summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/internal/visibility/statusvisible.go
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'internal/visibility/statusvisible.go')
-rw-r--r--internal/visibility/statusvisible.go197
1 files changed, 197 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/internal/visibility/statusvisible.go b/internal/visibility/statusvisible.go
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..caf5cfcfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internal/visibility/statusvisible.go
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+package visibility
+
+import (
+ "errors"
+
+ "fmt"
+
+ "github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
+ "github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/db"
+ "github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/gtsmodel"
+)
+
+func (f *filter) StatusVisible(targetStatus *gtsmodel.Status, requestingAccount *gtsmodel.Account) (bool, error) {
+ l := f.log.WithFields(logrus.Fields{
+ "func": "StatusVisible",
+ "statusID": targetStatus.ID,
+ "requestingAccountID": requestingAccount.ID,
+ })
+
+ relevantAccounts, err := f.pullRelevantAccountsFromStatus(targetStatus)
+ if err != nil {
+ l.Debugf("error pulling relevant accounts for status %s: %s", targetStatus.ID, err)
+ }
+ targetAccount := relevantAccounts.StatusAuthor
+
+ // if target account is suspended then don't show the status
+ if !targetAccount.SuspendedAt.IsZero() {
+ l.Trace("target account suspended at is not zero")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+
+ // if the target user doesn't exist (anymore) then the status also shouldn't be visible
+ // note: we only do this for local users
+ if targetAccount.Domain == "" {
+ targetUser := &gtsmodel.User{}
+ if err := f.db.GetWhere([]db.Where{{Key: "account_id", Value: targetAccount.ID}}, targetUser); err != nil {
+ l.Debug("target user could not be selected")
+ if _, ok := err.(db.ErrNoEntries); ok {
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ return false, fmt.Errorf("StatusVisible: db error selecting user for local target account %s: %s", targetAccount.ID, err)
+ }
+
+ // if target user is disabled, not yet approved, or not confirmed then don't show the status
+ // (although in the latter two cases it's unlikely they posted a status yet anyway, but you never know!)
+ if targetUser.Disabled || !targetUser.Approved || targetUser.ConfirmedAt.IsZero() {
+ l.Trace("target user is disabled, not approved, or not confirmed")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ }
+
+ // if the requesting user doesn't exist (anymore) then the status also shouldn't be visible
+ // note: we only do this for local users
+ if requestingAccount.Domain == "" {
+ requestingUser := &gtsmodel.User{}
+ if err := f.db.GetWhere([]db.Where{{Key: "account_id", Value: requestingAccount.ID}}, requestingUser); err != nil {
+ // if the requesting account is local but doesn't have a corresponding user in the db this is a problem
+ l.Debug("requesting user could not be selected")
+ if _, ok := err.(db.ErrNoEntries); ok {
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ return false, fmt.Errorf("StatusVisible: db error selecting user for local requesting account %s: %s", requestingAccount.ID, err)
+ }
+ // okay, user exists, so make sure it has full privileges/is confirmed/approved
+ if requestingUser.Disabled || !requestingUser.Approved || requestingUser.ConfirmedAt.IsZero() {
+ l.Trace("requesting account is local but corresponding user is either disabled, not approved, or not confirmed")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ }
+
+ // If requesting account is nil, that means whoever requested the status didn't auth, or their auth failed.
+ // In this case, we can still serve the status if it's public, otherwise we definitely shouldn't.
+ if requestingAccount == nil {
+ if targetStatus.Visibility == gtsmodel.VisibilityPublic {
+ return true, nil
+ }
+ l.Trace("requesting account is nil but the target status isn't public")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+
+ // if requesting account is suspended then don't show the status -- although they probably shouldn't have gotten
+ // this far (ie., been authed) in the first place: this is just for safety.
+ if !requestingAccount.SuspendedAt.IsZero() {
+ l.Trace("requesting account is suspended")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+
+ // if the target status belongs to the requesting account, they should always be able to view it at this point
+ if targetStatus.AccountID == requestingAccount.ID {
+ return true, nil
+ }
+
+ // At this point we have a populated targetAccount, targetStatus, and requestingAccount, so we can check for blocks and whathaveyou
+ // First check if a block exists directly between the target account (which authored the status) and the requesting account.
+ if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(targetAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
+ l.Debugf("something went wrong figuring out if the accounts have a block: %s", err)
+ return false, err
+ } else if blocked {
+ // don't allow the status to be viewed if a block exists in *either* direction between these two accounts, no creepy stalking please
+ l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and target account")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+
+ // status replies to account id
+ if relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount != nil && relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount.ID != requestingAccount.ID {
+ if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
+ return false, err
+ } else if blocked {
+ l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and reply to account")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+
+ // check reply to ID
+ if targetStatus.InReplyToID != "" && (targetStatus.Visibility == gtsmodel.VisibilityFollowersOnly || targetStatus.Visibility == gtsmodel.VisibilityDirect) {
+ followsRepliedAccount, err := f.db.Follows(requestingAccount, relevantAccounts.ReplyToAccount)
+ if err != nil {
+ return false, err
+ }
+ if !followsRepliedAccount {
+ l.Trace("target status is a followers-only reply to an account that is not followed by the requesting account")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // status boosts accounts id
+ if relevantAccounts.BoostedAccount != nil {
+ if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(relevantAccounts.BoostedAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
+ return false, err
+ } else if blocked {
+ l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and boosted account")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ }
+
+ // status boosts a reply to account id
+ if relevantAccounts.BoostedReplyToAccount != nil {
+ if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(relevantAccounts.BoostedReplyToAccount.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
+ return false, err
+ } else if blocked {
+ l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and boosted reply to account")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ }
+
+ // status mentions accounts
+ for _, a := range relevantAccounts.MentionedAccounts {
+ if blocked, err := f.db.Blocked(a.ID, requestingAccount.ID); err != nil {
+ return false, err
+ } else if blocked {
+ l.Trace("a block exists between requesting account and a mentioned account")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ }
+
+ // if the requesting account is mentioned in the status it should always be visible
+ for _, acct := range relevantAccounts.MentionedAccounts {
+ if acct.ID == requestingAccount.ID {
+ return true, nil // yep it's mentioned!
+ }
+ }
+
+ // at this point we know neither account blocks the other, or another account mentioned or otherwise referred to in the status
+ // that means it's now just a matter of checking the visibility settings of the status itself
+ switch targetStatus.Visibility {
+ case gtsmodel.VisibilityPublic, gtsmodel.VisibilityUnlocked:
+ // no problem here, just return OK
+ return true, nil
+ case gtsmodel.VisibilityFollowersOnly:
+ // check one-way follow
+ follows, err := f.db.Follows(requestingAccount, targetAccount)
+ if err != nil {
+ return false, err
+ }
+ if !follows {
+ l.Trace("requested status is followers only but requesting account is not a follower")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ return true, nil
+ case gtsmodel.VisibilityMutualsOnly:
+ // check mutual follow
+ mutuals, err := f.db.Mutuals(requestingAccount, targetAccount)
+ if err != nil {
+ return false, err
+ }
+ if !mutuals {
+ l.Trace("requested status is mutuals only but accounts aren't mufos")
+ return false, nil
+ }
+ return true, nil
+ case gtsmodel.VisibilityDirect:
+ l.Trace("requesting account requests a status it's not mentioned in")
+ return false, nil // it's not mentioned -_-
+ }
+
+ return false, errors.New("reached the end of StatusVisible with no result")
+}