diff options
author | Jeff King <peff@peff.net> | 2017-07-13 11:09:32 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2017-07-13 12:42:51 -0700 |
commit | 11b087adfd469ca597f1d269314f8cad32d0d72f (patch) | |
tree | e0474bf5f8703ab737ca9fd59cae31c0813cc652 /walker.h | |
parent | pretty: respect color settings for %C placeholders (diff) | |
download | tgif-11b087adfd469ca597f1d269314f8cad32d0d72f.tar.xz |
ref-filter: consult want_color() before emitting colors
When color placeholders like %(color:red) are used in a
ref-filter format, we unconditionally output the colors,
even if the user has asked us for no colors. This usually
isn't a problem when the user is constructing a --format on
the command line, but it means we may do the wrong thing
when the format is fed from a script or alias. For example:
$ git config alias.b 'branch --format=%(color:green)%(refname)'
$ git b --no-color
should probably omit the green color. Likewise, running:
$ git b >branches
should probably also omit the color, just as we would for
all baked-in coloring (and as we recently started to do for
user-specified colors in --pretty formats).
This commit makes both of those cases work by teaching
the ref-filter code to consult want_color() before
outputting any color. The color flag in ref_format defaults
to "-1", which means we'll consult color.ui, which in turn
defaults to the usual isatty() check on stdout. However,
callers like git-branch which support their own color config
(and command-line options) can override that.
The new tests independently cover all three of the callers
of ref-filter (for-each-ref, tag, and branch). Even though
these seem redundant, it confirms that we've correctly
plumbed through all of the necessary config to make colors
work by default.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'walker.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions