summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3306-notes-prune.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Jeff King <peff@peff.net>2013-08-23 20:02:31 -0400
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2013-08-24 22:31:47 -0700
commit3b910d0c5ee3a06ba0463f97ccf59815e7b37e29 (patch)
tree32c379df8128dd68eccdc130e942418676ceccc8 /t/t3306-notes-prune.sh
parentsha1-lookup: handle duplicate keys with GIT_USE_LOOKUP (diff)
downloadtgif-3b910d0c5ee3a06ba0463f97ccf59815e7b37e29.tar.xz
add tests for indexing packs with delta cycles
If we receive a broken or malicious pack from a remote, we will feed it to index-pack. As index-pack processes the objects as a stream, reconstructing and hashing each object to get its name, it is not very susceptible to doing the wrong with bad data (it simply notices that the data is bogus and aborts). However, one question raised on the list is whether it could be susceptible to problems during the delta-resolution phase. In particular, can a cycle in the packfile deltas cause us to go into an infinite loop or cause any other problem? The answer is no. We cannot have a cycle of delta-base offsets, because they go only in one direction (the OFS_DELTA object mentions its base by an offset towards the beginning of the file, and we explicitly reject negative offsets). We can have a cycle of REF_DELTA objects, which refer to base objects by sha1 name. However, index-pack does not know these sha1 names ahead of time; it has to reconstruct the objects to get their names, and it cannot do so if there is a delta cycle (in other words, it does not even realize there is a cycle, but only that there are items that cannot be resolved). Even though we can reason out that index-pack should handle this fine, let's add a few tests to make sure it behaves correctly. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t3306-notes-prune.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions