summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-pull.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Jeff King <peff@peff.net>2018-08-10 19:16:40 -0400
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2018-08-13 13:48:29 -0700
commitaa2f5ef5004704cd01282a1f1a9f99459c9dc021 (patch)
tree6f3bf42a4c73564137073295a4de1c8826574c27 /Documentation/git-pull.txt
parentfor_each_packed_object: support iterating in pack-order (diff)
downloadtgif-aa2f5ef5004704cd01282a1f1a9f99459c9dc021.tar.xz
t1006: test cat-file --batch-all-objects with duplicates
The test for --batch-all-objects in t1006 covers a variety of object storage situations, but one thing it doesn't cover is that we avoid mentioning duplicate objects. We won't have any because running "git repack -ad" will have packed them all and deleted the loose ones. This does work (because we sort and de-dup the output list), but it's good to include it in our test. And doubly so for when we add an unordered mode which has to de-dup in a different way. Note that we cannot just re-create one of the objects, as Git will omit the write of an object that is already present. However, we can create a new pack with one of the objects, which forces the duplication. One alternative would be to just use "git repack -a" instead of "-ad". But then _every_ object would be duplicated as loose and packed, and we might miss a bug that omits packed objects (because we'd show their loose counterparts). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-pull.txt')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions