diff options
| author | 2025-06-10 14:29:42 +0200 | |
|---|---|---|
| committer | 2025-09-03 16:53:54 +0200 | |
| commit | 56f98dc3b98d7220947957551ec5aa2f82f9b997 (patch) | |
| tree | 91068d6fd6d524f3b23a05bff85a8857d2e75419 /internal/ap/extract.go | |
| parent | [docs] Various little docs updates (#4144) (diff) | |
| download | gotosocial-56f98dc3b98d7220947957551ec5aa2f82f9b997.tar.xz | |
[chore] Update interactionPolicy sub-policy parsing in line with documented defaults (#4229)
> If this is a code change, please include a summary of what you've coded, and link to the issue(s) it closes/implements.
>
> If this is a documentation change, please briefly describe what you've changed and why.
Brings our parsing of unset sub-policies in line with the defaults documented here: https://docs.gotosocial.org/en/v0.19.1/federation/interaction_policy/#defaults-per-sub-policy
Closes https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/issues/4146
Part of https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/issues/4026
Please put an x inside each checkbox to indicate that you've read and followed it: `[ ]` -> `[x]`
If this is a documentation change, only the first checkbox must be filled (you can delete the others if you want).
- [x] I/we have read the [GoToSocial contribution guidelines](https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I/we have discussed the proposed changes already, either in an issue on the repository, or in the Matrix chat.
- [x] I/we have not leveraged AI to create the proposed changes.
- [x] I/we have performed a self-review of added code.
- [x] I/we have written code that is legible and maintainable by others.
- [x] I/we have commented the added code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
- [ ] I/we have made any necessary changes to documentation.
- [x] I/we have added tests that cover new code.
- [x] I/we have run tests and they pass locally with the changes.
- [x] I/we have run `go fmt ./...` and `golangci-lint run`.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/pulls/4229
Co-authored-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
Co-committed-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'internal/ap/extract.go')
| -rw-r--r-- | internal/ap/extract.go | 44 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/internal/ap/extract.go b/internal/ap/extract.go index 2387c1f9a..776471538 100644 --- a/internal/ap/extract.go +++ b/internal/ap/extract.go @@ -1074,6 +1074,9 @@ func ExtractVisibility(addressable Addressable, actorFollowersURI string) (gtsmo // Will be nil (default policy) for Statusables that have no policy // set on them, or have a null policy. In such a case, the caller // should assume the default policy for the status's visibility level. +// +// Sub-policies of the returned policy, eg., CanLike, CanReply, may +// each be nil if they were not set on the interaction policy. func ExtractInteractionPolicy( statusable Statusable, owner *gtsmodel.Account, @@ -1100,6 +1103,8 @@ func ExtractInteractionPolicy( return nil } + // There's a policy key/value + // set, extract sub-policies. return >smodel.InteractionPolicy{ CanLike: extractCanLike(policy.GetGoToSocialCanLike(), owner), CanReply: extractCanReply(policy.GetGoToSocialCanReply(), owner), @@ -1107,73 +1112,82 @@ func ExtractInteractionPolicy( } } +// Returns either a parsed CanLike sub-policy, or nil +// if canLike is not set, ie., if this post is from an +// instance that doesn't know / care about canLike. func extractCanLike( prop vocab.GoToSocialCanLikeProperty, owner *gtsmodel.Account, -) gtsmodel.PolicyRules { +) *gtsmodel.PolicyRules { if prop == nil || prop.Len() != 1 { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } propIter := prop.At(0) if !propIter.IsGoToSocialCanLike() { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } withRules := propIter.Get() if withRules == nil { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{ + return >smodel.PolicyRules{ Always: extractPolicyValues(withRules.GetGoToSocialAlways(), owner), WithApproval: extractPolicyValues(withRules.GetGoToSocialApprovalRequired(), owner), } } +// Returns either a parsed CanReply sub-policy, or nil +// if canReply is not set, ie., if this post is from an +// instance that doesn't know / care about canReply. func extractCanReply( prop vocab.GoToSocialCanReplyProperty, owner *gtsmodel.Account, -) gtsmodel.PolicyRules { +) *gtsmodel.PolicyRules { if prop == nil || prop.Len() != 1 { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } propIter := prop.At(0) if !propIter.IsGoToSocialCanReply() { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } withRules := propIter.Get() if withRules == nil { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{ + return >smodel.PolicyRules{ Always: extractPolicyValues(withRules.GetGoToSocialAlways(), owner), WithApproval: extractPolicyValues(withRules.GetGoToSocialApprovalRequired(), owner), } } +// Returns either a parsed CanAnnounce sub-policy, or nil +// if canAnnounce is not set, ie., if this post is from an +// instance that doesn't know / care about canAnnounce. func extractCanAnnounce( prop vocab.GoToSocialCanAnnounceProperty, owner *gtsmodel.Account, -) gtsmodel.PolicyRules { +) *gtsmodel.PolicyRules { if prop == nil || prop.Len() != 1 { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } propIter := prop.At(0) if !propIter.IsGoToSocialCanAnnounce() { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } withRules := propIter.Get() if withRules == nil { - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{} + return nil } - return gtsmodel.PolicyRules{ + return >smodel.PolicyRules{ Always: extractPolicyValues(withRules.GetGoToSocialAlways(), owner), WithApproval: extractPolicyValues(withRules.GetGoToSocialApprovalRequired(), owner), } |
