diff options
author | Jeff King <peff@peff.net> | 2015-09-24 17:08:28 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2015-10-05 11:08:06 -0700 |
commit | 144e4cf7092ee8cff44e9c7600aaa7515ad6a78f (patch) | |
tree | 110d0c3b8b07e0b8cee2c843314361d3ea91df56 /t/t4034/bibtex/expect | |
parent | convert strncpy to memcpy (diff) | |
download | tgif-144e4cf7092ee8cff44e9c7600aaa7515ad6a78f.tar.xz |
fsck: drop inode-sorting code
Fsck tries to access loose objects in order of inode number,
with the hope that this would make cold cache access faster
on a spinning disk. This dates back to 7e8c174 (fsck-cache:
sort entries by inode number, 2005-05-02), which predates
the invention of packfiles.
These days, there's not much point in trying to optimize
cold cache for a large number of loose objects. You are much
better off to simply pack the objects, which will reduce the
disk footprint _and_ provide better locality of data access.
So while you can certainly construct pathological cases
where this code might help, it is not worth the trouble
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t4034/bibtex/expect')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions