[chore/deps] Upgrade to go-sqlite 0.27.1 (#4334)

# Description

This brings some performance improvements and SQLite 3.50.3.

## Checklist

Please put an x inside each checkbox to indicate that you've read and followed it: `[ ]` -> `[x]`

If this is a documentation change, only the first checkbox must be filled (you can delete the others if you want).

- [x] I/we have read the [GoToSocial contribution guidelines](https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [ ] I/we have discussed the proposed changes already, either in an issue on the repository, or in the Matrix chat.
- [x] I/we have not leveraged AI to create the proposed changes.
- [ ] I/we have performed a self-review of added code.
- [ ] I/we have written code that is legible and maintainable by others.
- [ ] I/we have commented the added code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
- [ ] I/we have made any necessary changes to documentation.
- [ ] I/we have added tests that cover new code.
- [x] I/we have run tests and they pass locally with the changes.
- [ ] I/we have run `go fmt ./...` and `golangci-lint run`.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/pulls/4334
Co-authored-by: Daenney <git@noreply.sourcery.dny.nu>
Co-committed-by: Daenney <git@noreply.sourcery.dny.nu>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/vendor/golang.org/x/tools/internal/modindex/symbols.go b/vendor/golang.org/x/tools/internal/modindex/symbols.go
index b918529d4..31a502c58 100644
--- a/vendor/golang.org/x/tools/internal/modindex/symbols.go
+++ b/vendor/golang.org/x/tools/internal/modindex/symbols.go
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ import (
 type symbol struct {
 	pkg  string // name of the symbols's package
 	name string // declared name
-	kind string // T, C, V, or F, follwed by D if deprecated
+	kind string // T, C, V, or F, followed by D if deprecated
 	sig  string // signature information, for F
 }
 
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ func getFileExports(f *ast.File) []symbol {
 				// The only place a $ can occur seems to be in a struct tag, which
 				// can be an arbitrary string literal, and ExprString does not presently
 				// print struct tags. So for this to happen the type of a formal parameter
-				// has to be a explict struct, e.g. foo(x struct{a int "$"}) and ExprString
+				// has to be a explicit struct, e.g. foo(x struct{a int "$"}) and ExprString
 				// would have to show the struct tag. Even testing for this case seems
 				// a waste of effort, but let's remember the possibility
 				if strings.Contains(tp, "$") {