From c9b6220fef01dce80a31436660cd06b4e1db030f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tobi <31960611+tsmethurst@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:27:42 +0200 Subject: [chore] Add interaction filter to complement existing visibility filter (#3111) * [chore] Add interaction filter to complement existing visibility filter * pass in ptr to visibility and interaction filters to Processor{} to ensure shared * use int constants for for match type, cache db calls in filterctx * function name typo :innocent: --------- Co-authored-by: kim --- internal/processing/account/bookmarks.go | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'internal/processing/account/bookmarks.go') diff --git a/internal/processing/account/bookmarks.go b/internal/processing/account/bookmarks.go index b9ecf0217..d64108d3a 100644 --- a/internal/processing/account/bookmarks.go +++ b/internal/processing/account/bookmarks.go @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ func (p *Processor) BookmarksGet(ctx context.Context, requestingAccount *gtsmode return nil, gtserror.NewErrorInternalError(err) // A real error has occurred. } - visible, err := p.filter.StatusVisible(ctx, requestingAccount, status) + visible, err := p.visFilter.StatusVisible(ctx, requestingAccount, status) if err != nil { log.Errorf(ctx, "error checking bookmarked status visibility: %s", err) continue -- cgit v1.2.3