diff options
author | Jim Hill <gjthill@gmail.com> | 2015-05-17 17:41:45 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2015-05-18 10:15:20 -0700 |
commit | f6a1e1e288d13472f5f7fe2b907bb8c0bd69a018 (patch) | |
tree | 6466b0dfe46eac30cb7174c8c7f20f0418a0f306 /argv-array.c | |
parent | Merge branch 'maint-1.9' into maint-2.0 (diff) | |
download | tgif-f6a1e1e288d13472f5f7fe2b907bb8c0bd69a018.tar.xz |
sha1_file: pass empty buffer to index empty file
`git add` of an empty file with a filter pops complaints from
`copy_fd` about a bad file descriptor.
This traces back to these lines in sha1_file.c:index_core:
if (!size) {
ret = index_mem(sha1, NULL, size, type, path, flags);
The problem here is that content to be added to the index can be
supplied from an fd, or from a memory buffer, or from a pathname. This
call is supplying a NULL buffer pointer and a zero size.
Downstream logic takes the complete absence of a buffer to mean the
data is to be found elsewhere -- for instance, these, from convert.c:
if (params->src) {
write_err = (write_in_full(child_process.in, params->src, params->size) < 0);
} else {
write_err = copy_fd(params->fd, child_process.in);
}
~If there's a buffer, write from that, otherwise the data must be coming
from an open fd.~
Perfectly reasonable logic in a routine that's going to write from
either a buffer or an fd.
So change `index_core` to supply an empty buffer when indexing an empty
file.
There's a patch out there that instead changes the logic quoted above to
take a `-1` fd to mean "use the buffer", but it seems to me that the
distinction between a missing buffer and an empty one carries intrinsic
semantics, where the logic change is adapting the code to handle
incorrect arguments.
Signed-off-by: Jim Hill <gjthill@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'argv-array.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions