remote.c: return upstream name from stat_tracking_info

After calling stat_tracking_info, callers often want to
print the name of the upstream branch (in addition to the
tracking count). To do this, they have to access
branch->merge->dst[0] themselves. This is not wrong, as the
return value from stat_tracking_info tells us whether we
have an upstream branch or not. But it is a bit leaky, as we
make an assumption about how it calculated the upstream
name.

Instead, let's add an out-parameter that lets the caller
know the upstream name we found.

As a bonus, we can get rid of the unusual tri-state return
from the function. We no longer need to use it to
differentiate between "no tracking config" and "tracking ref
does not exist" (since you can check the upstream_name for
that), so we can just use the usual 0/-1 convention for
success/error.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index 853419f05f..4313b9d845 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -1532,21 +1532,15 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print_tracking(struct wt_status *s)
 
 	color_fprintf(s->fp, branch_color_local, "%s", branch_name);
 
-	switch (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs)) {
-	case 0:
-		/* no base */
-		fputc(s->null_termination ? '\0' : '\n', s->fp);
-		return;
-	case -1:
-		/* with "gone" base */
+	if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours, &num_theirs, &base) < 0) {
+		if (!base) {
+			fputc(s->null_termination ? '\0' : '\n', s->fp);
+			return;
+		}
+
 		upstream_is_gone = 1;
-		break;
-	default:
-		/* with base */
-		break;
 	}
 
-	base = branch->merge[0]->dst;
 	base = shorten_unambiguous_ref(base, 0);
 	color_fprintf(s->fp, header_color, "...");
 	color_fprintf(s->fp, branch_color_remote, "%s", base);