diff options
author | Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> | 2020-01-15 23:39:53 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2020-01-17 13:52:14 -0800 |
commit | 31877c9aec21e0824fd4fcf415069cf8dfae4b72 (patch) | |
tree | ed78b3edfb08a2f65c47dede4d320af072b46c71 /t/t3303-notes-subtrees.sh | |
parent | replace-object: make replace operations thread-safe (diff) | |
download | tgif-31877c9aec21e0824fd4fcf415069cf8dfae4b72.tar.xz |
object-store: allow threaded access to object reading
Allow object reading to be performed by multiple threads protecting it
with an internal lock, the obj_read_mutex. The lock usage can be toggled
with enable_obj_read_lock() and disable_obj_read_lock(). Currently, the
functions which can be safely called in parallel are:
read_object_file_extended(), repo_read_object_file(),
read_object_file(), read_object_with_reference(), read_object(),
oid_object_info() and oid_object_info_extended(). It's also possible
to use obj_read_lock() and obj_read_unlock() to protect other sections
that cannot execute in parallel with object reading.
Probably there are many spots in the functions listed above that could
be executed unlocked (and thus, in parallel). But, for now, we are most
interested in allowing parallel access to zlib inflation. This is one of
the sections where object reading spends most of the time in (e.g. up to
one-third of git-grep's execution time in the chromium repo corresponds
to inflation) and it's already thread-safe. So, to take advantage of
that, the obj_read_mutex is released when calling git_inflate() and
re-acquired right after, for every calling spot in
oid_object_info_extended()'s call chain. We may refine this lock to also
exploit other possible parallel spots in the future, but for now,
threaded zlib inflation should already give great speedups for threaded
object reading callers.
Note that add_delta_base_cache() was also modified to skip adding
already present entries to the cache. This wasn't possible before, but
it would be now, with the parallel inflation. Take for example the
following situation, where two threads - A and B - are executing the
code at unpack_entry():
1. Thread A is performing the decompression of a base O (which is not
yet in the cache) at PHASE II. Thread B is simultaneously trying to
unpack O, but just starting at PHASE I.
2. Since O is not yet in the cache, B will go to PHASE II to also
perform the decompression.
3. When they finish decompressing, one of them will get the object
reading mutex and go to PHASE III while the other waits for the
mutex. Let’s say A got the mutex first.
4. Thread A will add O to the cache, go throughout the rest of PHASE III
and return.
5. Thread B gets the mutex, also add O to the cache (if the check wasn't
there) and returns.
Finally, it is also important to highlight that the object reading lock
can only ensure thread-safety in the mentioned functions thanks to two
complementary mechanisms: the use of 'struct raw_object_store's
replace_mutex, which guards sections in the object reading machinery
that would otherwise be thread-unsafe; and the 'struct pack_window's
inuse_cnt, which protects window reading operations (such as the one
performed during the inflation of a packed object), allowing them to
execute without the acquisition of the obj_read_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t3303-notes-subtrees.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions