summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t4034/objc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2015-06-01 12:12:04 -0700
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2015-06-01 12:12:04 -0700
commitad6e8ed37bc139c64b1b75a7a9ff6e4054f71756 (patch)
tree01ec3399ee925d68a72ef93337f256311a1e93e3 /t/t4034/objc
parentGit 2.2.2 (diff)
downloadtgif-ad6e8ed37bc139c64b1b75a7a9ff6e4054f71756.tar.xz
apply: reject a hunk that does not do anything
A hunk like this in a hand-edited patch without correctly adjusting the line counts: @@ -660,2 +660,2 @@ inline struct sk_buff *ieee80211_authentic... auth = (struct ieee80211_authentication *) skb_put(skb, sizeof(struct ieee80211_authentication)); - some old text + some new text -- 2.1.0 dev mailing list at the end of the input does not have a good way for us to diagnose it as a corrupt patch. We just read two context lines and discard the remainder as cruft, which we must do in order to ignore the e-mail footer. Notice that the patch does not change anything and signal an error. Note that this fix will not help if the hand-edited hunk header were "@@ -660,3, +660,2" to include the removal. We would just remove the old text without adding the new one, and treat "+ some new text" and everything after that line as trailing cruft. So it is dubious that this patch alone would help very much in practice, but it may be better than nothing. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t4034/objc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions