summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t9121
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Jeff King <peff@peff.net>2014-02-24 02:46:37 -0500
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2014-02-24 10:12:58 -0800
commit1dca155fe3fac29e847d2d8ff1087d892a129a9c (patch)
tree05e4d112c5893403f7ec5614914ae4469a070b1b /t/t9121
parentdate: check date overflow against time_t (diff)
downloadtgif-1dca155fe3fac29e847d2d8ff1087d892a129a9c.tar.xz
log: handle integer overflow in timestamps
If an ident line has a ridiculous date value like (2^64)+1, we currently just pass ULONG_MAX along to the date code, which can produce nonsensical dates. On systems with a signed long time_t (e.g., 64-bit glibc systems), this actually doesn't end up too bad. The ULONG_MAX is converted to -1, we apply the timezone field to that, and the result ends up somewhere between Dec 31, 1969 and Jan 1, 1970. However, there is still a few good reasons to detect the overflow explicitly: 1. On systems where "unsigned long" is smaller than time_t, we get a nonsensical date in the future. 2. Even where it would produce "Dec 31, 1969", it's easier to recognize "midnight Jan 1" as a consistent sentinel value for "we could not parse this". 3. Values which do not overflow strtoul but do overflow a signed time_t produce nonsensical values in the past. For example, on a 64-bit system with a signed long time_t, a timestamp of 18446744073000000000 produces a date in 1947. We also recognize overflow in the timezone field, which could produce nonsensical results. In this case we show the parsed date, but in UTC. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t9121')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions