summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLibravatar Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>2020-10-08 22:23:54 +0200
committerLibravatar Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2020-10-08 14:01:15 -0700
commitdf49a806abab459430ce022d97ae62ab99e5bab4 (patch)
tree65c67ff8b5c1f624d728a2d8cee1b6a75571f845
parentGit 2.29-rc0 (diff)
downloadtgif-df49a806abab459430ce022d97ae62ab99e5bab4.tar.xz
git-bisect-lk2009: make continuation of list indented
That's clearer asciidoc formatting. Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-rw-r--r--Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt16
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt
index 3ba49e85b7..f3d9566c89 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ Z-Z
-------------
2) starting from the "good" ends of the graph, associate to each
-commit the number of ancestors it has plus one
+ commit the number of ancestors it has plus one
For example with the following graph where H is the "bad" commit and A
and D are some parents of some "good" commits:
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ D---E
-------------
4) the best bisection point is the commit with the highest associated
-number
+ number
So in the above example the best bisection point is commit C.
@@ -580,8 +580,8 @@ good or a bad commit does not give more or less information).
Let's also suppose that we have a cleaned up graph like one after step
1) in the bisection algorithm above. This means that we can measure
-the information we get in terms of number of commit we can remove from
-the graph..
+ the information we get in terms of number of commit we can remove
+ from the graph..
And let's take a commit X in the graph.
@@ -689,18 +689,18 @@ roughly the following steps:
6) sort the commit by decreasing associated value
7) if the first commit has not been skipped, we can return it and stop
-here
+ here
8) otherwise filter out all the skipped commits in the sorted list
9) use a pseudo random number generator (PRNG) to generate a random
-number between 0 and 1
+ number between 0 and 1
10) multiply this random number with its square root to bias it toward
-0
+ 0
11) multiply the result by the number of commits in the filtered list
-to get an index into this list
+ to get an index into this list
12) return the commit at the computed index