diff options
author | Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> | 2019-12-06 16:06:12 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2019-12-06 09:32:02 -0800 |
commit | 430b75f7209c554d88e3554eb54cebf4ba1e4608 (patch) | |
tree | 6745a135ed8abea555e14fe2d28a4805793b8531 /t/t0009-prio-queue.sh | |
parent | commit: encapsulate determine_whence() for sequencer (diff) | |
download | tgif-430b75f7209c554d88e3554eb54cebf4ba1e4608.tar.xz |
commit: give correct advice for empty commit during a rebase
In dcb500dc16c (cherry-pick/revert: advise using --skip, 2019-07-02),
`git commit` learned to suggest to run `git cherry-pick --skip` when
trying to cherry-pick an empty patch.
However, it was overlooked that there are more conditions than just a
`git cherry-pick` when this advice is printed (which originally
suggested the neutral `git reset`): the same can happen during a rebase.
Let's suggest the correct command, even during a rebase.
While at it, we adjust more places in `builtin/commit.c` that
incorrectly assumed that the presence of a `CHERRY_PICK_HEAD` meant that
surely this must be a `cherry-pick` in progress.
Note: we take pains to handle the situation when a user runs a `git
cherry-pick` _during_ a rebase. This is quite valid (e.g. in an `exec`
line in an interactive rebase). On the other hand, it is not possible to
run a rebase during a cherry-pick, meaning: if both `rebase-merge/` and
`sequencer/` exist or CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and REBASE_HEAD point to the same
commit , we still want to advise to use `git cherry-pick --skip`.
Original-patch-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t0009-prio-queue.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions