summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Jeff King <peff@peff.net>2011-05-24 15:45:27 -0400
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2011-05-24 15:57:03 -0700
commit55601c6a4598f3b37e8269beff3275d6592053dd (patch)
tree0a49d4ebc53277769534aedfb8b7299248afdb03 /Documentation
parentUpdate 1.7.6 draft release notes (diff)
downloadtgif-55601c6a4598f3b37e8269beff3275d6592053dd.tar.xz
doc: discuss textconv versus external diff drivers
We already talk about how to use each one and how they work, but it is a reasonable question to wonder why one might use one over the other. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/gitattributes.txt31
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/gitattributes.txt b/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
index 15aebc6062..412c55b549 100644
--- a/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
@@ -593,6 +593,37 @@ and now produces better output), you can remove the cache
manually with `git update-ref -d refs/notes/textconv/jpg` (where
"jpg" is the name of the diff driver, as in the example above).
+Choosing textconv versus external diff
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+If you want to show differences between binary or specially-formatted
+blobs in your repository, you can choose to use either an external diff
+command, or to use textconv to convert them to a diff-able text format.
+Which method you choose depends on your exact situation.
+
+The advantage of using an external diff command is flexibility. You are
+not bound to find line-oriented changes, nor is it necessary for the
+output to resemble unified diff. You are free to locate and report
+changes in the most appropriate way for your data format.
+
+A textconv, by comparison, is much more limiting. You provide a
+transformation of the data into a line-oriented text format, and git
+uses its regular diff tools to generate the output. There are several
+advantages to choosing this method:
+
+1. Ease of use. It is often much simpler to write a binary to text
+ transformation than it is to perform your own diff. In many cases,
+ existing programs can be used as textconv filters (e.g., exif,
+ odt2txt).
+
+2. Git diff features. By performing only the transformation step
+ yourself, you can still utilize many of git's diff features,
+ including colorization, word-diff, and combined diffs for merges.
+
+3. Caching. Textconv caching can speed up repeated diffs, such as those
+ you might trigger by running `git log -p`.
+
+
Marking files as binary
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^