summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2020-07-10 17:19:53 +0000
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2020-07-10 13:53:37 -0700
commit523fa69c36744ae6779e38614cb9bfb2be552923 (patch)
treea8359c7dbb0b22867b07f1502fb38a43550a717a /t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh
parentbisect: treat BISECT_HEAD as a pseudo ref (diff)
downloadtgif-523fa69c36744ae6779e38614cb9bfb2be552923.tar.xz
reflog: cleanse messages in the refs.c layer
Regarding reflog messages: - We expect that a reflog message consists of a single line. The file format used by the files backend may add a LF after the message as a delimiter, and output by commands like "git log -g" may complete such an incomplete line by adding a LF at the end, but philosophically, the terminating LF is not a part of the message. - We however allow callers of refs API to supply a random sequence of NUL terminated bytes. We cleanse caller-supplied message by squashing a run of whitespaces into a SP, and by trimming trailing whitespace, before storing the message. This is how we tolerate, instead of erring out, a message with LF in it (be it at the end, in the middle, or both). Currently, the cleansing of the reflog message is done by the files backend, before the log is written out. This is sufficient with the current code, as that is the only backend that writes reflogs. But new backends can be added that write reflogs, and we'd want the resulting log message we would read out of "log -g" the same no matter what backend is used, and moving the code to do so to the generic layer is a way to do so. An added benefit is that the "cleansing" function could be updated later, independent from individual backends, to e.g. allow multi-line log messages if we wanted to, and when that happens, it would help a lot to ensure we covered all bases if the cleansing function (which would be updated) is called from the generic layer. Side note: I am not interested in supporting multi-line reflog messages right at the moment (nobody is asking for it), but I envision that instead of the "squash a run of whitespaces into a SP and rtrim" cleansing, we can %urlencode problematic bytes in the message *AND* append a SP at the end, when a new version of Git that supports multi-line and/or verbatim reflog messages writes a reflog record. The reading side can detect the presense of SP at the end (which should have been rtrimmed out if it were written by existing versions of Git) as a signal that decoding %urlencode recovers the original reflog message. Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions