diff options
author | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2014-04-08 12:00:27 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2014-04-08 12:00:28 -0700 |
commit | d59c12d7ad39f942fc60578ba1e934822f40445b (patch) | |
tree | f0591d6490164e7a8a672c79094a2d612899cfb7 /Documentation/howto | |
parent | Merge branch 'mh/update-ref-batch-create-fix' (diff) | |
parent | code and test: fix misuses of "nor" (diff) | |
download | tgif-d59c12d7ad39f942fc60578ba1e934822f40445b.tar.xz |
Merge branch 'jl/nor-or-nand-and'
Eradicate mistaken use of "nor" (that is, essentially "nor" used
not in "neither A nor B" ;-)) from in-code comments, command output
strings, and documentations.
* jl/nor-or-nand-and:
code and test: fix misuses of "nor"
comments: fix misuses of "nor"
contrib: fix misuses of "nor"
Documentation: fix misuses of "nor"
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/howto')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.txt | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/howto/revert-branch-rebase.txt | 2 |
3 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.txt b/Documentation/howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.txt index 19ab604f1f..02cb5f758d 100644 --- a/Documentation/howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.txt +++ b/Documentation/howto/rebase-from-internal-branch.txt @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ You fetch from upstream, but not merge. $ git fetch upstream This leaves the updated upstream head in .git/FETCH_HEAD but -does not touch your .git/HEAD nor .git/refs/heads/master. +does not touch your .git/HEAD or .git/refs/heads/master. You run "git rebase" now. $ git rebase FETCH_HEAD master diff --git a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt index acf3e477e5..462255ed5d 100644 --- a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt +++ b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ where C and D are to fix what was broken in A and B, and you may already have some other changes on the mainline after W. If you merge the updated side branch (with D at its tip), none of the -changes made in A nor B will be in the result, because they were reverted +changes made in A or B will be in the result, because they were reverted by W. That is what Alan saw. Linus explains the situation: @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ with: $ git revert W This history would (ignoring possible conflicts between what W and W..Y -changed) be equivalent to not having W nor Y at all in the history: +changed) be equivalent to not having W or Y at all in the history: ---o---o---o---M---x---x-------x---- / diff --git a/Documentation/howto/revert-branch-rebase.txt b/Documentation/howto/revert-branch-rebase.txt index 85f69dbac9..149508e13b 100644 --- a/Documentation/howto/revert-branch-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/howto/revert-branch-rebase.txt @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ $ make clean test ;# make sure it did not cause other breakage. ------------------------------------------------ Everything is in the good order. I do not need the temporary branch -nor tag anymore, so remove them: +or tag anymore, so remove them: ------------------------------------------------ $ rm -f .git/refs/tags/pu-anchor |