,
- ren1->pair,
- NULL,
- branch1,
- branch2,
- ren1->dst_entry,
- NULL);
- } else {
- clean_merge = 0;
- conflict_rename_delete(o, ren1->pair, branch1, branch2);
- }
+ setup_rename_conflict_info(RENAME_DELETE,
+ ren1->pair,
+ NULL,
+ branch1,
+ branch2,
+ ren1->dst_entry,
+ NULL,
+ o,
+ NULL,
+ NULL);
} else if ((dst_other.mode == ren1->pair->two->mode) &&
sha_eq(dst_other.sha1, ren1->pair->two->sha1)) {
- /* Added file on the other side
- identical to the file being
- renamed: clean merge */
- update_file(o, 1, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, ren1_dst);
+ /*
+ * Added file on the other side identical to
+ * the file being renamed: clean merge.
+ * Also, there is no need to overwrite the
+ * file already in the working copy, so call
+ * update_file_flags() instead of
+ * update_file().
+ */
+ update_file_flags(o,
+ ren1->pair->two->sha1,
+ ren1->pair->two->mode,
+ ren1_dst,
+ 1, /* update_cache */
+ 0 /* update_wd */);
} else if (!sha_eq(dst_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
- const char *new_path;
clean_merge = 0;
try_merge = 1;
output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/add): Rename %s->%s in %s. "
@@ -1080,40 +1455,19 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
ren1_dst, branch2);
if (o->call_depth) {
struct merge_file_info mfi;
- struct diff_filespec one, a, b;
-
- one.path = a.path = b.path =
- (char *)ren1_dst;
- hashcpy(one.sha1, null_sha1);
- one.mode = 0;
- hashcpy(a.sha1, ren1->pair->two->sha1);
- a.mode = ren1->pair->two->mode;
- hashcpy(b.sha1, dst_other.sha1);
- b.mode = dst_other.mode;
- mfi = merge_file(o, &one, &a, &b,
- branch1,
- branch2);
+ mfi = merge_file(o, ren1_dst, null_sha1, 0,
+ ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode,
+ dst_other.sha1, dst_other.mode,
+ branch1, branch2);
output(o, 1, "Adding merged %s", ren1_dst);
- update_file(o, 0,
- mfi.sha,
- mfi.mode,
- ren1_dst);
+ update_file(o, 0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, ren1_dst);
try_merge = 0;
} else {
- new_path = unique_path(o, ren1_dst, branch2);
+ char *new_path = unique_path(o, ren1_dst, branch2);
output(o, 1, "Adding as %s instead", new_path);
update_file(o, 0, dst_other.sha1, dst_other.mode, new_path);
+ free(new_path);
}
- } else if ((item = string_list_lookup(renames2Dst, ren1_dst))) {
- ren2 = item->util;
- clean_merge = 0;
- ren2->processed = 1;
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): "
- "Rename %s->%s in %s. "
- "Rename %s->%s in %s",
- ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
- ren2->pair->one->path, ren2->pair->two->path, branch2);
- conflict_rename_rename_2to1(o, ren1, branch1, ren2, branch2);
} else
try_merge = 1;
@@ -1129,16 +1483,17 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
b = ren1->pair->two;
a = &src_other;
}
- update_stages_and_entry(ren1_dst, ren1->dst_entry, one, a, b, 1);
- if (string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)) {
- setup_rename_df_conflict_info(RENAME_NORMAL,
- ren1->pair,
- NULL,
- branch1,
- NULL,
- ren1->dst_entry,
- NULL);
- }
+ update_entry(ren1->dst_entry, one, a, b);
+ setup_rename_conflict_info(RENAME_NORMAL,
+ ren1->pair,
+ NULL,
+ branch1,
+ NULL,
+ ren1->dst_entry,
+ NULL,
+ o,
+ NULL,
+ NULL);
}
}
}
@@ -1200,29 +1555,18 @@ error_return:
return ret;
}
-static void handle_delete_modify(struct merge_options *o,
+static void handle_modify_delete(struct merge_options *o,
const char *path,
- const char *new_path,
+ unsigned char *o_sha, int o_mode,
unsigned char *a_sha, int a_mode,
unsigned char *b_sha, int b_mode)
{
- if (!a_sha) {
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
- "and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
- path, o->branch1,
- o->branch2, o->branch2, path,
- path == new_path ? "" : " at ",
- path == new_path ? "" : new_path);
- update_file(o, 0, b_sha, b_mode, new_path);
- } else {
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (delete/modify): %s deleted in %s "
- "and modified in %s. Version %s of %s left in tree%s%s.",
- path, o->branch2,
- o->branch1, o->branch1, path,
- path == new_path ? "" : " at ",
- path == new_path ? "" : new_path);
- update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, new_path);
- }
+ handle_change_delete(o,
+ path,
+ o_sha, o_mode,
+ a_sha, a_mode,
+ b_sha, b_mode,
+ "modify", "modified");
}
static int merge_content(struct merge_options *o,
@@ -1230,12 +1574,12 @@ static int merge_content(struct merge_options *o,
unsigned char *o_sha, int o_mode,
unsigned char *a_sha, int a_mode,
unsigned char *b_sha, int b_mode,
- const char *df_rename_conflict_branch)
+ struct rename_conflict_info *rename_conflict_info)
{
const char *reason = "content";
+ const char *path1 = NULL, *path2 = NULL;
struct merge_file_info mfi;
struct diff_filespec one, a, b;
- struct stat st;
unsigned df_conflict_remains = 0;
if (!o_sha) {
@@ -1250,16 +1594,43 @@ static int merge_content(struct merge_options *o,
hashcpy(b.sha1, b_sha);
b.mode = b_mode;
- mfi = merge_file(o, &one, &a, &b, o->branch1, o->branch2);
- if (df_rename_conflict_branch &&
- lstat(path, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
- df_conflict_remains = 1;
+ if (rename_conflict_info) {
+ struct diff_filepair *pair1 = rename_conflict_info->pair1;
+
+ path1 = (o->branch1 == rename_conflict_info->branch1) ?
+ pair1->two->path : pair1->one->path;
+ /* If rename_conflict_info->pair2 != NULL, we are in
+ * RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_ONE case. Otherwise, we have a
+ * normal rename.
+ */
+ path2 = (rename_conflict_info->pair2 ||
+ o->branch2 == rename_conflict_info->branch1) ?
+ pair1->two->path : pair1->one->path;
+
+ if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth))
+ df_conflict_remains = 1;
}
+ mfi = merge_file_special_markers(o, &one, &a, &b,
+ o->branch1, path1,
+ o->branch2, path2);
if (mfi.clean && !df_conflict_remains &&
- sha_eq(mfi.sha, a_sha) && mfi.mode == a.mode)
+ sha_eq(mfi.sha, a_sha) && mfi.mode == a_mode) {
+ int path_renamed_outside_HEAD;
output(o, 3, "Skipped %s (merged same as existing)", path);
- else
+ /*
+ * The content merge resulted in the same file contents we
+ * already had. We can return early if those file contents
+ * are recorded at the correct path (which may not be true
+ * if the merge involves a rename).
+ */
+ path_renamed_outside_HEAD = !path2 || !strcmp(path, path2);
+ if (!path_renamed_outside_HEAD) {
+ add_cacheinfo(mfi.mode, mfi.sha, path,
+ 0 /*stage*/, 1 /*refresh*/, 0 /*options*/);
+ return mfi.clean;
+ }
+ } else
output(o, 2, "Auto-merging %s", path);
if (!mfi.clean) {
@@ -1267,16 +1638,34 @@ static int merge_content(struct merge_options *o,
reason = "submodule";
output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (%s): Merge conflict in %s",
reason, path);
+ if (rename_conflict_info && !df_conflict_remains)
+ update_stages(path, &one, &a, &b);
}
if (df_conflict_remains) {
- const char *new_path;
- update_file_flags(o, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path,
- o->call_depth || mfi.clean, 0);
- new_path = unique_path(o, path, df_rename_conflict_branch);
- mfi.clean = 0;
+ char *new_path;
+ if (o->call_depth) {
+ remove_file_from_cache(path);
+ } else {
+ if (!mfi.clean)
+ update_stages(path, &one, &a, &b);
+ else {
+ int file_from_stage2 = was_tracked(path);
+ struct diff_filespec merged;
+ hashcpy(merged.sha1, mfi.sha);
+ merged.mode = mfi.mode;
+
+ update_stages(path, NULL,
+ file_from_stage2 ? &merged : NULL,
+ file_from_stage2 ? NULL : &merged);
+ }
+
+ }
+ new_path = unique_path(o, path, rename_conflict_info->branch1);
output(o, 1, "Adding as %s instead", new_path);
- update_file_flags(o, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, new_path, 0, 1);
+ update_file(o, 0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, new_path);
+ free(new_path);
+ mfi.clean = 0;
} else {
update_file(o, mfi.clean, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, path);
}
@@ -1301,104 +1690,15 @@ static int process_entry(struct merge_options *o,
unsigned char *a_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[2].sha, a_mode);
unsigned char *b_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[3].sha, b_mode);
- if (entry->rename_df_conflict_info)
- return 1; /* Such cases are handled elsewhere. */
-
- entry->processed = 1;
- if (o_sha && (!a_sha || !b_sha)) {
- /* Case A: Deleted in one */
- if ((!a_sha && !b_sha) ||
- (!b_sha && blob_unchanged(o_sha, a_sha, normalize, path)) ||
- (!a_sha && blob_unchanged(o_sha, b_sha, normalize, path))) {
- /* Deleted in both or deleted in one and
- * unchanged in the other */
- if (a_sha)
- output(o, 2, "Removing %s", path);
- /* do not touch working file if it did not exist */
- remove_file(o, 1, path, !a_sha);
- } else if (string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set,
- path)) {
- entry->processed = 0;
- return 1; /* Assume clean until processed */
- } else {
- /* Deleted in one and changed in the other */
- clean_merge = 0;
- handle_delete_modify(o, path, path,
- a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode);
- }
-
- } else if ((!o_sha && a_sha && !b_sha) ||
- (!o_sha && !a_sha && b_sha)) {
- /* Case B: Added in one. */
- unsigned mode;
- const unsigned char *sha;
-
- if (a_sha) {
- mode = a_mode;
- sha = a_sha;
- } else {
- mode = b_mode;
- sha = b_sha;
- }
- if (string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, path)) {
- /* Handle D->F conflicts after all subfiles */
- entry->processed = 0;
- return 1; /* Assume clean until processed */
- } else {
- output(o, 2, "Adding %s", path);
- update_file(o, 1, sha, mode, path);
- }
- } else if (a_sha && b_sha) {
- /* Case C: Added in both (check for same permissions) and */
- /* case D: Modified in both, but differently. */
- clean_merge = merge_content(o, path,
- o_sha, o_mode, a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode,
- NULL);
- } else if (!o_sha && !a_sha && !b_sha) {
- /*
- * this entry was deleted altogether. a_mode == 0 means
- * we had that path and want to actively remove it.
- */
- remove_file(o, 1, path, !a_mode);
- } else
- die("Fatal merge failure, shouldn't happen.");
-
- return clean_merge;
-}
-
-/*
- * Per entry merge function for D/F (and/or rename) conflicts. In the
- * cases we can cleanly resolve D/F conflicts, process_entry() can
- * clean out all the files below the directory for us. All D/F
- * conflict cases must be handled here at the end to make sure any
- * directories that can be cleaned out, are.
- *
- * Some rename conflicts may also be handled here that don't necessarily
- * involve D/F conflicts, since the code to handle them is generic enough
- * to handle those rename conflicts with or without D/F conflicts also
- * being involved.
- */
-static int process_df_entry(struct merge_options *o,
- const char *path, struct stage_data *entry)
-{
- int clean_merge = 1;
- unsigned o_mode = entry->stages[1].mode;
- unsigned a_mode = entry->stages[2].mode;
- unsigned b_mode = entry->stages[3].mode;
- unsigned char *o_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[1].sha, o_mode);
- unsigned char *a_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[2].sha, a_mode);
- unsigned char *b_sha = stage_sha(entry->stages[3].sha, b_mode);
- struct stat st;
-
entry->processed = 1;
- if (entry->rename_df_conflict_info) {
- struct rename_df_conflict_info *conflict_info = entry->rename_df_conflict_info;
- char *src;
+ if (entry->rename_conflict_info) {
+ struct rename_conflict_info *conflict_info = entry->rename_conflict_info;
switch (conflict_info->rename_type) {
case RENAME_NORMAL:
+ case RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_ONE:
clean_merge = merge_content(o, path,
o_sha, o_mode, a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode,
- conflict_info->branch1);
+ conflict_info);
break;
case RENAME_DELETE:
clean_merge = 0;
@@ -1407,39 +1707,39 @@ static int process_df_entry(struct merge_options *o,
conflict_info->branch2);
break;
case RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_TWO:
- src = conflict_info->pair1->one->path;
clean_merge = 0;
- output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (rename/rename): "
- "Rename \"%s\"->\"%s\" in branch \"%s\" "
- "rename \"%s\"->\"%s\" in \"%s\"%s",
- src, conflict_info->pair1->two->path, conflict_info->branch1,
- src, conflict_info->pair2->two->path, conflict_info->branch2,
- o->call_depth ? " (left unresolved)" : "");
- if (o->call_depth) {
- remove_file_from_cache(src);
- update_file(o, 0, conflict_info->pair1->one->sha1,
- conflict_info->pair1->one->mode, src);
- }
- conflict_rename_rename_1to2(o, conflict_info->pair1,
- conflict_info->branch1,
- conflict_info->pair2,
- conflict_info->branch2);
- conflict_info->dst_entry2->processed = 1;
+ conflict_rename_rename_1to2(o, conflict_info);
+ break;
+ case RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE:
+ clean_merge = 0;
+ conflict_rename_rename_2to1(o, conflict_info);
break;
default:
entry->processed = 0;
break;
}
} else if (o_sha && (!a_sha || !b_sha)) {
- /* Modify/delete; deleted side may have put a directory in the way */
- const char *new_path = path;
- if (lstat(path, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode))
- new_path = unique_path(o, path, a_sha ? o->branch1 : o->branch2);
- clean_merge = 0;
- handle_delete_modify(o, path, new_path,
- a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode);
- } else if (!o_sha && !!a_sha != !!b_sha) {
- /* directory -> (directory, file) */
+ /* Case A: Deleted in one */
+ if ((!a_sha && !b_sha) ||
+ (!b_sha && blob_unchanged(o_sha, a_sha, normalize, path)) ||
+ (!a_sha && blob_unchanged(o_sha, b_sha, normalize, path))) {
+ /* Deleted in both or deleted in one and
+ * unchanged in the other */
+ if (a_sha)
+ output(o, 2, "Removing %s", path);
+ /* do not touch working file if it did not exist */
+ remove_file(o, 1, path, !a_sha);
+ } else {
+ /* Modify/delete; deleted side may have put a directory in the way */
+ clean_merge = 0;
+ handle_modify_delete(o, path, o_sha, o_mode,
+ a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode);
+ }
+ } else if ((!o_sha && a_sha && !b_sha) ||
+ (!o_sha && !a_sha && b_sha)) {
+ /* Case B: Added in one. */
+ /* [nothing|directory] -> ([nothing|directory], file) */
+
const char *add_branch;
const char *other_branch;
unsigned mode;
@@ -1459,21 +1759,37 @@ static int process_df_entry(struct merge_options *o,
sha = b_sha;
conf = "directory/file";
}
- if (lstat(path, &st) == 0 && S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
- const char *new_path = unique_path(o, path, add_branch);
+ if (dir_in_way(path, !o->call_depth)) {
+ char *new_path = unique_path(o, path, add_branch);
clean_merge = 0;
output(o, 1, "CONFLICT (%s): There is a directory with name %s in %s. "
"Adding %s as %s",
conf, path, other_branch, path, new_path);
+ if (o->call_depth)
+ remove_file_from_cache(path);
update_file(o, 0, sha, mode, new_path);
+ if (o->call_depth)
+ remove_file_from_cache(path);
+ free(new_path);
} else {
output(o, 2, "Adding %s", path);
- update_file(o, 1, sha, mode, path);
+ /* do not overwrite file if already present */
+ update_file_flags(o, sha, mode, path, 1, !a_sha);
}
- } else {
- entry->processed = 0;
- return 1; /* not handled; assume clean until processed */
- }
+ } else if (a_sha && b_sha) {
+ /* Case C: Added in both (check for same permissions) and */
+ /* case D: Modified in both, but differently. */
+ clean_merge = merge_content(o, path,
+ o_sha, o_mode, a_sha, a_mode, b_sha, b_mode,
+ NULL);
+ } else if (!o_sha && !a_sha && !b_sha) {
+ /*
+ * this entry was deleted altogether. a_mode == 0 means
+ * we had that path and want to actively remove it.
+ */
+ remove_file(o, 1, path, !a_mode);
+ } else
+ die("Fatal merge failure, shouldn't happen.");
return clean_merge;
}
@@ -1517,11 +1833,11 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o,
get_files_dirs(o, merge);
entries = get_unmerged();
- make_room_for_directories_of_df_conflicts(o, entries);
+ record_df_conflict_files(o, entries);
re_head = get_renames(o, head, common, head, merge, entries);
re_merge = get_renames(o, merge, common, head, merge, entries);
clean = process_renames(o, re_head, re_merge);
- for (i = 0; i < entries->nr; i++) {
+ for (i = entries->nr-1; 0 <= i; i--) {
const char *path = entries->items[i].string;
struct stage_data *e = entries->items[i].util;
if (!e->processed
@@ -1529,13 +1845,6 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o,
clean = 0;
}
for (i = 0; i < entries->nr; i++) {
- const char *path = entries->items[i].string;
- struct stage_data *e = entries->items[i].util;
- if (!e->processed
- && !process_df_entry(o, path, e))
- clean = 0;
- }
- for (i = 0; i < entries->nr; i++) {
struct stage_data *e = entries->items[i].util;
if (!e->processed)
die("Unprocessed path??? %s",
@@ -1741,6 +2050,8 @@ void init_merge_options(struct merge_options *o)
o->current_file_set.strdup_strings = 1;
memset(&o->current_directory_set, 0, sizeof(struct string_list));
o->current_directory_set.strdup_strings = 1;
+ memset(&o->df_conflict_file_set, 0, sizeof(struct string_list));
+ o->df_conflict_file_set.strdup_strings = 1;
}
int parse_merge_opt(struct merge_options *o, const char *s)
diff --git a/merge-recursive.h b/merge-recursive.h
index 7e1e972b13..58f3435e9e 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.h
+++ b/merge-recursive.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct merge_options {
struct strbuf obuf;
struct string_list current_file_set;
struct string_list current_directory_set;
+ struct string_list df_conflict_file_set;
};
/* merge_trees() but with recursive ancestor consolidation */
diff --git a/string-list.c b/string-list.c
index 51681189e8..d9810aba42 100644
--- a/string-list.c
+++ b/string-list.c
@@ -185,3 +185,12 @@ int unsorted_string_list_has_string(struct string_list *list,
return unsorted_string_list_lookup(list, string) != NULL;
}
+void unsorted_string_list_delete_item(struct string_list *list, int i, int free_util)
+{
+ if (list->strdup_strings)
+ free(list->items[i].string);
+ if (free_util)
+ free(list->items[i].util);
+ list->items[i] = list->items[list->nr-1];
+ list->nr--;
+}
diff --git a/string-list.h b/string-list.h
index bda6983983..0684cb73bf 100644
--- a/string-list.h
+++ b/string-list.h
@@ -44,4 +44,5 @@ void sort_string_list(struct string_list *list);
int unsorted_string_list_has_string(struct string_list *list, const char *string);
struct string_list_item *unsorted_string_list_lookup(struct string_list *list,
const char *string);
+void unsorted_string_list_delete_item(struct string_list *list, int i, int free_util);
#endif /* STRING_LIST_H */
diff --git a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
index 0c02d56952..55ef1895d7 100755
--- a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
+++ b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
@@ -267,7 +267,8 @@ test_expect_success 'setup 8' '
ln -s e a &&
git add a e &&
test_tick &&
- git commit -m "rename a->e, symlink a->e"
+ git commit -m "rename a->e, symlink a->e" &&
+ oln=`printf e | git hash-object --stdin`
fi
'
@@ -630,16 +631,18 @@ test_expect_success 'merge-recursive copy vs. rename' '
if test_have_prereq SYMLINKS
then
- test_expect_success 'merge-recursive rename vs. rename/symlink' '
+ test_expect_failure 'merge-recursive rename vs. rename/symlink' '
git checkout -f rename &&
git merge rename-ln &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
+ echo "120000 blob $oln a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 blob $o0 e"
+ echo "120000 $oln 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
diff --git a/t/t6020-merge-df.sh b/t/t6020-merge-df.sh
index eec8f4e3ed..27c3d73961 100755
--- a/t/t6020-merge-df.sh
+++ b/t/t6020-merge-df.sh
@@ -59,15 +59,19 @@ test_expect_success 'setup modify/delete + directory/file conflict' '
git add letters &&
git commit -m initial &&
+ # Throw in letters.txt for sorting order fun
+ # ("letters.txt" sorts between "letters" and "letters/file")
echo i >>letters &&
- git add letters &&
+ echo "version 2" >letters.txt &&
+ git add letters letters.txt &&
git commit -m modified &&
git checkout -b delete HEAD^ &&
git rm letters &&
mkdir letters &&
>letters/file &&
- git add letters &&
+ echo "version 1" >letters.txt &&
+ git add letters letters.txt &&
git commit -m deleted
'
@@ -75,25 +79,31 @@ test_expect_success 'modify/delete + directory/file conflict' '
git checkout delete^0 &&
test_must_fail git merge modify &&
- test 3 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
- test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
- test 1 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+ test 5 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
test -f letters/file &&
+ test -f letters.txt &&
test -f letters~modify
'
test_expect_success 'modify/delete + directory/file conflict; other way' '
+ # Yes, we really need the double reset since "letters" appears as
+ # both a file and a directory.
+ git reset --hard &&
git reset --hard &&
git clean -f &&
git checkout modify^0 &&
+
test_must_fail git merge delete &&
- test 3 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
- test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
- test 1 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+ test 5 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
test -f letters/file &&
+ test -f letters.txt &&
test -f letters~HEAD
'
diff --git a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
index 1ed259d864..9d8584e957 100755
--- a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
+++ b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup for rename + d/f conflicts' '
git reset --hard &&
git checkout --orphan dir-in-way &&
git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
mkdir sub &&
mkdir dir &&
@@ -302,11 +303,11 @@ test_expect_success 'Rename+D/F conflict; renamed file merges but dir in way' '
git checkout -q renamed-file-has-no-conflicts^0 &&
test_must_fail git merge --strategy=recursive dir-in-way >output &&
- grep "CONFLICT (delete/modify): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
+ grep "CONFLICT (modify/delete): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
grep "Auto-merging dir" output &&
grep "Adding as dir~HEAD instead" output &&
- test 2 -eq "$(git ls-files -u | wc -l)" &&
+ test 3 -eq "$(git ls-files -u | wc -l)" &&
test 2 -eq "$(git ls-files -u dir/file-in-the-way | wc -l)" &&
test_must_fail git diff --quiet &&
@@ -324,11 +325,11 @@ test_expect_success 'Same as previous, but merged other way' '
test_must_fail git merge --strategy=recursive renamed-file-has-no-conflicts >output 2>errors &&
! grep "error: refusing to lose untracked file at" errors &&
- grep "CONFLICT (delete/modify): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
+ grep "CONFLICT (modify/delete): dir/file-in-the-way" output &&
grep "Auto-merging dir" output &&
grep "Adding as dir~renamed-file-has-no-conflicts instead" output &&
- test 2 -eq "$(git ls-files -u | wc -l)" &&
+ test 3 -eq "$(git ls-files -u | wc -l)" &&
test 2 -eq "$(git ls-files -u dir/file-in-the-way | wc -l)" &&
test_must_fail git diff --quiet &&
@@ -350,11 +351,11 @@ cat >expected <<\EOF &&
8
9
10
-<<<<<<< HEAD
+<<<<<<< HEAD:dir
12
=======
11
->>>>>>> dir-not-in-way
+>>>>>>> dir-not-in-way:sub/file
EOF
test_expect_success 'Rename+D/F conflict; renamed file cannot merge, dir not in way' '
@@ -404,11 +405,11 @@ cat >expected <<\EOF &&
8
9
10
-<<<<<<< HEAD
+<<<<<<< HEAD:sub/file
11
=======
12
->>>>>>> renamed-file-has-conflicts
+>>>>>>> renamed-file-has-conflicts:dir
EOF
test_expect_success 'Same as previous, but merged other way' '
@@ -609,4 +610,278 @@ test_expect_success 'check handling of differently renamed file with D/F conflic
! test -f original
'
+test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, normal rename' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git checkout --orphan avoid-unnecessary-update-1 &&
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n" >original &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -m "Common commmit" &&
+
+ git mv original rename &&
+ echo 11 >>rename &&
+ git add -u &&
+ git commit -m "Renamed and modified" &&
+
+ git checkout -b merge-branch-1 HEAD~1 &&
+ echo "random content" >random-file &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -m "Random, unrelated changes"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, normal rename' '
+ git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-1^0 &&
+ test-chmtime =1000000000 rename &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 rename >expect &&
+ git merge merge-branch-1 &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 rename >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual # "rename" should have stayed intact
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup to test avoiding unnecessary update, with D/F conflict' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git checkout --orphan avoid-unnecessary-update-2 &&
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+
+ mkdir df &&
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n" >df/file &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -m "Common commmit" &&
+
+ git mv df/file temp &&
+ rm -rf df &&
+ git mv temp df &&
+ echo 11 >>df &&
+ git add -u &&
+ git commit -m "Renamed and modified" &&
+
+ git checkout -b merge-branch-2 HEAD~1 &&
+ >unrelated-change &&
+ git add unrelated-change &&
+ git commit -m "Only unrelated changes"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, with D/F conflict' '
+ git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-2^0 &&
+ test-chmtime =1000000000 df &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 df >expect &&
+ git merge merge-branch-2 &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 df >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, dir->(file,nothing)' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ >irrelevant &&
+ mkdir df &&
+ >df/file &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -mA &&
+
+ git checkout -b side
+ git rm -rf df &&
+ git commit -mB &&
+
+ git checkout master &&
+ git rm -rf df &&
+ echo bla >df &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -m "Add a newfile"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, dir->(file,nothing)' '
+ git checkout -q master^0 &&
+ test-chmtime =1000000000 df &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 df >expect &&
+ git merge side &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 df >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, modify/delete' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ >irrelevant &&
+ >file &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -mA &&
+
+ git checkout -b side
+ git rm -f file &&
+ git commit -m "Delete file" &&
+
+ git checkout master &&
+ echo bla >file &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -m "Modify file"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, modify/delete' '
+ git checkout -q master^0 &&
+ test-chmtime =1000000000 file &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 file >expect &&
+ test_must_fail git merge side &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 file >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, rename/add-dest' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n" >file &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -mA &&
+
+ git checkout -b side
+ cp file newfile &&
+ git add -A &&
+ git commit -m "Add file copy" &&
+
+ git checkout master &&
+ git mv file newfile &&
+ git commit -m "Rename file"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, rename/add-dest' '
+ git checkout -q master^0 &&
+ test-chmtime =1000000000 newfile &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 newfile >expect &&
+ git merge side &&
+ test-chmtime -v +0 newfile >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup merge of rename + small change' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git checkout --orphan rename-plus-small-change &&
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+
+ echo ORIGINAL >file &&
+ git add file &&
+
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m Initial &&
+ git checkout -b rename_branch &&
+ git mv file renamed_file &&
+ git commit -m Rename &&
+ git checkout rename-plus-small-change &&
+ echo NEW-VERSION >file &&
+ git commit -a -m Reformat
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'merge rename + small change' '
+ git merge rename_branch &&
+
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:renamed_file) = $(git rev-parse HEAD~1:file)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup for use of extended merge markers' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n" >original_file &&
+ git add original_file &&
+ git commit -mA &&
+
+ git checkout -b rename &&
+ echo 9 >>original_file &&
+ git add original_file &&
+ git mv original_file renamed_file &&
+ git commit -mB &&
+
+ git checkout master &&
+ echo 8.5 >>original_file &&
+ git add original_file &&
+ git commit -mC
+'
+
+cat >expected <<\EOF &&
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7
+8
+<<<<<<< HEAD:renamed_file
+9
+=======
+8.5
+>>>>>>> master^0:original_file
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'merge master into rename has correct extended markers' '
+ git checkout rename^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive master^0 &&
+ test_cmp expected renamed_file
+'
+
+cat >expected <<\EOF &&
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7
+8
+<<<<<<< HEAD:original_file
+8.5
+=======
+9
+>>>>>>> rename^0:renamed_file
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'merge rename into master has correct extended markers' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git checkout master^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive rename^0 &&
+ test_cmp expected renamed_file
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup spurious "refusing to lose untracked" message' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ > irrelevant_file &&
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n" >original_file &&
+ git add irrelevant_file original_file &&
+ git commit -mA &&
+
+ git checkout -b rename &&
+ git mv original_file renamed_file &&
+ git commit -mB &&
+
+ git checkout master &&
+ git rm original_file &&
+ git commit -mC
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'no spurious "refusing to lose untracked" message' '
+ git checkout master^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge rename^0 2>errors.txt &&
+ ! grep "refusing to lose untracked file" errors.txt
+'
+
test_done
diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
index 871577d90c..dfee7d159b 100755
--- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
@@ -1,9 +1,15 @@
#!/bin/sh
-test_description='recursive merge corner cases'
+test_description='recursive merge corner cases involving criss-cross merges'
. ./test-lib.sh
+get_clean_checkout () {
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ git checkout "$1"
+}
+
#
# L1 L2
# o---o
@@ -51,23 +57,15 @@ test_expect_success 'merge simple rename+criss-cross with no modifications' '
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R2^0 &&
- test 5 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
- test 3 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
- test 0 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
- test $(git rev-parse :0:one) = $(git rev-parse L2:one) &&
- test $(git rev-parse :0:two) = $(git rev-parse R2:two) &&
test $(git rev-parse :2:three) = $(git rev-parse L2:three) &&
test $(git rev-parse :3:three) = $(git rev-parse R2:three) &&
- cp two merged &&
- >empty &&
- test_must_fail git merge-file \
- -L "Temporary merge branch 2" \
- -L "" \
- -L "Temporary merge branch 1" \
- merged empty one &&
- test $(git rev-parse :1:three) = $(git hash-object merged)
+ test $(git rev-parse L2:three) = $(git hash-object three~HEAD) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse R2:three) = $(git hash-object three~R2^0)
'
#
@@ -126,24 +124,15 @@ test_expect_success 'merge criss-cross + rename merges with basic modification'
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R2^0 &&
- test 5 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
- test 3 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
- test 0 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
- test $(git rev-parse :0:one) = $(git rev-parse L2:one) &&
- test $(git rev-parse :0:two) = $(git rev-parse R2:two) &&
test $(git rev-parse :2:three) = $(git rev-parse L2:three) &&
test $(git rev-parse :3:three) = $(git rev-parse R2:three) &&
- head -n 10 two >merged &&
- cp one merge-me &&
- >empty &&
- test_must_fail git merge-file \
- -L "Temporary merge branch 2" \
- -L "" \
- -L "Temporary merge branch 1" \
- merged empty merge-me &&
- test $(git rev-parse :1:three) = $(git hash-object merged)
+ test $(git rev-parse L2:three) = $(git hash-object three~HEAD) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse R2:three) = $(git hash-object three~R2^0)
'
#
@@ -231,4 +220,557 @@ test_expect_success 'git detects differently handled merges conflict' '
test $(git rev-parse :1:new_a) = $(git hash-object merged)
'
+#
+# criss-cross + modify/delete:
+#
+# B D
+# o---o
+# / \ / \
+# A o X ? F
+# \ / \ /
+# o---o
+# C E
+#
+# Commit A: file with contents 'A\n'
+# Commit B: file with contents 'B\n'
+# Commit C: file not present
+# Commit D: file with contents 'B\n'
+# Commit E: file not present
+#
+# Merging commits D & E should result in modify/delete conflict.
+
+test_expect_success 'setup criss-cross + modify/delete resolved differently' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ echo A >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+
+ git branch B &&
+ git checkout -b C &&
+ git rm file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m C &&
+
+ git checkout B &&
+ echo B >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge C &&
+ echo B >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m D &&
+ git tag D &&
+
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge B &&
+ git rm file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m E &&
+ git tag E
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git detects conflict merging criss-cross+modify/delete' '
+ git checkout D^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:file) = $(git rev-parse master:file) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:file) = $(git rev-parse B:file)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git detects conflict merging criss-cross+modify/delete, reverse direction' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git checkout E^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:file) = $(git rev-parse master:file) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:file) = $(git rev-parse B:file)
+'
+
+#
+# criss-cross + modify/modify with very contrived file contents:
+#
+# B D
+# o---o
+# / \ / \
+# A o X ? F
+# \ / \ /
+# o---o
+# C E
+#
+# Commit A: file with contents 'A\n'
+# Commit B: file with contents 'B\n'
+# Commit C: file with contents 'C\n'
+# Commit D: file with contents 'D\n'
+# Commit E: file with contents:
+# <<<<<<< Temporary merge branch 1
+# C
+# =======
+# B
+# >>>>>>> Temporary merge branch 2
+#
+# Now, when we merge commits D & E, does git detect the conflict?
+
+test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of content conflict' '
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ echo A >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+
+ git branch B &&
+ git checkout -b C &&
+ echo C >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m C &&
+
+ git checkout B &&
+ echo B >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge C &&
+ echo D >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m D &&
+ git tag D &&
+
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge B &&
+ cat <<EOF >file &&
+<<<<<<< Temporary merge branch 1
+C
+=======
+B
+>>>>>>> Temporary merge branch 2
+EOF
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m E &&
+ git tag E
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'git detects conflict w/ criss-cross+contrived resolution' '
+ git checkout D^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
+
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:file) = $(git rev-parse D:file) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:file) = $(git rev-parse E:file)
+'
+
+#
+# criss-cross + d/f conflict via add/add:
+# Commit A: Neither file 'a' nor directory 'a/' exist.
+# Commit B: Introduce 'a'
+# Commit C: Introduce 'a/file'
+# Commit D: Merge B & C, keeping 'a' and deleting 'a/'
+#
+# Two different later cases:
+# Commit E1: Merge B & C, deleting 'a' but keeping 'a/file'
+# Commit E2: Merge B & C, deleting 'a' but keeping a slightly modified 'a/file'
+#
+# B D
+# o---o
+# / \ / \
+# A o X ? F
+# \ / \ /
+# o---o
+# C E1 or E2
+#
+# Merging D & E1 requires we first create a virtual merge base X from
+# merging A & B in memory. Now, if X could keep both 'a' and 'a/file' in
+# the index, then the merge of D & E1 could be resolved cleanly with both
+# 'a' and 'a/file' removed. Since git does not currently allow creating
+# such a tree, the best we can do is have X contain both 'a~<unique>' and
+# 'a/file' resulting in the merge of D and E1 having a rename/delete
+# conflict for 'a'. (Although this merge appears to be unsolvable with git
+# currently, git could do a lot better than it currently does with these
+# d/f conflicts, which is the purpose of this test.)
+#
+# Merge of D & E2 has similar issues for path 'a', but should always result
+# in a modify/delete conflict for path 'a/file'.
+#
+# We run each merge in both directions, to check for directional issues
+# with D/F conflict handling.
+#
+
+test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of directory/file conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ >ignore-me &&
+ git add ignore-me &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git branch B &&
+ git checkout -b C &&
+ mkdir a &&
+ echo 10 >a/file &&
+ git add a/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m C &&
+
+ git checkout B &&
+ echo 5 >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge C &&
+ git clean -f &&
+ rm -rf a/ &&
+ echo 5 >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m D &&
+ git tag D &&
+
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge B &&
+ git clean -f &&
+ git rm --cached a &&
+ echo 10 >a/file &&
+ git add a/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m E1 &&
+ git tag E1 &&
+
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge B &&
+ git clean -f &&
+ git rm --cached a &&
+ printf "10\n11\n" >a/file &&
+ git add a/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m E2 &&
+ git tag E2
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'merge of D & E1 fails but has appropriate contents' '
+ get_clean_checkout D^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E1^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'merge of E1 & D fails but has appropriate contents' '
+ get_clean_checkout E1^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'merge of D & E2 fails but has appropriate contents' '
+ get_clean_checkout D^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E2^0 &&
+
+ test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:a/file) = $(git rev-parse E2:a/file) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:a/file) = $(git rev-parse C:a/file) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
+
+ test -f a~HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'merge of E2 & D fails but has appropriate contents' '
+ get_clean_checkout E2^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
+
+ test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:a/file) = $(git rev-parse E2:a/file) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:a/file) = $(git rev-parse C:a/file)
+ test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
+
+ test -f a~D^0
+'
+
+#
+# criss-cross with rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by
+# rename/rename(2to1)/modify:
+#
+# B D
+# o---o
+# / \ / \
+# A o X ? F
+# \ / \ /
+# o---o
+# C E
+#
+# Commit A: new file: a
+# Commit B: rename a->b, modifying by adding a line
+# Commit C: rename a->c
+# Commit D: merge B&C, resolving conflict by keeping contents in newname
+# Commit E: merge B&C, resolving conflict similar to D but adding another line
+#
+# There is a conflict merging B & C, but one of filename not of file
+# content. Whoever created D and E chose specific resolutions for that
+# conflict resolution. Now, since: (1) there is no content conflict
+# merging B & C, (2) D does not modify that merged content further, and (3)
+# both D & E resolve the name conflict in the same way, the modification to
+# newname in E should not cause any conflicts when it is merged with D.
+# (Note that this can be accomplished by having the virtual merge base have
+# the merged contents of b and c stored in a file named a, which seems like
+# the most logical choice anyway.)
+#
+# Comment from Junio: I do not necessarily agree with the choice "a", but
+# it feels sound to say "B and C do not agree what the final pathname
+# should be, but we know this content was derived from the common A:a so we
+# use one path whose name is arbitrary in the virtual merge base X between
+# D and E" and then further let the rename detection to notice that that
+# arbitrary path gets renamed between X-D to "newname" and X-E also to
+# "newname" to resolve it as both sides renaming it to the same new
+# name. It is akin to what we do at the content level, i.e. "B and C do not
+# agree what the final contents should be, so we leave the conflict marker
+# but that may cancel out at the final merge stage".
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by what looks like rename/rename(2to1)/modify' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ echo 7 >>b &&
+ git add -u &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ git commit -m C &&
+
+ git checkout -q B^0 &&
+ git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
+ git mv b newname &&
+ git commit -m "Merge commit C^0 into HEAD" &&
+ git tag D &&
+
+ git checkout -q C^0 &&
+ git merge --no-commit -s ours B^0 &&
+ git mv c newname &&
+ printf "7\n8\n" >>newname &&
+ git add -u &&
+ git commit -m "Merge commit B^0 into HEAD" &&
+ git tag E
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by what looks like rename/rename(2to1)/modify' '
+ git checkout D^0 &&
+
+ git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
+
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:newname) = $(git rev-parse E:newname)
+'
+
+#
+# criss-cross with rename/rename(1to2)/add-source + resolvable modify/modify:
+#
+# B D
+# o---o
+# / \ / \
+# A o X ? F
+# \ / \ /
+# o---o
+# C E
+#
+# Commit A: new file: a
+# Commit B: rename a->b
+# Commit C: rename a->c, add different a
+# Commit D: merge B&C, keeping b&c and (new) a modified at beginning
+# Commit E: merge B&C, keeping b&c and (new) a modified at end
+#
+# Merging commits D & E should result in no conflict; doing so correctly
+# requires getting the virtual merge base (from merging B&C) right, handling
+# renaming carefully (both in the virtual merge base and later), and getting
+# content merge handled.
+
+test_expect_success 'setup criss-cross + rename/rename/add + modify/modify' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "lots\nof\nwords\nand\ncontent\n" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ printf "2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m C &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
+ git checkout C -- a c &&
+ mv a old_a &&
+ echo 1 >a &&
+ cat old_a >>a &&
+ rm old_a &&
+ git add -u &&
+ git commit -m "Merge commit C^0 into HEAD" &&
+ git tag D &&
+
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ git merge --no-commit -s ours B^0 &&
+ git checkout B -- b &&
+ echo 8 >>a &&
+ git add -u &&
+ git commit -m "Merge commit B^0 into HEAD" &&
+ git tag E
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'detect rename/rename/add-source for virtual merge-base' '
+ git checkout D^0 &&
+
+ git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
+
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:b) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:c) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test "$(cat a)" = "$(printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n")"
+'
+
+#
+# criss-cross with rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest + simple modify:
+#
+# B D
+# o---o
+# / \ / \
+# A o X ? F
+# \ / \ /
+# o---o
+# C E
+#
+# Commit A: new file: a
+# Commit B: rename a->b, add c
+# Commit C: rename a->c
+# Commit D: merge B&C, keeping A:a and B:c
+# Commit E: merge B&C, keeping A:a and slightly modified c from B
+#
+# Merging commits D & E should result in no conflict. The virtual merge
+# base of B & C needs to not delete B:c for that to work, though...
+
+test_expect_success 'setup criss-cross+rename/rename/add-dest + simple modify' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n" >c &&
+ git add c &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ git commit -m C &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
+ git mv b a &&
+ git commit -m "D is like B but renames b back to a" &&
+ git tag D &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
+ git mv b a &&
+ echo 8 >>c &&
+ git add c &&
+ git commit -m "E like D but has mod in c" &&
+ git tag E
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'virtual merge base handles rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest' '
+ git checkout D^0 &&
+
+ git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:a) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:c) = $(git rev-parse E:c)
+'
+
test_done
diff --git a/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..32591f9413
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,578 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description="recursive merge corner cases w/ renames but not criss-crosses"
+# t6036 has corner cases that involve both criss-cross merges and renames
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename/delete + untracked file' '
+ echo "A pretty inscription" >ring &&
+ git add ring &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m beginning &&
+
+ git branch people &&
+ git checkout -b rename-the-ring &&
+ git mv ring one-ring-to-rule-them-all &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m fullname &&
+
+ git checkout people &&
+ git rm ring &&
+ echo gollum >owner &&
+ git add owner &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m track-people-instead-of-objects &&
+ echo "Myyy PRECIOUSSS" >ring
+'
+
+test_expect_success "Does git preserve Gollum's precious artifact?" '
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive rename-the-ring &&
+
+ # Make sure git did not delete an untracked file
+ test -f ring
+'
+
+# Testcase setup for rename/modify/add-source:
+# Commit A: new file: a
+# Commit B: modify a slightly
+# Commit C: rename a->b, add completely different a
+#
+# We should be able to merge B & C cleanly
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename/modify/add-source conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ echo 8 >>a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ echo something completely different >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m C
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'rename/modify/add-source conflict resolvable' '
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+
+ git merge -s recursive C^0 &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse B:a) = $(git rev-parse b) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse C:a) = $(git rev-parse a)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup resolvable conflict missed if rename missed' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n" >a &&
+ echo foo >b &&
+ git add a b &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ echo "Completely different content" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ echo 6 >>a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m C
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'conflict caused if rename not detected' '
+ git checkout -q C^0 &&
+ git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
+
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test 6 -eq $(wc -l < c) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:b) = $(git rev-parse A:b)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup conflict resolved wrong if rename missed' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -f &&
+
+ git checkout -b D A &&
+ echo 7 >>a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ echo "Completely different content" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m D &&
+
+ git checkout -b E A &&
+ git rm a &&
+ echo "Completely different content" >>a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m E
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'missed conflict if rename not detected' '
+ git checkout -q E^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0
+'
+
+# Tests for undetected rename/add-source causing a file to erroneously be
+# deleted (and for mishandled rename/rename(1to1) causing the same issue).
+#
+# This test uses a rename/rename(1to1)+add-source conflict (1to1 means the
+# same file is renamed on both sides to the same thing; it should trigger
+# the 1to2 logic, which it would do if the add-source didn't cause issues
+# for git's rename detection):
+# Commit A: new file: a
+# Commit B: rename a->b
+# Commit C: rename a->b, add unrelated a
+
+test_expect_success 'setup undetected rename/add-source causes data loss' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ echo foobar >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m C
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'detect rename/add-source and preserve all data' '
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+
+ git merge -s recursive C^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test -f a &&
+ test -f b &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:b) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:a) = $(git rev-parse C:a)
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'detect rename/add-source and preserve all data, merge other way' '
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+
+ git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test -f a &&
+ test -f b &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:b) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:a) = $(git rev-parse C:a)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup content merge + rename/directory conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n" >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m base &&
+ git tag base &&
+
+ git checkout -b right &&
+ echo 7 >>file &&
+ mkdir newfile &&
+ echo junk >newfile/realfile &&
+ git add file newfile/realfile &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m right &&
+
+ git checkout -b left-conflict base &&
+ echo 8 >>file &&
+ git add file &&
+ git mv file newfile &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m left &&
+
+ git checkout -b left-clean base &&
+ echo 0 >newfile &&
+ cat file >>newfile &&
+ git add newfile &&
+ git rm file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m left
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'rename/directory conflict + clean content merge' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+
+ git checkout left-clean^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive right^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ echo 0 >expect &&
+ git cat-file -p base:file >>expect &&
+ echo 7 >>expect &&
+ test_cmp expect newfile~HEAD &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:newfile) = $(git hash-object expect) &&
+
+ test -f newfile/realfile &&
+ test -f newfile~HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'rename/directory conflict + content merge conflict' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+
+ git checkout left-conflict^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive right^0 &&
+
+ test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ git cat-file -p left-conflict:newfile >left &&
+ git cat-file -p base:file >base &&
+ git cat-file -p right:file >right &&
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD:newfile" \
+ -L "" \
+ -L "right^0:file" \
+ left base right &&
+ test_cmp left newfile~HEAD &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:newfile) = $(git rev-parse base:file) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:newfile) = $(git rev-parse left-conflict:newfile) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:newfile) = $(git rev-parse right:file) &&
+
+ test -f newfile/realfile &&
+ test -f newfile~HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup content merge + rename/directory conflict w/ disappearing dir' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ mkdir sub &&
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n" >sub/file &&
+ git add sub/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m base &&
+ git tag base &&
+
+ git checkout -b right &&
+ echo 7 >>sub/file &&
+ git add sub/file &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m right &&
+
+ git checkout -b left base &&
+ echo 0 >newfile &&
+ cat sub/file >>newfile &&
+ git rm sub/file &&
+ mv newfile sub &&
+ git add sub &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m left
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'disappearing dir in rename/directory conflict handled' '
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+
+ git checkout left^0 &&
+
+ git merge -s recursive right^0 &&
+
+ test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ echo 0 >expect &&
+ git cat-file -p base:sub/file >>expect &&
+ echo 7 >>expect &&
+ test_cmp expect sub &&
+
+ test -f sub
+'
+
+# Test for all kinds of things that can go wrong with rename/rename (2to1):
+# Commit A: new files: a & b
+# Commit B: rename a->c, modify b
+# Commit C: rename b->c, modify a
+#
+# Merging of B & C should NOT be clean. Questions:
+# * Both a & b should be removed by the merge; are they?
+# * The two c's should contain modifications to a & b; do they?
+# * The index should contain two files, both for c; does it?
+# * The working copy should have two files, both of form c~<unique>; does it?
+# * Nothing else should be present. Is anything?
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename (2to1) + modify/modify' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n" >a &&
+ printf "5\n4\n3\n2\n1\n" >b &&
+ git add a b &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ echo 0 >>b &&
+ git add b &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv b c &&
+ echo 6 >>a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m C
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' '
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive C^0 >out &&
+ grep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u c | wc -l) &&
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test ! -f a &&
+ test ! -f b &&
+ test -f c~HEAD &&
+ test -f c~C^0 &&
+
+ test $(git hash-object c~HEAD) = $(git rev-parse C:a) &&
+ test $(git hash-object c~C^0) = $(git rev-parse B:b)
+'
+
+# Testcase setup for simple rename/rename (1to2) conflict:
+# Commit A: new file: a
+# Commit B: rename a->b
+# Commit C: rename a->c
+test_expect_success 'setup simple rename/rename (1to2) conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ echo stuff >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m C
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'merge has correct working tree contents' '
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
+
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:a) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:b) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:c) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+
+ test ! -f a &&
+ test $(git hash-object b) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git hash-object c) = $(git rev-parse A:a)
+'
+
+# Testcase setup for rename/rename(1to2)/add-source conflict:
+# Commit A: new file: a
+# Commit B: rename a->b
+# Commit C: rename a->c, add completely different a
+#
+# Merging of B & C should NOT be clean; there's a rename/rename conflict
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-source conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n" >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ git commit -m B &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ echo something completely different >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m C
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'detect conflict with rename/rename(1to2)/add-source merge' '
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive C^0 &&
+
+ test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse 3:a) = $(git rev-parse C:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse 1:a) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse 2:b) = $(git rev-parse B:b) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse 3:c) = $(git rev-parse C:c) &&
+
+ test -f a &&
+ test -f b &&
+ test -f c
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-source resolvable conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m base &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m one &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ echo important-info >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m two
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'rename/rename/add-source still tracks new a file' '
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
+
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:a) = $(git rev-parse C:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse HEAD:b) = $(git rev-parse A:a)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest conflict' '
+ git rm -rf . &&
+ git clean -fdqx &&
+ rm -rf .git &&
+ git init &&
+
+ echo stuff >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m base &&
+ git tag A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B A &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ echo precious-data >c &&
+ git add c &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m one &&
+
+ git checkout -b C A &&
+ git mv a c &&
+ echo important-info >b &&
+ git add b &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m two
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'rename/rename/add-dest merge still knows about conflicting file versions' '
+ git checkout C^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
+
+ test 5 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u b | wc -l) &&
+ test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u c | wc -l) &&
+ test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
+
+ test $(git rev-parse :1:a) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:b) = $(git rev-parse C:b) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:b) = $(git rev-parse B:b) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :2:c) = $(git rev-parse C:c) &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :3:c) = $(git rev-parse B:c) &&
+
+ test $(git hash-object c~HEAD) = $(git rev-parse C:c) &&
+ test $(git hash-object c~B\^0) = $(git rev-parse B:c) &&
+ test $(git hash-object b~HEAD) = $(git rev-parse C:b) &&
+ test $(git hash-object b~B\^0) = $(git rev-parse B:b) &&
+
+ test ! -f b &&
+ test ! -f c
+'
+
+test_done