summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t6019-rev-list-ancestry-path.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2022-03-30 17:09:16 -0700
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2022-03-31 13:12:26 -0700
commit6563706568b952d85c050b208b5301303d32810c (patch)
treee4eef4559f935aa7b35fbae63ca008e70b5ee0bf /t/t6019-rev-list-ancestry-path.sh
parentGit 2.35.1 (diff)
downloadtgif-6563706568b952d85c050b208b5301303d32810c.tar.xz
CodingGuidelines: give deadline for "for (int i = 0; ..."
We raised the weather balloon to see if we can allow the construct in 44ba10d6 (revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for() loop, 2021-11-14), which was shipped as a part of Git v2.35. Document that fact in the coding guidelines, and more importantly, give ourselves a deadline to revisit and update. Let's declare that we will officially adopt the variable declaration in the initializaiton part of "for ()" statement this winter, unless we find that a platform we care about does not grok it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t6019-rev-list-ancestry-path.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions