summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>2011-10-13 08:59:04 -0400
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2011-10-13 10:16:59 -0700
commit72251b7de6daf2cd7916e3aad46df0047e5a5d2b (patch)
tree76ab58c1b7c1efec10656c6e45dbaa70192b35f6 /t
parentUpdate draft release notes to 1.7.8 (diff)
downloadtgif-72251b7de6daf2cd7916e3aad46df0047e5a5d2b.tar.xz
submodule: Demonstrate known breakage during recursive merge
Since commit 68d03e4a (Implement automatic fast-forward merge for submodules, 2010-07-07) we try to suggest submodule commits that resolve a conflict. Consider a true recursive merge case b---bc / \ / o X \ / \ c---cb in which the two heads themselves (bc,cb) had resolved a submodule conflict (i.e. reference different commits than their parents). The submodule merge search runs during the temporary merge of the two merge bases (b,c) and prints out a suggestion that is not meaningful to the user. Then during the main merge the submodule merge search runs again but dies with the message fatal: --ancestry-path given but there are no bottom commits while trying to enumerate candidates. Demonstrate this known breakage with a new test in t7405-submodule-merge covering the case. Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't')
-rwxr-xr-xt/t7405-submodule-merge.sh51
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh b/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
index a8fb30b792..14da2e3654 100755
--- a/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
+++ b/t/t7405-submodule-merge.sh
@@ -228,4 +228,55 @@ test_expect_success 'merging with a modify/modify conflict between merge bases'
git merge d
'
+# canonical criss-cross history in top and submodule
+test_expect_success 'setup for recursive merge with submodule' '
+ mkdir merge-recursive &&
+ (cd merge-recursive &&
+ git init &&
+ mkdir sub &&
+ (cd sub &&
+ git init &&
+ test_commit a &&
+ git checkout -b sub-b master &&
+ test_commit b &&
+ git checkout -b sub-c master &&
+ test_commit c &&
+ git checkout -b sub-bc sub-b &&
+ git merge sub-c &&
+ git checkout -b sub-cb sub-c &&
+ git merge sub-b &&
+ git checkout master) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m a &&
+ git checkout -b top-b master &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-b) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m b &&
+ git checkout -b top-c master &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-c) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m c &&
+ git checkout -b top-bc top-b &&
+ git merge -s ours --no-commit top-c &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-bc) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m bc &&
+ git checkout -b top-cb top-c &&
+ git merge -s ours --no-commit top-b &&
+ (cd sub && git checkout sub-cb) &&
+ git add sub &&
+ git commit -m cb)
+'
+
+# merge should leave submodule unmerged in index
+test_expect_failure 'recursive merge with submodule' '
+ (cd merge-recursive &&
+ test_must_fail git merge top-bc &&
+ echo "160000 $(git rev-parse top-cb:sub) 2 sub" > expect2 &&
+ echo "160000 $(git rev-parse top-bc:sub) 3 sub" > expect3 &&
+ git ls-files -u > actual &&
+ grep "$(cat expect2)" actual > /dev/null &&
+ grep "$(cat expect3)" actual > /dev/null)
+'
+
test_done