summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>2007-03-23 17:38:22 -0700
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>2007-03-23 23:38:04 -0700
commit1c2c6112a4bf655faa768ddfca067945edf2809e (patch)
tree985973c2d5ac3611db6e25f702eecacf7cb41939 /Documentation
parentt6004: add a bit more path optimization test. (diff)
parentMerge branch 'maint' (diff)
downloadtgif-1c2c6112a4bf655faa768ddfca067945edf2809e.tar.xz
Merge branch 'master' into jc/bisect
This is to merge in the fix for path-limited bisection from the 'master' branch.
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/git-am.txt2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/git-bisect.txt130
-rw-r--r--Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt10
3 files changed, 100 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-am.txt b/Documentation/git-am.txt
index 4fb1d84413..13a7389867 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-am.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-am.txt
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ default. You could use `--no-utf8` to override this.
the patch.
-C<n>, -p<n>::
- These flag are passed to the `git-apply` program that applies
+ These flags are passed to the `git-apply` program that applies
the patch.
--interactive::
diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
index 16ec7269b2..b2bc58d851 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
DESCRIPTION
-----------
-The command takes various subcommands, and different options
-depending on the subcommand:
+The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
+on the subcommand:
git bisect start [<paths>...]
git bisect bad <rev>
@@ -22,30 +22,34 @@ depending on the subcommand:
git bisect visualize
git bisect replay <logfile>
git bisect log
+ git bisect run <cmd>...
-This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive
-the binary search process to find which change introduced a bug,
-given an old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit
-object name.
+This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive the
+binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an
+old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name.
+
+Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The way you use it is:
------------------------------------------------
$ git bisect start
-$ git bisect bad # Current version is bad
-$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
- # tested that was good
+$ git bisect bad # Current version is bad
+$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
+ # tested that was good
------------------------------------------------
-When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will
-bisect the revision tree and say something like:
+When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect
+the revision tree and say something like:
------------------------------------------------
Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this
------------------------------------------------
-and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and boot
-it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just do
+and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and
+boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just
+do
------------------------------------------------
$ git bisect good # this one is good
@@ -57,12 +61,15 @@ which will now say
Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
------------------------------------------------
-and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending on
-whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect bad",
-and ask for the next bisection.
+and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending
+on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect
+bad", and ask for the next bisection.
+
+Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first
+bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
-Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first bad
-kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
+Bisect reset
+~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
@@ -70,10 +77,13 @@ Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
$ git bisect reset
------------------------------------------------
-to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the bisection
-branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, actually: it will
-reset the bisection state, and before it does that it checks that you're
-not using some old bisection branch).
+to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the
+bisection branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too,
+actually: it will reset the bisection state, and before it does that
+it checks that you're not using some old bisection branch).
+
+Bisect visualize
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
During the bisection process, you can say
@@ -83,9 +93,17 @@ $ git bisect visualize
to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`.
-The good/bad input is logged, and `git bisect
-log` shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its
-output somewhere and save it in a file, and run
+Bisect log and bisect replay
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The good/bad input is logged, and
+
+------------
+$ git bisect log
+------------
+
+shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere
+and save it in a file, and run
------------
$ git bisect replay that-file
@@ -94,12 +112,16 @@ $ git bisect replay that-file
if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a
revision.
-If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect
-suggested to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change
-the commit introduces is known not to work in your environment
-and you know it does not have anything to do with the bug you
-are chasing), you may want to find a near-by commit and try that
-instead. It goes something like this:
+Avoiding to test a commit
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested
+to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit
+introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it
+does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may
+want to find a near-by commit and try that instead.
+
+It goes something like this:
------------
$ git bisect good/bad # previous round was good/bad.
@@ -109,18 +131,52 @@ $ git reset --hard HEAD~3 # try 3 revs before what
# was suggested
------------
-Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that,
-tell bisect what the result was as usual.
+Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell
+bisect what the result was as usual.
-You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what
-part of the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking
-down, by giving paths parameters when you say `bisect start`,
-like this:
+Cutting down bisection by giving path parameter to bisect start
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of
+the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving
+paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this:
------------
$ git bisect start arch/i386 include/asm-i386
------------
+Bisect run
+~~~~~~~~~~
+
+If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good
+or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
+
+------------
+$ git bisect run my_script
+------------
+
+Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
+exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good and with a
+code between 1 and 127 (included) in case the current source code is
+bad.
+
+Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A
+program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page,
+the value is chopped with "& 0377".)
+
+You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant
+tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or
+"revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to
+work around other problem this bisection is not interested in")
+applied to the revision being tested.
+
+To cope with such a situation, after the inner git-bisect finds the
+next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak
+before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the
+revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the
+tree to the pristine state. Finally the "run" script can exit with
+the status of the real test to let "git bisect run" command loop to
+know the outcome.
Author
------
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt
index 0e1ffb2427..9ce3c473ae 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-format.txt
@@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ GIT pack format
which looks like this:
(undeltified representation)
- n-byte type and length (4-bit type, (n-1)*7+4-bit length)
+ n-byte type and length (3-bit type, (n-1)*7+4-bit length)
compressed data
(deltified representation)
- n-byte type and length (4-bit type, (n-1)*7+4-bit length)
+ n-byte type and length (3-bit type, (n-1)*7+4-bit length)
20-byte base object name
compressed delta data
@@ -102,11 +102,13 @@ trailer | | packfile checksum |
Pack file entry: <+
packed object header:
- 1-byte type (upper 4-bit)
+ 1-byte size extension bit (MSB)
+ type (next 3 bit)
size0 (lower 4-bit)
n-byte sizeN (as long as MSB is set, each 7-bit)
size0..sizeN form 4+7+7+..+7 bit integer, size0
- is the most significant part.
+ is the least significant part, and sizeN is the
+ most significant part.
packed object data:
If it is not DELTA, then deflated bytes (the size above
is the size before compression).